{"title":"对不同骨结合植入物基底、材料厚度和树脂粘结剂类型中氧化锆颜色的评估。","authors":"Aida Seyidaliyeva, Andreas Zenthöfer, Stefan Rues","doi":"10.1155/2024/8696008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate the impact of surface conditioning of titanium, zirconia thickness, and cement type on the final color of zirconia luted to the titanium. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 192 grade 5 titanium specimens with the final dimensions 10 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm were fabricated and subjected to four different surface conditioning including, that is, sandblasting, etching, and anodization. In addition, 192 zirconia specimens with the same dimensions as the titanium specimens but altered thicknesses of 0.7 (<i>n</i> = 96) and 1.0 (<i>n</i> = 96) mm were fabricated using 5Y-TZP zirconia. Color as expressed by <i>L</i> <sup><i>∗</i></sup> (lightness), <i>a</i> <sup><i>∗</i></sup> (red-green axis), and <i>b</i> <sup><i>∗</i></sup> (blue-yellow axis) of titanium and zirconia specimens as well as the joined titanium-zirconia complex, total assembly (Panavia V5 clear, PC; opaque, PO, each <i>n</i> = 96) were determined under standardized conditions using a spectroradiometer (SpectraScan P-650). Color differences were calculated using the <i>ΔE</i> <sub>00</sub> formula. ANOVA supplemented with post hoc Tukey test for group comparisons was compiled to estimate possible effects of titanium conditioning, zirconia thickness, and type of cement used on the final zirconia color (SPSS Ver. 28; <i>α</i> = 0.05). <b>Results:</b> All investigated factors affected the zirconia color of the total assembly (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Using PO mean values of all groups were still close to baseline colors (<i>ΔE</i> <sub>00</sub> between 5.5 and 6.2). When using PC, the final color was significantly altered, irrespective of the other parameters. Specimens luted with PO appeared lighter, less reddish (<i>a</i> <sup><i>∗</i></sup> was affected predominately by sample thickness), and more bluish, while luting with PC resulted in reduced lightness combined with large shifts along the red and yellow axes. <b>Significance:</b> Color changes of zirconia luted to titanium are primarily affected by the color of the substrate if a translucent cement was used. Vice versa, the application of an opaque cement effectively masked the dark substrate color. Substrate color and choice of cement have to be taken into consideration when performing shade selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2024 ","pages":"8696008"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Color of Zirconia in Different Substrates of Osseointegrated Implants, Thickness of Materials and Types of Resin Cements.\",\"authors\":\"Aida Seyidaliyeva, Andreas Zenthöfer, Stefan Rues\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/8696008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate the impact of surface conditioning of titanium, zirconia thickness, and cement type on the final color of zirconia luted to the titanium. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 192 grade 5 titanium specimens with the final dimensions 10 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm were fabricated and subjected to four different surface conditioning including, that is, sandblasting, etching, and anodization. In addition, 192 zirconia specimens with the same dimensions as the titanium specimens but altered thicknesses of 0.7 (<i>n</i> = 96) and 1.0 (<i>n</i> = 96) mm were fabricated using 5Y-TZP zirconia. Color as expressed by <i>L</i> <sup><i>∗</i></sup> (lightness), <i>a</i> <sup><i>∗</i></sup> (red-green axis), and <i>b</i> <sup><i>∗</i></sup> (blue-yellow axis) of titanium and zirconia specimens as well as the joined titanium-zirconia complex, total assembly (Panavia V5 clear, PC; opaque, PO, each <i>n</i> = 96) were determined under standardized conditions using a spectroradiometer (SpectraScan P-650). Color differences were calculated using the <i>ΔE</i> <sub>00</sub> formula. ANOVA supplemented with post hoc Tukey test for group comparisons was compiled to estimate possible effects of titanium conditioning, zirconia thickness, and type of cement used on the final zirconia color (SPSS Ver. 28; <i>α</i> = 0.05). <b>Results:</b> All investigated factors affected the zirconia color of the total assembly (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Using PO mean values of all groups were still close to baseline colors (<i>ΔE</i> <sub>00</sub> between 5.5 and 6.2). When using PC, the final color was significantly altered, irrespective of the other parameters. Specimens luted with PO appeared lighter, less reddish (<i>a</i> <sup><i>∗</i></sup> was affected predominately by sample thickness), and more bluish, while luting with PC resulted in reduced lightness combined with large shifts along the red and yellow axes. <b>Significance:</b> Color changes of zirconia luted to titanium are primarily affected by the color of the substrate if a translucent cement was used. Vice versa, the application of an opaque cement effectively masked the dark substrate color. Substrate color and choice of cement have to be taken into consideration when performing shade selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"8696008\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458321/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8696008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8696008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估钛的表面调理、氧化锆厚度和水泥类型对与钛粘结的氧化锆最终颜色的影响。方法:制作了 192 个最终尺寸为 10 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm 的 5 级钛试样,并对其进行了四种不同的表面处理,包括喷砂、蚀刻和阳极氧化。此外,还使用 5Y-TZP 氧化锆制作了 192 个氧化锆试样,其尺寸与钛试样相同,但厚度分别为 0.7 毫米(n = 96)和 1.0 毫米(n = 96)。在标准化条件下,使用分光辐射计 (SpectraScan P-650) 测定钛和氧化锆试样以及钛-氧化锆连接复合体总装配(Panavia V5 透明,PC;不透明,PO,各 n = 96)的颜色,颜色用 L ∗(亮度)、a ∗(红-绿轴)和 b ∗(蓝-黄轴)表示。色差用 ΔE 00 公式计算。为估计钛调节、氧化锆厚度和使用的水门汀类型对最终氧化锆颜色可能产生的影响,我们编制了方差分析,并对组间比较进行了Tukey事后检验(SPSS Ver.28;α = 0.05)。结果:所有调查因素都会影响整个组件的氧化锆颜色(p < 0.001)。使用 PO 时,所有组的平均值仍接近基线色(ΔE 00 介于 5.5 和 6.2 之间)。使用 PC 时,无论其他参数如何,最终颜色都会发生显著变化。用 PO 粘合的试样颜色更浅、更不偏红(a ∗ 主要受试样厚度的影响)、更偏蓝,而用 PC 粘合的试样颜色更浅,同时沿红轴和黄轴有较大偏移。意义重大:如果使用半透明骨水泥,氧化锆与钛粘结后的颜色变化主要受基底颜色的影响。反之亦然,使用不透明的粘接剂可有效掩盖深色基底的颜色。在进行色调选择时,必须考虑基底颜色和水泥的选择。
Evaluation of the Color of Zirconia in Different Substrates of Osseointegrated Implants, Thickness of Materials and Types of Resin Cements.
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of surface conditioning of titanium, zirconia thickness, and cement type on the final color of zirconia luted to the titanium. Methods: A total of 192 grade 5 titanium specimens with the final dimensions 10 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm were fabricated and subjected to four different surface conditioning including, that is, sandblasting, etching, and anodization. In addition, 192 zirconia specimens with the same dimensions as the titanium specimens but altered thicknesses of 0.7 (n = 96) and 1.0 (n = 96) mm were fabricated using 5Y-TZP zirconia. Color as expressed by L∗ (lightness), a∗ (red-green axis), and b∗ (blue-yellow axis) of titanium and zirconia specimens as well as the joined titanium-zirconia complex, total assembly (Panavia V5 clear, PC; opaque, PO, each n = 96) were determined under standardized conditions using a spectroradiometer (SpectraScan P-650). Color differences were calculated using the ΔE00 formula. ANOVA supplemented with post hoc Tukey test for group comparisons was compiled to estimate possible effects of titanium conditioning, zirconia thickness, and type of cement used on the final zirconia color (SPSS Ver. 28; α = 0.05). Results: All investigated factors affected the zirconia color of the total assembly (p < 0.001). Using PO mean values of all groups were still close to baseline colors (ΔE00 between 5.5 and 6.2). When using PC, the final color was significantly altered, irrespective of the other parameters. Specimens luted with PO appeared lighter, less reddish (a∗ was affected predominately by sample thickness), and more bluish, while luting with PC resulted in reduced lightness combined with large shifts along the red and yellow axes. Significance: Color changes of zirconia luted to titanium are primarily affected by the color of the substrate if a translucent cement was used. Vice versa, the application of an opaque cement effectively masked the dark substrate color. Substrate color and choice of cement have to be taken into consideration when performing shade selection.