美国 COVID-19 住院患者使用托昔单抗对健康公平的影响:分布式成本效益分析》(The Impact of Tocilizumab Coverage on Health Equity for Inpatient Patients with COVID-19: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis)。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS PharmacoEconomics Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1007/s40273-024-01436-1
Stacey Kowal, Katherine L Rosettie
{"title":"美国 COVID-19 住院患者使用托昔单抗对健康公平的影响:分布式成本效益分析》(The Impact of Tocilizumab Coverage on Health Equity for Inpatient Patients with COVID-19: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis)。","authors":"Stacey Kowal, Katherine L Rosettie","doi":"10.1007/s40273-024-01436-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate how coverage of tocilizumab for inpatients with COVID-19 from 2021 to present impacted health equity in the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A published, payer-perspective, distributional cost-effectiveness analysis for inpatient COVID-19 treatments was adapted to include information on baseline health disparities across 25 equity-relevant subgroups based on race and ethnicity (5 census-based groups), and county-level social vulnerability (5 geographic quintiles). The underlying cost-effectiveness analysis was updated to reflect patient characteristics at admission, standard of care outcomes, tocilizumab efficacy, and contemporary unit costs. The distributional cost-effectiveness analysis inputs for COVID-19 hospitalization and subgroup risk adjustments based on social vulnerability were derived from published estimates. Opportunity costs were estimated by converting total tocilizumab spend into quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), distributed equally across subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tocilizumab treatment was cost effective across all subgroups. Treatment resulted in larger relative QALY gains in more socially vulnerable subgroups than less socially vulnerable subgroups, given higher hospitalization rates and inpatient mortality. Using an opportunity cost threshold of US$150,000/QALY and an Atkinson index of 11, tocilizumab was estimated to have improved social welfare by increasing population health (53,252 QALYs gained) and reducing existing overall US health inequalities by 0.003% since 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of tocilizumab for COVID-19 since 2021 increased population health while improving health equity, as more patients with lower baseline health were eligible for treatment and received larger relative health gains. Future equitable access to tocilizumab for inpatients with COVID-19 is expected to lead to continued increases in population health and reductions in disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19807,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Tocilizumab Coverage on Health Equity for Inpatients with COVID-19 in the USA: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Stacey Kowal, Katherine L Rosettie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40273-024-01436-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate how coverage of tocilizumab for inpatients with COVID-19 from 2021 to present impacted health equity in the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A published, payer-perspective, distributional cost-effectiveness analysis for inpatient COVID-19 treatments was adapted to include information on baseline health disparities across 25 equity-relevant subgroups based on race and ethnicity (5 census-based groups), and county-level social vulnerability (5 geographic quintiles). The underlying cost-effectiveness analysis was updated to reflect patient characteristics at admission, standard of care outcomes, tocilizumab efficacy, and contemporary unit costs. The distributional cost-effectiveness analysis inputs for COVID-19 hospitalization and subgroup risk adjustments based on social vulnerability were derived from published estimates. Opportunity costs were estimated by converting total tocilizumab spend into quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), distributed equally across subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tocilizumab treatment was cost effective across all subgroups. Treatment resulted in larger relative QALY gains in more socially vulnerable subgroups than less socially vulnerable subgroups, given higher hospitalization rates and inpatient mortality. Using an opportunity cost threshold of US$150,000/QALY and an Atkinson index of 11, tocilizumab was estimated to have improved social welfare by increasing population health (53,252 QALYs gained) and reducing existing overall US health inequalities by 0.003% since 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of tocilizumab for COVID-19 since 2021 increased population health while improving health equity, as more patients with lower baseline health were eligible for treatment and received larger relative health gains. Future equitable access to tocilizumab for inpatients with COVID-19 is expected to lead to continued increases in population health and reductions in disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PharmacoEconomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PharmacoEconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-024-01436-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-024-01436-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们进行了一项分布式成本效益分析,以评估 2021 年至今托西珠单抗对美国 COVID-19 住院患者健康公平的影响:我们进行了一项分布式成本效益分析,以评估 2021 年至今托西珠单抗对美国 COVID-19 住院患者的健康公平的影响:对已发表的针对住院患者 COVID-19 治疗的支付方前瞻性分布式成本效益分析进行了调整,纳入了基于种族和民族(5 个基于人口普查的群体)以及县级社会脆弱性(5 个地理五分位数)的 25 个公平相关亚群的基线健康差异信息。对基础成本效益分析进行了更新,以反映入院时的患者特征、标准护理结果、托珠单抗疗效和当代单位成本。COVID-19 住院治疗的分布成本效益分析输入值和基于社会脆弱性的亚组风险调整值均来自已公布的估算值。机会成本是通过将替西利珠单抗的总花费转换为质量调整生命年(QALYs)来估算的,在亚组中平均分配:结果:在所有亚组中,托西珠单抗治疗都具有成本效益。由于住院率和住院死亡率较高,社会弱势亚组的治疗相对质量调整生命年收益大于社会弱势亚组。使用机会成本阈值150,000美元/QALY和阿特金森指数11,估计托西珠单抗通过提高人口健康水平(53,252 QALYs收益)和自2021年以来将美国现有的整体健康不平等减少0.003%,从而改善了社会福利:自 2021 年以来,使用托西珠单抗治疗 COVID-19 增加了人口健康,同时改善了健康公平,因为更多基线健康水平较低的患者有资格接受治疗,并获得了更大的相对健康收益。未来,COVID-19 住院患者公平获得西利珠单抗有望继续提高人群健康水平并减少差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Tocilizumab Coverage on Health Equity for Inpatients with COVID-19 in the USA: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Objectives: We conducted a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate how coverage of tocilizumab for inpatients with COVID-19 from 2021 to present impacted health equity in the USA.

