{"title":"可接受药物手术的 I 期 NSCLC 患者接受 SBRT 或手术后的存活率和复发率。","authors":"Michael Snider , Joseph K. Salama , Matthew Boyer","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Surgery is the standard of care for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with SBRT reserved for patients who are not surgical candidates. We hypothesized overall survival (OS), lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), progression free survival (PFS), and recurrence rates following SBRT or surgery in medically operable patients with Stage I NSCLC from the Veterans’ Health Care System (VAHS) would be equivalent.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Medically operable patients diagnosed with Stage I NSCLC between 2000–2020 from the VAHS, determined by an FEV1 or DLCO > 60 % of predicted and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 0 or 1, treated with SBRT or surgery were identified. SBRT patients were propensity score matched in a 1:1:1 ratio to those undergoing resection (SBRT:lobectomy:sub-lobar resection). OS, LCSS, and PFS and site of recurrence were determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>103 patients were included in each cohort. With a median follow-up of 7.9 years 5-year OS for all patients was 51 % (95 % CI 46–57 %). After propensity score matching, OS (HR 2.08, 1.59), LCSS (HR 2.28, 1.97), and PFS (1.97, 1.45) were significantly worse with SBRT compared to either lobectomy or sub-lobar resection, respectively, (p < 0.05 for each comparison). Regional recurrence was significantly higher following SBRT (15.5 % vs 6.8 % or 4.9 %; <em>p</em> < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in local (28.2 % vs 21.4 % or 21.4 %; <em>p</em> > 0.05) or distant recurrence (10.7 % vs 9.7 % or 13.6 %; <em>p</em> > 0.05) when compared to lobectomy or sub-lobar resection, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In medically operable patients, OS, LCSS, and PFS following either lobectomy or sub-lobar resection were superior to that for SBRT for Stage I NSCLC, likely due in part to higher regional recurrence following SBRT. This suggests that pulmonary function test results and CCI alone are insufficient to define a cohort of medically operable patients suited for SBRT. These data support strategies to overcome regional recurrences seen with SBRT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107962"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival and recurrence rates following SBRT or surgery in medically operable Stage I NSCLC\",\"authors\":\"Michael Snider , Joseph K. Salama , Matthew Boyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107962\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Surgery is the standard of care for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with SBRT reserved for patients who are not surgical candidates. We hypothesized overall survival (OS), lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), progression free survival (PFS), and recurrence rates following SBRT or surgery in medically operable patients with Stage I NSCLC from the Veterans’ Health Care System (VAHS) would be equivalent.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Medically operable patients diagnosed with Stage I NSCLC between 2000–2020 from the VAHS, determined by an FEV1 or DLCO > 60 % of predicted and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 0 or 1, treated with SBRT or surgery were identified. SBRT patients were propensity score matched in a 1:1:1 ratio to those undergoing resection (SBRT:lobectomy:sub-lobar resection). OS, LCSS, and PFS and site of recurrence were determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>103 patients were included in each cohort. With a median follow-up of 7.9 years 5-year OS for all patients was 51 % (95 % CI 46–57 %). After propensity score matching, OS (HR 2.08, 1.59), LCSS (HR 2.28, 1.97), and PFS (1.97, 1.45) were significantly worse with SBRT compared to either lobectomy or sub-lobar resection, respectively, (p < 0.05 for each comparison). Regional recurrence was significantly higher following SBRT (15.5 % vs 6.8 % or 4.9 %; <em>p</em> < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in local (28.2 % vs 21.4 % or 21.4 %; <em>p</em> > 0.05) or distant recurrence (10.7 % vs 9.7 % or 13.6 %; <em>p</em> > 0.05) when compared to lobectomy or sub-lobar resection, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In medically operable patients, OS, LCSS, and PFS following either lobectomy or sub-lobar resection were superior to that for SBRT for Stage I NSCLC, likely due in part to higher regional recurrence following SBRT. This suggests that pulmonary function test results and CCI alone are insufficient to define a cohort of medically operable patients suited for SBRT. These data support strategies to overcome regional recurrences seen with SBRT.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung Cancer\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224004963\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224004963","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Survival and recurrence rates following SBRT or surgery in medically operable Stage I NSCLC
Objectives
Surgery is the standard of care for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with SBRT reserved for patients who are not surgical candidates. We hypothesized overall survival (OS), lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), progression free survival (PFS), and recurrence rates following SBRT or surgery in medically operable patients with Stage I NSCLC from the Veterans’ Health Care System (VAHS) would be equivalent.
Materials and methods
Medically operable patients diagnosed with Stage I NSCLC between 2000–2020 from the VAHS, determined by an FEV1 or DLCO > 60 % of predicted and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 0 or 1, treated with SBRT or surgery were identified. SBRT patients were propensity score matched in a 1:1:1 ratio to those undergoing resection (SBRT:lobectomy:sub-lobar resection). OS, LCSS, and PFS and site of recurrence were determined.
Results
103 patients were included in each cohort. With a median follow-up of 7.9 years 5-year OS for all patients was 51 % (95 % CI 46–57 %). After propensity score matching, OS (HR 2.08, 1.59), LCSS (HR 2.28, 1.97), and PFS (1.97, 1.45) were significantly worse with SBRT compared to either lobectomy or sub-lobar resection, respectively, (p < 0.05 for each comparison). Regional recurrence was significantly higher following SBRT (15.5 % vs 6.8 % or 4.9 %; p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in local (28.2 % vs 21.4 % or 21.4 %; p > 0.05) or distant recurrence (10.7 % vs 9.7 % or 13.6 %; p > 0.05) when compared to lobectomy or sub-lobar resection, respectively.
Conclusion
In medically operable patients, OS, LCSS, and PFS following either lobectomy or sub-lobar resection were superior to that for SBRT for Stage I NSCLC, likely due in part to higher regional recurrence following SBRT. This suggests that pulmonary function test results and CCI alone are insufficient to define a cohort of medically operable patients suited for SBRT. These data support strategies to overcome regional recurrences seen with SBRT.
期刊介绍:
Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.