一项横断面分析发现,肯尼亚基利菲县有症状和无症状人群中卵形疟原虫感染率较低。

Q1 Medicine Wellcome Open Research Pub Date : 2024-09-17 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17972.4
Mercy Yvonne Akinyi, Margaret Chifwete, Leonard Ndwiga, Kelvin Muteru Kimenyi, Victor Osoti, Lynette Isabella Ochola-Oyier
{"title":"一项横断面分析发现,肯尼亚基利菲县有症状和无症状人群中卵形疟原虫感染率较低。","authors":"Mercy Yvonne Akinyi, Margaret Chifwete, Leonard Ndwiga, Kelvin Muteru Kimenyi, Victor Osoti, Lynette Isabella Ochola-Oyier","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17972.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The focus on <i>P. falciparum</i> diagnosis has led to an underestimation of the global burden of malaria resulting from neglected <i>Plasmodium</i> species. However, there is still scarce data on the prevalence of <i>P. ovale</i> species (spp) globally. To address this knowledge gap, data collected from cross-sectional studies in Kilifi county were used to: 1) determine the prevalence of <i>P. ovale spp</i> infections; and 2) determine the sensitivity of different diagnostic assays in detecting <i>P. ovale spp</i> infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 531 individuals were sampled across three study sites in Kilifi County, Kenya between 2009 and 2020. Blood smears were prepared from peripheral blood and screened for <i>Plasmodium</i> parasite stages using light microscopy. Molecular screening involved DNA extraction of dried blood spots and blood in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers targeting the 18 small ribosomal subunit and sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Microscopy screening revealed that the most prevalent species was <i>P. falciparum</i> (32.0%) followed by <i>P. malariae</i> (9.0%) and then <i>P. ovale spp(</i> 1.5%). PCR screening identified additional <i>P. ovale spp</i> positives cases. Overall PCR results indicate that43 (8.1%) out of the 531 individuals harbored <i>P. ovale spp</i> infection with the highest prevalence reported in the tertiary health facility, (14.6%, 95% CI 8-23.6%), followed by the primary health facility (8.3%, 95% CI 5.4-11.9%), and the community from a cross-sectional blood survey, (3.6%, 95% CI 1.2-8.2%). Microscopy screening for <i>P. ovale spp</i> had a low sensitivity of 7% (95% CI 1-19-30%) and a high specificity of 99% (95% CI 98-100%). Sequencing results confirmed the presence of <i>P.ovale curtisi</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides baseline data for <i>P.ovale spp</i> surveillance in Kilifi County, primarily using PCR to improve diagnosis. These results suggest that malaria elimination and eradication efforts should not only concentrate on <i>P. falciparum</i> but should embrace a holistic approach towards elimination of all <i>Plasmodium</i> spp.</p>","PeriodicalId":23677,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":"7 ","pages":"207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cross-sectional analysis identifies a low prevalence of <i>Plasmodium ovale</i> species <i> </i>infections in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in Kilifi county, Kenya.\",\"authors\":\"Mercy Yvonne Akinyi, Margaret Chifwete, Leonard Ndwiga, Kelvin Muteru Kimenyi, Victor Osoti, Lynette Isabella Ochola-Oyier\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17972.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The focus on <i>P. falciparum</i> diagnosis has led to an underestimation of the global burden of malaria resulting from neglected <i>Plasmodium</i> species. However, there is still scarce data on the prevalence of <i>P. ovale</i> species (spp) globally. To address this knowledge gap, data collected from cross-sectional studies in Kilifi county were used to: 1) determine the prevalence of <i>P. ovale spp</i> infections; and 2) determine the sensitivity of different diagnostic assays in detecting <i>P. ovale spp</i> infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 531 individuals were sampled across three study sites in Kilifi County, Kenya between 2009 and 2020. Blood smears were prepared from peripheral blood and screened for <i>Plasmodium</i> parasite stages using light microscopy. Molecular screening involved DNA extraction of dried blood spots and blood in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers targeting the 18 small ribosomal subunit and sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Microscopy screening revealed that the most prevalent species was <i>P. falciparum</i> (32.0%) followed by <i>P. malariae</i> (9.0%) and then <i>P. ovale spp(</i> 1.5%). PCR screening identified additional <i>P. ovale spp</i> positives cases. Overall PCR results indicate that43 (8.1%) out of the 531 individuals harbored <i>P. ovale spp</i> infection with the highest prevalence reported in the tertiary health facility, (14.6%, 95% CI 8-23.6%), followed by the primary health facility (8.3%, 95% CI 5.4-11.9%), and the community from a cross-sectional blood survey, (3.6%, 95% CI 1.2-8.2%). Microscopy screening for <i>P. ovale spp</i> had a low sensitivity of 7% (95% CI 1-19-30%) and a high specificity of 99% (95% CI 98-100%). Sequencing results confirmed the presence of <i>P.ovale curtisi</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides baseline data for <i>P.ovale spp</i> surveillance in Kilifi County, primarily using PCR to improve diagnosis. These results suggest that malaria elimination and eradication efforts should not only concentrate on <i>P. falciparum</i> but should embrace a holistic approach towards elimination of all <i>Plasmodium</i> spp.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wellcome Open Research\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447441/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wellcome Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17972.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17972.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对恶性疟原虫诊断的关注导致低估了被忽视的疟原虫种类造成的全球疟疾负担。然而,有关全球卵形疟原虫流行情况的数据仍然很少。为了填补这一知识空白,我们利用在基利菲县进行的横断面研究收集的数据,以便:1)确定卵形疟原虫的流行率:方法:方法:2009 年至 2020 年期间,在肯尼亚基利菲县的三个研究地点共采集了 531 人的样本。从外周血中制备血涂片,用光学显微镜筛查疟原虫阶段。分子筛查包括提取干血斑和乙二胺四乙酸血液中的 DNA,使用针对 18 小核糖体亚基的引物进行聚合酶链反应(PCR)和测序:显微镜筛查显示,最常见的是恶性疟原虫(32.0%),其次是疟疾疟原虫(9.0%),然后是卵形疟原虫(1.5%)。PCR 筛查发现了更多的卵形疟原虫阳性病例。总体 PCR 结果显示,531 人中有 43 人(8.1%)感染了卵形孢子虫,其中三级医疗机构的感染率最高(14.6%,95% CI 8-23.6%),其次是一级医疗机构(8.3%,95% CI 5.4-11.9%),社区横断面血液调查的感染率为(3.6%,95% CI 1.2-8.2%)。显微镜筛查卵圆形蝇属的敏感性较低,为 7%(95% CI 1-19-30%),特异性较高,为 99%(95% CI 98-100%)。测序结果证实了 P.ovale curtisi 的存在:这项研究为基利菲县的卵形孢子虫属监测提供了基线数据,主要是利用 PCR 提高诊断率。这些结果表明,消除和根除疟疾的工作不应只集中在恶性疟原虫上,而应采取综合方法消除所有疟原虫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A cross-sectional analysis identifies a low prevalence of Plasmodium ovale species  infections in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in Kilifi county, Kenya.

