{"title":"考虑到非达西流的软土地基不透水柱固结的分析解决方案","authors":"Kuo Li, Mengmeng Lu, Jinxin Sun","doi":"10.1002/nag.3857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cohesive material columns have been extensively used in foundation improvement projects to enhance the bearing capacity of composite foundations and mitigate post‐construction settlement. However, the low permeability of cohesive material columns restricts the dissipation of pore water primarily through the top surface of the foundation, potentially resulting in longer drainage paths compared to foundations treated with granular material columns or vertical drains. Moreover, the impact of non‐Darcian flow within soils on consolidation behavior becomes increasingly pronounced as the drainage path increases. Consequently, a novel analytical model for the consolidation of impervious column‐assisted foundations is established, which can incorporate the seepage model accounting for the initial hydraulic gradient. The accuracy and reasonableness of the obtained solution are then validated by conducting a comparative analysis with existing models and through a detailed case study. Furthermore, a parametric analysis is conducted to delve into the influence of several crucial factors on the consolidation performance. The findings demonstrate that non‐Darcian flow has a greater influence on composite foundations compared to natural foundations. Additionally, the threshold value of the well‐diameter ratio decreases with the increase in the initial hydraulic gradient. Finally, the final seepage front remains at a shallower position when the column–soil modulus ratio becomes larger, and the influence of non‐Darcian flow on the consolidation rate becomes more pronounced.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical Solutions for Consolidation of Soft Ground With Impervious Columns Considering Non‐Darcian Flow\",\"authors\":\"Kuo Li, Mengmeng Lu, Jinxin Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nag.3857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cohesive material columns have been extensively used in foundation improvement projects to enhance the bearing capacity of composite foundations and mitigate post‐construction settlement. However, the low permeability of cohesive material columns restricts the dissipation of pore water primarily through the top surface of the foundation, potentially resulting in longer drainage paths compared to foundations treated with granular material columns or vertical drains. Moreover, the impact of non‐Darcian flow within soils on consolidation behavior becomes increasingly pronounced as the drainage path increases. Consequently, a novel analytical model for the consolidation of impervious column‐assisted foundations is established, which can incorporate the seepage model accounting for the initial hydraulic gradient. The accuracy and reasonableness of the obtained solution are then validated by conducting a comparative analysis with existing models and through a detailed case study. Furthermore, a parametric analysis is conducted to delve into the influence of several crucial factors on the consolidation performance. The findings demonstrate that non‐Darcian flow has a greater influence on composite foundations compared to natural foundations. Additionally, the threshold value of the well‐diameter ratio decreases with the increase in the initial hydraulic gradient. Finally, the final seepage front remains at a shallower position when the column–soil modulus ratio becomes larger, and the influence of non‐Darcian flow on the consolidation rate becomes more pronounced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3857\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3857","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analytical Solutions for Consolidation of Soft Ground With Impervious Columns Considering Non‐Darcian Flow
Cohesive material columns have been extensively used in foundation improvement projects to enhance the bearing capacity of composite foundations and mitigate post‐construction settlement. However, the low permeability of cohesive material columns restricts the dissipation of pore water primarily through the top surface of the foundation, potentially resulting in longer drainage paths compared to foundations treated with granular material columns or vertical drains. Moreover, the impact of non‐Darcian flow within soils on consolidation behavior becomes increasingly pronounced as the drainage path increases. Consequently, a novel analytical model for the consolidation of impervious column‐assisted foundations is established, which can incorporate the seepage model accounting for the initial hydraulic gradient. The accuracy and reasonableness of the obtained solution are then validated by conducting a comparative analysis with existing models and through a detailed case study. Furthermore, a parametric analysis is conducted to delve into the influence of several crucial factors on the consolidation performance. The findings demonstrate that non‐Darcian flow has a greater influence on composite foundations compared to natural foundations. Additionally, the threshold value of the well‐diameter ratio decreases with the increase in the initial hydraulic gradient. Finally, the final seepage front remains at a shallower position when the column–soil modulus ratio becomes larger, and the influence of non‐Darcian flow on the consolidation rate becomes more pronounced.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.