Methods: A published, payer-perspective, distributional cost-effectiveness analysis for inpatient COVID-19 treatments was adapted to include information on baseline health disparities across 25 equity-relevant subgroups based on race and ethnicity (5 census-based groups), and county-level social vulnerability (5 geographic quintiles). The underlying cost-effectiveness analysis was updated to reflect patient characteristics at admission, standard of care outcomes, tocilizumab efficacy, and contemporary unit costs. The distributional cost-effectiveness analysis inputs for COVID-19 hospitalization and subgroup risk adjustments based on social vulnerability were derived from published estimates. Opportunity costs were estimated by converting total tocilizumab spend into quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), distributed equally across subgroups.

Results: Tocilizumab treatment was cost effective across all subgroups. Treatment resulted in larger relative QALY gains in more socially vulnerable subgroups than less socially vulnerable subgroups, given higher hospitalization rates and inpatient mortality. Using an opportunity cost threshold of US$150,000/QALY and an Atkinson index of 11, tocilizumab was estimated to have improved social welfare by increasing population health (53,252 QALYs gained) and reducing existing overall US health inequalities by 0.003% since 2021.

Conclusions: Use of tocilizumab for COVID-19 since 2021 increased population health while improving health equity, as more patients with lower baseline health were eligible for treatment and received larger relative health gains. Future equitable access to tocilizumab for inpatients with COVID-19 is expected to lead to continued increases in population health and reductions in disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PharmacoEconomics
PharmacoEconomics 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics is the benchmark journal for peer-reviewed, authoritative and practical articles on the application of pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life assessment to optimum drug therapy and health outcomes. An invaluable source of applied pharmacoeconomic original research and educational material for the healthcare decision maker. PharmacoEconomics is dedicated to the clear communication of complex pharmacoeconomic issues related to patient care and drug utilization. PharmacoEconomics offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article.
期刊最新文献
Design and Features of Pricing and Payment Schemes for Health Technologies: A Scoping Review and a Proposal for a Flexible Need-Driven Classification. Economic Burden Associated with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the United States. The Impact of Tocilizumab Coverage on Health Equity for Inpatients with COVID-19 in the USA: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Managed Entry Agreements for High-Cost, One-Off Potentially Curative Therapies: A Framework and Calculation Tool to Determine Their Suitability. How Much Better is Faster? Empirical Tests of QALY Assumptions in Health-Outcome Sequences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1