Surpass Evolve 分流器治疗颅内动脉瘤的性能评估:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1177/15910199241284412
Aaron Rodriguez-Calienes, Juan Vivanco-Suarez, Nicole M Castillo-Huerta, David Espinoza-Martinez, Cristian Morán-Mariños, Ximena Espiritu-Vilcapoma, Valeria Rivera-Angles, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez
{"title":"Surpass Evolve 分流器治疗颅内动脉瘤的性能评估:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Aaron Rodriguez-Calienes, Juan Vivanco-Suarez, Nicole M Castillo-Huerta, David Espinoza-Martinez, Cristian Morán-Mariños, Ximena Espiritu-Vilcapoma, Valeria Rivera-Angles, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez","doi":"10.1177/15910199241284412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Surpass Evolve (SE) has emerged as a promising alternative treatment from the flow diverter series. The utilization of the SE has gradually increased, however, there is a scarcity of comprehensive data on the solidity of this technology in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the SE flow diverter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search from inception to April 2024 was conducted across five databases for studies involving IAs treated with the SE. The primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of complete aneurysm occlusion at the final follow-up, and the primary safety outcome comprised a composite of early and delayed complications. Subgroup analyses based on aneurysm size, anatomical location, and rupture status were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis included nine studies with 645 patients and 722 IAs. Effectiveness outcomes revealed an overall complete aneurysm occlusion rate of 69% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 58%-78%; <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 72%) and a favorable aneurysm occlusion rate of 91% (95% CI = 82%-96%; <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 49%). Safety outcomes demonstrated an overall complications rate of 6% (95% CI = 3%-12%; <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 66%), with an early complications rate of 6% (95% CI = 4%-11%; <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0%), and a delayed complications rate of 0% (95% CI = 0%-7%; <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest a favorable outcome with a high rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at the last follow-up, with acceptable rates of neurological complications. Future research efforts should focus on larger, prospective studies with standardized outcome measures to further elucidate the clinical utility of the SE flow diverter in the management of IAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance assessment of the Surpass Evolve flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Rodriguez-Calienes, Juan Vivanco-Suarez, Nicole M Castillo-Huerta, David Espinoza-Martinez, Cristian Morán-Mariños, Ximena Espiritu-Vilcapoma, Valeria Rivera-Angles, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199241284412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Surpass Evolve (SE) has emerged as a promising alternative treatment from the flow diverter series. The utilization of the SE has gradually increased, however, there is a scarcity of comprehensive data on the solidity of this technology in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the SE flow diverter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search from inception to April 2024 was conducted across five databases for studies involving IAs treated with the SE. The primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of complete aneurysm occlusion at the final follow-up, and the primary safety outcome comprised a composite of early and delayed complications. Subgroup analyses based on aneurysm size, anatomical location, and rupture status were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis included nine studies with 645 patients and 722 IAs. Effectiveness outcomes revealed an overall complete aneurysm occlusion rate of 69% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 58%-78%; <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 72%) and a favorable aneurysm occlusion rate of 91% (95% CI = 82%-96%; <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 49%). Safety outcomes demonstrated an overall complications rate of 6% (95% CI = 3%-12%; <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 66%), with an early complications rate of 6% (95% CI = 4%-11%; <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0%), and a delayed complications rate of 0% (95% CI = 0%-7%; <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest a favorable outcome with a high rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at the last follow-up, with acceptable rates of neurological complications. Future research efforts should focus on larger, prospective studies with standardized outcome measures to further elucidate the clinical utility of the SE flow diverter in the management of IAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241284412\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241284412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Surpass Evolve(SE)已从血流分流器系列中脱颖而出,成为一种前景广阔的替代治疗方法。SE的使用率已逐渐提高,然而,关于该技术在颅内动脉瘤(IAs)血管内治疗中的稳固性,却缺乏全面的数据。这项荟萃分析旨在评估SE血流分流器的安全性和有效性:方法:在五个数据库中进行了从开始到2024年4月的系统性文献检索,以了解使用SE治疗颅内动脉瘤的研究情况。主要有效性结果是最终随访时动脉瘤完全闭塞的比例,主要安全性结果包括早期和延迟并发症的复合结果。我们还根据动脉瘤大小、解剖位置和破裂状况进行了分组分析:我们的分析包括九项研究,共涉及 645 名患者和 722 个动脉瘤。疗效结果显示,动脉瘤完全闭塞率为 69%(95% 置信区间 (CI) = 58%-78%;I2 = 72%),动脉瘤良好闭塞率为 91%(95% CI = 82%-96%;I2 = 49%)。安全结果显示,总体并发症发生率为 6% (95% CI = 3%-12%; I2 = 66%),早期并发症发生率为 6% (95% CI = 4%-11%; I2 = 0%),延迟并发症发生率为 0% (95% CI = 0%-7%; I2 = 0%):我们的研究结果表明,最后一次随访时动脉瘤完全闭塞率较高,神经系统并发症发生率尚可接受,结果良好。未来的研究工作应侧重于规模更大、采用标准化结果测量方法的前瞻性研究,以进一步阐明SE血流分流器在动脉瘤治疗中的临床效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance assessment of the Surpass Evolve flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The Surpass Evolve (SE) has emerged as a promising alternative treatment from the flow diverter series. The utilization of the SE has gradually increased, however, there is a scarcity of comprehensive data on the solidity of this technology in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the SE flow diverter.

Methods: A systematic literature search from inception to April 2024 was conducted across five databases for studies involving IAs treated with the SE. The primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of complete aneurysm occlusion at the final follow-up, and the primary safety outcome comprised a composite of early and delayed complications. Subgroup analyses based on aneurysm size, anatomical location, and rupture status were also conducted.

Results: Our analysis included nine studies with 645 patients and 722 IAs. Effectiveness outcomes revealed an overall complete aneurysm occlusion rate of 69% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 58%-78%; I2 = 72%) and a favorable aneurysm occlusion rate of 91% (95% CI = 82%-96%; I2 = 49%). Safety outcomes demonstrated an overall complications rate of 6% (95% CI = 3%-12%; I2 = 66%), with an early complications rate of 6% (95% CI = 4%-11%; I2 = 0%), and a delayed complications rate of 0% (95% CI = 0%-7%; I2 = 0%).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest a favorable outcome with a high rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at the last follow-up, with acceptable rates of neurological complications. Future research efforts should focus on larger, prospective studies with standardized outcome measures to further elucidate the clinical utility of the SE flow diverter in the management of IAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
期刊最新文献
Emergent endovascular treatment versus medical treatment for acute large vessel occlusions with nondisabling symptoms. Performance assessment of the Surpass Evolve flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Safety and efficacy of coated flow diverters in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms during single antiplatelet therapy: A multicenter study. Silk vista baby flow diversion beyond the circle of Willis: A single-center experience with long-term outcomes. Barriers to stroke treatment: The price of long-distance from thrombectomy centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1