2018 年台湾花莲 M6.3 地震断层破坏诱发的极近场地震断层压降和延迟震后跨断层流

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1029/2024JB029188
Ruei-Jiun Hung, Matthew Weingarten, Michael Manga
{"title":"2018 年台湾花莲 M6.3 地震断层破坏诱发的极近场地震断层压降和延迟震后跨断层流","authors":"Ruei-Jiun Hung,&nbsp;Matthew Weingarten,&nbsp;Michael Manga","doi":"10.1029/2024JB029188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Earthquakes can produce rock damage, poroelastic deformation, and ground shaking that modify fault zone hydrogeologic properties. Coseismic and postseismic hydrologic response to the ruptured fault can serve as constraints on hydrogeologic property changes. Here, we document fluid pressure responses to the 2018 <b>M</b>6.3 Hualien, Taiwan earthquake and model the postseismic fault zone hydrology inferred from very-near-fault data. Two groundwater wells located ∼180–250 m from the fault damage zone experienced 10–15 m of groundwater level decline followed by a prolonged (&gt;6 months) recovery. Poroelastic models indicate that strain dilation in the fault's hanging wall can produce water level reductions of several meters. However, the model cannot explain groundwater level change in the footwall nor the delayed postseismic recovery, suggesting fault zone damage played a primary role in both the coseismic and postseismic water level reductions. Fluid flow models incorporating the effects of coseismic fault damage on the temporal evolution of hydrologic fault properties show enhanced hydraulic anisotropy after the earthquake. The best-fit models show that while both vertical hydraulic conductivity and specific storage likely increased within the fault zone, the horizontal hydraulic conductivity is low, suggesting the fault zone behaves as a hydraulic barrier to cross-fault flow with modeled diffusivities as low as ∼10<sup>−3</sup> m<sup>2</sup>/s. High-fidelity hydrologic measurements in the very-near-field of fault zones (e.g., within a few hundred meters) may be a useful tool to constrain the spatial and temporal evolution of fault zone properties before, during, and after rupture.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"129 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Very-Near-Field Coseismic Fault Pressure Drop and Delayed Postseismic Cross-Fault Flow Induced by Fault Damage From the 2018 M6.3 Hualien, Taiwan Earthquake\",\"authors\":\"Ruei-Jiun Hung,&nbsp;Matthew Weingarten,&nbsp;Michael Manga\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JB029188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Earthquakes can produce rock damage, poroelastic deformation, and ground shaking that modify fault zone hydrogeologic properties. Coseismic and postseismic hydrologic response to the ruptured fault can serve as constraints on hydrogeologic property changes. Here, we document fluid pressure responses to the 2018 <b>M</b>6.3 Hualien, Taiwan earthquake and model the postseismic fault zone hydrology inferred from very-near-fault data. Two groundwater wells located ∼180–250 m from the fault damage zone experienced 10–15 m of groundwater level decline followed by a prolonged (&gt;6 months) recovery. Poroelastic models indicate that strain dilation in the fault's hanging wall can produce water level reductions of several meters. However, the model cannot explain groundwater level change in the footwall nor the delayed postseismic recovery, suggesting fault zone damage played a primary role in both the coseismic and postseismic water level reductions. Fluid flow models incorporating the effects of coseismic fault damage on the temporal evolution of hydrologic fault properties show enhanced hydraulic anisotropy after the earthquake. The best-fit models show that while both vertical hydraulic conductivity and specific storage likely increased within the fault zone, the horizontal hydraulic conductivity is low, suggesting the fault zone behaves as a hydraulic barrier to cross-fault flow with modeled diffusivities as low as ∼10<sup>−3</sup> m<sup>2</sup>/s. High-fidelity hydrologic measurements in the very-near-field of fault zones (e.g., within a few hundred meters) may be a useful tool to constrain the spatial and temporal evolution of fault zone properties before, during, and after rupture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"volume\":\"129 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB029188\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB029188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地震会造成岩石破坏、孔弹性变形和地面震动,从而改变断层带的水文地质属性。破裂断层的震中和震后水文响应可作为水文地质属性变化的制约因素。在此,我们记录了 2018 年台湾花莲 M6.3 地震的流体压力响应,并根据非常接近断层的数据建立了震后断层带水文模型。距离断层破坏带 180-250 米的两口地下水井经历了 10-15 米的地下水位下降,随后经历了长时间(6 个月)的恢复。沸弹性模型表明,断层悬壁的应变扩张可导致水位下降数米。然而,该模型无法解释脚墙的地下水位变化,也无法解释震后恢复的延迟,这表明断层带的破坏在同震和震后水位下降中起了主要作用。包含同震断层破坏对水文断层特性时间演化影响的流体流动模型显示,地震后水力各向异性增强。最佳拟合模型显示,虽然断层带内的垂直水力传导性和比储量都可能增加,但水平水力传导性却很低,这表明断层带是跨断层流的水力屏障,其模型扩散率低至 ∼10-3 m2/s。在断层带的近场(如几百米范围内)进行高保真水文测量,可能是制约断层带特性在断裂前、断裂期间和断裂后的空间和时间演变的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Very-Near-Field Coseismic Fault Pressure Drop and Delayed Postseismic Cross-Fault Flow Induced by Fault Damage From the 2018 M6.3 Hualien, Taiwan Earthquake

Earthquakes can produce rock damage, poroelastic deformation, and ground shaking that modify fault zone hydrogeologic properties. Coseismic and postseismic hydrologic response to the ruptured fault can serve as constraints on hydrogeologic property changes. Here, we document fluid pressure responses to the 2018 M6.3 Hualien, Taiwan earthquake and model the postseismic fault zone hydrology inferred from very-near-fault data. Two groundwater wells located ∼180–250 m from the fault damage zone experienced 10–15 m of groundwater level decline followed by a prolonged (>6 months) recovery. Poroelastic models indicate that strain dilation in the fault's hanging wall can produce water level reductions of several meters. However, the model cannot explain groundwater level change in the footwall nor the delayed postseismic recovery, suggesting fault zone damage played a primary role in both the coseismic and postseismic water level reductions. Fluid flow models incorporating the effects of coseismic fault damage on the temporal evolution of hydrologic fault properties show enhanced hydraulic anisotropy after the earthquake. The best-fit models show that while both vertical hydraulic conductivity and specific storage likely increased within the fault zone, the horizontal hydraulic conductivity is low, suggesting the fault zone behaves as a hydraulic barrier to cross-fault flow with modeled diffusivities as low as ∼10−3 m2/s. High-fidelity hydrologic measurements in the very-near-field of fault zones (e.g., within a few hundred meters) may be a useful tool to constrain the spatial and temporal evolution of fault zone properties before, during, and after rupture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
559
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology. JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields. JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Earth Tides in Reactivating Shallow Faults and Triggering Seafloor Methane Emissions A Novel 3-D Seismic Scattering and Intrinsic Attenuation Tomography and Its Application to Northern Sumatra The Influence of Using a Seismically Inferred Magma Reservoir Geometry in a Volcano Deformation Model for Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat Electrical Conductivity and Sound Velocities of Talc Under High Pressure and High Temperature Conditions and Application to the Subducting Cocos Plate Rapid Gas Bubble Growth in Basaltic Magma as a Source of Deep Long Period Volcanic Earthquakes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1