Background: The focus on P. falciparum diagnosis has led to an underestimation of the global burden of malaria resulting from neglected Plasmodium species. However, there is still scarce data on the prevalence of P. ovale species (spp) globally. To address this knowledge gap, data collected from cross-sectional studies in Kilifi county were used to: 1) determine the prevalence of P. ovale spp infections; and 2) determine the sensitivity of different diagnostic assays in detecting P. ovale spp infections.

Methods: A total of 531 individuals were sampled across three study sites in Kilifi County, Kenya between 2009 and 2020. Blood smears were prepared from peripheral blood and screened for Plasmodium parasite stages using light microscopy. Molecular screening involved DNA extraction of dried blood spots and blood in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers targeting the 18 small ribosomal subunit and sequencing.

Results: Microscopy screening revealed that the most prevalent species was P. falciparum (32.0%) followed by P. malariae (9.0%) and then P. ovale spp( 1.5%). PCR screening identified additional P. ovale spp positives cases. Overall PCR results indicate that43 (8.1%) out of the 531 individuals harbored P. ovale spp infection with the highest prevalence reported in the tertiary health facility, (14.6%, 95% CI 8-23.6%), followed by the primary health facility (8.3%, 95% CI 5.4-11.9%), and the community from a cross-sectional blood survey, (3.6%, 95% CI 1.2-8.2%). Microscopy screening for P. ovale spp had a low sensitivity of 7% (95% CI 1-19-30%) and a high specificity of 99% (95% CI 98-100%). Sequencing results confirmed the presence of P.ovale curtisi.

Conclusions: This study provides baseline data for P.ovale spp surveillance in Kilifi County, primarily using PCR to improve diagnosis. These results suggest that malaria elimination and eradication efforts should not only concentrate on P. falciparum but should embrace a holistic approach towards elimination of all Plasmodium spp.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wellcome Open Research
Wellcome Open Research Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: Wellcome Open Research publishes scholarly articles reporting any basic scientific, translational and clinical research that has been funded (or co-funded) by Wellcome. Each publication must have at least one author who has been, or still is, a recipient of a Wellcome grant. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others, is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies are all suitable. See the full list of article types here. All articles are published using a fully transparent, author-driven model: the authors are solely responsible for the content of their article. Invited peer review takes place openly after publication, and the authors play a crucial role in ensuring that the article is peer-reviewed by independent experts in a timely manner. Articles that pass peer review will be indexed in PubMed and elsewhere. Wellcome Open Research is an Open Research platform: all articles are published open access; the publishing and peer-review processes are fully transparent; and authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and to provide full and easy access to source data underlying the results to improve reproducibility.
期刊最新文献
testCompareR: an R package to compare two binary diagnostic tests using paired data. Association between type 2 diabetes and periodontitis: a population-based study in the North Peru. The genome sequence of barren brome, Bromus sterilis L. (Poaceae). Organophosphate and carbamate susceptibility profiling of Anopheles gambiae sl. across different ecosystems in southern Benin. "Transgenders are not dinosaurs!" Stigma faced by transgender women in their daily lives in India: implications for research and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1