利用未合并的 BDS-3 多频数据,卫星在不同 IGS 时钟产品之间的差分编码偏差转换模型

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Geodesy Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1007/s00190-024-01899-2
Jingzhu Zhao, Lei Fan, Shiwei Guo, Chuang Shi
{"title":"利用未合并的 BDS-3 多频数据,卫星在不同 IGS 时钟产品之间的差分编码偏差转换模型","authors":"Jingzhu Zhao, Lei Fan, Shiwei Guo, Chuang Shi","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01899-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Differential code bias (DCB) is widely used to achieve consistency between global navigation satellite system (GNSS) observations at different frequencies. Since a strong correlation exists between satellite DCBs at different frequencies and the satellite clock offset, the DCB products need to be aligned with the corresponding clock products. This paper proposes a satellite’s DCB conversion model between different clock products released by the International GNSS Service (IGS) via the uncombined method. First, a one-step uncombined approach with a simplified ionospheric processing model is proposed for multi-frequency DCB estimation. In the second step, a linear function model is applied to represent the relationship between the initial satellite clock bias and the DCB estimates at different frequencies. To test the proposed model, BeiDou global system (BDS-3) multi-frequency data collected from 60 multi-GNSS experiment stations and precise clock products released by four IGS analysis centers are used to estimate the DCB. The DCB estimates are compared to the DCB products released by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt (DLR). The average root-mean-square (RMS) values of the differences between the DCB estimates and the two DCB products are 0.61 ns and 0.52 ns, which are significantly larger than the corresponding monthly standard deviations. This indicates that systematic bias exists between the DCB estimates and the two DCB products. Additionally, systematic biases are also observed in the DCB estimation when different clock products are used, with the maximum value reaching 4 ns. In order to study the propagation of parameter errors between the DCB estimates and the clock products, regression analysis is conducted to determine the linear model coefficients of the DCB conversion model. The results show that the model coefficients for the four frequency pairs C2I-C6I, C2I-C1X, C2I-C5X and C2I-C7Z are 0.394, 0.237, 0.238, and 0.238, respectively. Kinematic precision point positioning is conducted for model verification. During the first 6-h period, the average three-dimensional RMS of the positioning errors is 13.5 cm when the DCB estimates are corrected by the conversion model, which is improved by 32.5%, 14.6%, and 11.3% compared with the usage of the CAS and DLR products and those without model conversion, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Satellite’s differential code bias conversion model between different IGS clock products using uncombined BDS-3 multi-frequency data\",\"authors\":\"Jingzhu Zhao, Lei Fan, Shiwei Guo, Chuang Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00190-024-01899-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Differential code bias (DCB) is widely used to achieve consistency between global navigation satellite system (GNSS) observations at different frequencies. Since a strong correlation exists between satellite DCBs at different frequencies and the satellite clock offset, the DCB products need to be aligned with the corresponding clock products. This paper proposes a satellite’s DCB conversion model between different clock products released by the International GNSS Service (IGS) via the uncombined method. First, a one-step uncombined approach with a simplified ionospheric processing model is proposed for multi-frequency DCB estimation. In the second step, a linear function model is applied to represent the relationship between the initial satellite clock bias and the DCB estimates at different frequencies. To test the proposed model, BeiDou global system (BDS-3) multi-frequency data collected from 60 multi-GNSS experiment stations and precise clock products released by four IGS analysis centers are used to estimate the DCB. The DCB estimates are compared to the DCB products released by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt (DLR). The average root-mean-square (RMS) values of the differences between the DCB estimates and the two DCB products are 0.61 ns and 0.52 ns, which are significantly larger than the corresponding monthly standard deviations. This indicates that systematic bias exists between the DCB estimates and the two DCB products. Additionally, systematic biases are also observed in the DCB estimation when different clock products are used, with the maximum value reaching 4 ns. In order to study the propagation of parameter errors between the DCB estimates and the clock products, regression analysis is conducted to determine the linear model coefficients of the DCB conversion model. The results show that the model coefficients for the four frequency pairs C2I-C6I, C2I-C1X, C2I-C5X and C2I-C7Z are 0.394, 0.237, 0.238, and 0.238, respectively. Kinematic precision point positioning is conducted for model verification. During the first 6-h period, the average three-dimensional RMS of the positioning errors is 13.5 cm when the DCB estimates are corrected by the conversion model, which is improved by 32.5%, 14.6%, and 11.3% compared with the usage of the CAS and DLR products and those without model conversion, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01899-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01899-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

