在治疗结直肠癌肝转移方面,经动脉化疗栓塞术和微波消融术的组合优于单独使用微波消融术。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s00432-024-05951-8
Thomas J Vogl, Hannah Stefan, Tatjana Gruber-Rouh, Jörg Trojan, Wolf Otto Bechstein, John Bielfeldt, Hamzah Adwan
{"title":"在治疗结直肠癌肝转移方面,经动脉化疗栓塞术和微波消融术的组合优于单独使用微波消融术。","authors":"Thomas J Vogl, Hannah Stefan, Tatjana Gruber-Rouh, Jörg Trojan, Wolf Otto Bechstein, John Bielfeldt, Hamzah Adwan","doi":"10.1007/s00432-024-05951-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) with MWA alone in treating liver metastases from colorectal cancer (LMCRC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, a total of 251 patients with unresectable and not to chemotherapy responding LMCRC were included. Group A consisted of 184 patients (104 male and 80 females; mean age: 64 ± 11.4 years) with 442 metastases who received a combination of TACE and MWA. A total of 67 patients (49 male and 18 females; mean age: 63.2 ± 11.8 years) with 173 metastases patients were included in group B, who received only MWA. Parameters assessed were local tumor progression (LTP), hepatic distant tumor progression (hDTP), hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of LTP was 4.9% in group A and 4.5% in group B (p-value: 0.062). The rate of hDTP was 71.7% and 83.6% for groups A and B (p-value: 0.81), respectively. The mean hPFS was 13.8 months (95% CI 10.9-16.8) for group A and 8.1 months (95% CI 6.1-10.1) for group B (p-value: 0.03). The median OS time for group A was 30 months (95% CI 26-34), with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 84.2%, 61.1%, 40.8% and 31.3%, respectively. In group B however, the median OS time was 26 months (95% CI 18-34) with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 82.3%, 53.2%, 34.6% and 28.2%, respectively (p-value: 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination therapy of TACE and MWA is superior to the monotherapy of MWA for LMCRC, especially regarding hDTP, hPFS and OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"150 10","pages":"440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The combination of transarterial chemoembolization and microwave ablation is superior to microwave ablation alone for liver metastases from colorectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J Vogl, Hannah Stefan, Tatjana Gruber-Rouh, Jörg Trojan, Wolf Otto Bechstein, John Bielfeldt, Hamzah Adwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00432-024-05951-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) with MWA alone in treating liver metastases from colorectal cancer (LMCRC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, a total of 251 patients with unresectable and not to chemotherapy responding LMCRC were included. Group A consisted of 184 patients (104 male and 80 females; mean age: 64 ± 11.4 years) with 442 metastases who received a combination of TACE and MWA. A total of 67 patients (49 male and 18 females; mean age: 63.2 ± 11.8 years) with 173 metastases patients were included in group B, who received only MWA. Parameters assessed were local tumor progression (LTP), hepatic distant tumor progression (hDTP), hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of LTP was 4.9% in group A and 4.5% in group B (p-value: 0.062). The rate of hDTP was 71.7% and 83.6% for groups A and B (p-value: 0.81), respectively. The mean hPFS was 13.8 months (95% CI 10.9-16.8) for group A and 8.1 months (95% CI 6.1-10.1) for group B (p-value: 0.03). The median OS time for group A was 30 months (95% CI 26-34), with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 84.2%, 61.1%, 40.8% and 31.3%, respectively. In group B however, the median OS time was 26 months (95% CI 18-34) with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 82.3%, 53.2%, 34.6% and 28.2%, respectively (p-value: 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination therapy of TACE and MWA is superior to the monotherapy of MWA for LMCRC, especially regarding hDTP, hPFS and OS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"150 10\",\"pages\":\"440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445293/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-05951-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-05951-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在比较经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)和微波消融术(MWA)联合疗法与单用微波消融术治疗结直肠癌肝转移(LMCRC)的效果:在这项回顾性研究中,共纳入了251例无法切除且化疗无效的结直肠癌肝转移患者。A 组包括 184 名患者(男性 104 名,女性 80 名;平均年龄:64 ± 11.4 岁),共有 442 个转移灶,他们接受了 TACE 和 MWA 联合治疗。B 组共包括 67 名患者(49 名男性和 18 名女性;平均年龄为 63.2 ± 11.8 岁)和 173 名转移灶患者,他们只接受了 MWA 治疗。评估指标包括局部肿瘤进展(LTP)、肝远处肿瘤进展(hDTP)、肝无进展生存期(hPFS)和总生存期(OS):A组的LTP率为4.9%,B组为4.5%(P值:0.062)。A组和B组的hDTP率分别为71.7%和83.6%(P值:0.81)。A 组的平均 hPFS 为 13.8 个月(95% CI 10.9-16.8),B 组为 8.1 个月(95% CI 6.1-10.1)(P 值:0.03)。A 组的中位 OS 时间为 30 个月(95% CI 26-34),1、2、3 和 4 年 OS 率分别为 84.2%、61.1%、40.8% 和 31.3%。而在B组,中位OS时间为26个月(95% CI 18-34),1、2、3和4年OS率分别为82.3%、53.2%、34.6%和28.2%(P值:0.67):结论:TACE和MWA联合治疗LMCRC优于MWA单药治疗,尤其是在hDTP、hPFS和OS方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The combination of transarterial chemoembolization and microwave ablation is superior to microwave ablation alone for liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) with MWA alone in treating liver metastases from colorectal cancer (LMCRC).

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 251 patients with unresectable and not to chemotherapy responding LMCRC were included. Group A consisted of 184 patients (104 male and 80 females; mean age: 64 ± 11.4 years) with 442 metastases who received a combination of TACE and MWA. A total of 67 patients (49 male and 18 females; mean age: 63.2 ± 11.8 years) with 173 metastases patients were included in group B, who received only MWA. Parameters assessed were local tumor progression (LTP), hepatic distant tumor progression (hDTP), hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: The rate of LTP was 4.9% in group A and 4.5% in group B (p-value: 0.062). The rate of hDTP was 71.7% and 83.6% for groups A and B (p-value: 0.81), respectively. The mean hPFS was 13.8 months (95% CI 10.9-16.8) for group A and 8.1 months (95% CI 6.1-10.1) for group B (p-value: 0.03). The median OS time for group A was 30 months (95% CI 26-34), with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 84.2%, 61.1%, 40.8% and 31.3%, respectively. In group B however, the median OS time was 26 months (95% CI 18-34) with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 82.3%, 53.2%, 34.6% and 28.2%, respectively (p-value: 0.67).

Conclusion: The combination therapy of TACE and MWA is superior to the monotherapy of MWA for LMCRC, especially regarding hDTP, hPFS and OS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Dosimetric evaluation of different cylinder diameters in three-dimensional vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer. The role of the SOX2 gene in cervical cancer: focus on ferroptosis and construction of a predictive model. Osteopontin: an indispensable component in common liver, pancreatic, and biliary related disease. Efficacy of sintilimab combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab in conversional treatment of locally advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer: case analysis and literature review. Identification of a novel molecular classification for hepatocellular carcinoma based on disulfideptosis-related genes and its potential prognostic significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1