差分码偏置(DCB)被广泛用于实现不同频率的全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)观测数据之间的一致性。由于不同频率的卫星 DCB 与卫星时钟偏移之间存在很强的相关性,因此 DCB 产品需要与相应的时钟产品保持一致。本文通过非组合方法提出了国际全球导航卫星系统服务组织(IGS)发布的不同时钟产品之间的卫星 DCB 转换模型。首先,针对多频率 DCB 估计,提出了一种具有简化电离层处理模型的一步非组合方法。第二步,采用线性函数模型来表示初始卫星时钟偏差与不同频率 DCB 估计值之间的关系。为了测试所提出的模型,使用了从 60 个多重全球导航卫星系统实验站收集的北斗全球系统(BDS-3)多频数据和四个 IGS 分析中心发布的精确时钟产品来估算 DCB。DCB 估计值与中国科学院(CAS)和德国航天中心(DLR)发布的 DCB 产品进行了比较。DCB估算值与两个DCB产品的平均均方根差值分别为0.61 ns和0.52 ns,明显大于相应的月标准偏差。这表明 DCB 估计值与两个 DCB 产品之间存在系统偏差。此外,当使用不同的时钟产品时,DCB 估计值也会出现系统偏差,最大值可达 4 ns。为了研究 DCB 估计值和时钟产品之间参数误差的传播,进行了回归分析,以确定 DCB 转换模型的线性模型系数。结果显示,四个频率对 C2I-C6I、C2I-C1X、C2I-C5X 和 C2I-C7Z 的模型系数分别为 0.394、0.237、0.238 和 0.238。为验证模型,进行了运动学精密点定位。在第一个 6 h 期间,当使用转换模型修正 DCB 估计值时,定位误差的平均三维均方根值为 13.5 cm,与使用 CAS 和 DLR 产品以及不使用模型转换相比,分别提高了 32.5%、14.6% 和 11.3%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Satellite’s differential code bias conversion model between different IGS clock products using uncombined BDS-3 multi-frequency data

Differential code bias (DCB) is widely used to achieve consistency between global navigation satellite system (GNSS) observations at different frequencies. Since a strong correlation exists between satellite DCBs at different frequencies and the satellite clock offset, the DCB products need to be aligned with the corresponding clock products. This paper proposes a satellite’s DCB conversion model between different clock products released by the International GNSS Service (IGS) via the uncombined method. First, a one-step uncombined approach with a simplified ionospheric processing model is proposed for multi-frequency DCB estimation. In the second step, a linear function model is applied to represent the relationship between the initial satellite clock bias and the DCB estimates at different frequencies. To test the proposed model, BeiDou global system (BDS-3) multi-frequency data collected from 60 multi-GNSS experiment stations and precise clock products released by four IGS analysis centers are used to estimate the DCB. The DCB estimates are compared to the DCB products released by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt (DLR). The average root-mean-square (RMS) values of the differences between the DCB estimates and the two DCB products are 0.61 ns and 0.52 ns, which are significantly larger than the corresponding monthly standard deviations. This indicates that systematic bias exists between the DCB estimates and the two DCB products. Additionally, systematic biases are also observed in the DCB estimation when different clock products are used, with the maximum value reaching 4 ns. In order to study the propagation of parameter errors between the DCB estimates and the clock products, regression analysis is conducted to determine the linear model coefficients of the DCB conversion model. The results show that the model coefficients for the four frequency pairs C2I-C6I, C2I-C1X, C2I-C5X and C2I-C7Z are 0.394, 0.237, 0.238, and 0.238, respectively. Kinematic precision point positioning is conducted for model verification. During the first 6-h period, the average three-dimensional RMS of the positioning errors is 13.5 cm when the DCB estimates are corrected by the conversion model, which is improved by 32.5%, 14.6%, and 11.3% compared with the usage of the CAS and DLR products and those without model conversion, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
期刊最新文献
Modified Bayesian method for simultaneously imaging fault geometry and slip distribution with reduced uncertainty, applied to 2017 Mw 7.3 Sarpol-e Zahab (Iran) earthquake Global 3D ionospheric shape function modeling with kriging Spherical radial basis functions model: approximating an integral functional of an isotropic Gaussian random field Capture of coseismic velocity waveform using GNSS raw Doppler and carrier phase data for enhancing shaking intensity estimation Derivation of the Sagnac (Earth-rotation) correction and analysis of its accuracy for GNSS applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1