SARS-CoV-2感染后神经系统急性后遗症中白质的宏观和微观结构差异

Erin E O'Connor, Rosangela Salerno-Goncalves, Nikita Rednam, Rory O'Brien, Peter Rock, Andrea R Levine, Thomas A Zeffiro
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2感染后神经系统急性后遗症中白质的宏观和微观结构差异","authors":"Erin E O'Connor, Rosangela Salerno-Goncalves, Nikita Rednam, Rory O'Brien, Peter Rock, Andrea R Levine, Thomas A Zeffiro","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Neuropsychiatric complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection, also known as neurologic postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (NeuroPASC), affect 10%-60% of infected individuals. There is growing evidence that NeuroPASC is a multi system immune dysregulation disease affecting the brain. The behavioral manifestations of NeuroPASC, such as impaired processing speed, executive function, memory retrieval, and sustained attention, suggest widespread WM involvement. Although previous work has documented WM damage following acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, its involvement in NeuroPASC is less clear. We hypothesized that macrostructural and microstructural WM differences in NeuroPASC participants would accompany cognitive and immune system differences.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study, we screened a total of 159 potential participants and enrolled 72 participants, with 41 asymptomatic controls (NoCOVID) and 31 NeuroPASC participants matched for age, sex, and education. Exclusion criteria included neurologic disorders unrelated to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Assessments included clinical symptom questionnaires, psychometric tests, brain MRI measures, and peripheral cytokine levels. Statistical modeling included separate multivariable regression analyses of GM/WM/CSF volume, WM microstructure, cognitive, and cytokine concentration between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NeuroPASC participants had larger cerebral WM volume than NoCOVID controls (β = 0.229; 95% CI: 0.017-0.441; <i>t</i> = 2.16; <i>P</i> = .035). The most pronounced effects were in the prefrontal and anterior temporal WM. NeuroPASC participants also exhibited higher WM mean kurtosis, consistent with ongoing neuroinflammation. NeuroPASC participants had more self-reported symptoms, including headache, and lower performance on measures of attention, concentration, verbal learning, and processing speed. A multivariate profile analysis of the cytokine panel showed different group cytokine profiles (Wald-type-statistic = 44.6, <i>P</i> = .046), with interferon (IFN)-λ1 and IFN-λ2/3 levels higher in the NeuroPASC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NeuroPASC participants reported symptoms of lower concentration, higher fatigue, and impaired cognition compatible with WM syndrome. Psychometric testing confirmed these findings. NeuroPASC participants exhibited larger cerebral WM volume and higher WM mean kurtosis than NoCOVID controls. These findings suggest that immune dysregulation could influence WM properties to produce WM volume increases and consequent cognitive effects and headaches. Further work will be needed to establish mechanistic links among these variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macro- and Microstructural White Matter Differences in Neurologic Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.\",\"authors\":\"Erin E O'Connor, Rosangela Salerno-Goncalves, Nikita Rednam, Rory O'Brien, Peter Rock, Andrea R Levine, Thomas A Zeffiro\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A8481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Neuropsychiatric complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection, also known as neurologic postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (NeuroPASC), affect 10%-60% of infected individuals. There is growing evidence that NeuroPASC is a multi system immune dysregulation disease affecting the brain. The behavioral manifestations of NeuroPASC, such as impaired processing speed, executive function, memory retrieval, and sustained attention, suggest widespread WM involvement. Although previous work has documented WM damage following acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, its involvement in NeuroPASC is less clear. We hypothesized that macrostructural and microstructural WM differences in NeuroPASC participants would accompany cognitive and immune system differences.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study, we screened a total of 159 potential participants and enrolled 72 participants, with 41 asymptomatic controls (NoCOVID) and 31 NeuroPASC participants matched for age, sex, and education. Exclusion criteria included neurologic disorders unrelated to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Assessments included clinical symptom questionnaires, psychometric tests, brain MRI measures, and peripheral cytokine levels. Statistical modeling included separate multivariable regression analyses of GM/WM/CSF volume, WM microstructure, cognitive, and cytokine concentration between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NeuroPASC participants had larger cerebral WM volume than NoCOVID controls (β = 0.229; 95% CI: 0.017-0.441; <i>t</i> = 2.16; <i>P</i> = .035). The most pronounced effects were in the prefrontal and anterior temporal WM. NeuroPASC participants also exhibited higher WM mean kurtosis, consistent with ongoing neuroinflammation. NeuroPASC participants had more self-reported symptoms, including headache, and lower performance on measures of attention, concentration, verbal learning, and processing speed. A multivariate profile analysis of the cytokine panel showed different group cytokine profiles (Wald-type-statistic = 44.6, <i>P</i> = .046), with interferon (IFN)-λ1 and IFN-λ2/3 levels higher in the NeuroPASC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NeuroPASC participants reported symptoms of lower concentration, higher fatigue, and impaired cognition compatible with WM syndrome. Psychometric testing confirmed these findings. NeuroPASC participants exhibited larger cerebral WM volume and higher WM mean kurtosis than NoCOVID controls. These findings suggest that immune dysregulation could influence WM properties to produce WM volume increases and consequent cognitive effects and headaches. Further work will be needed to establish mechanistic links among these variables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:SARS-CoV-2 感染引起的神经精神并发症(又称 SARS-CoV-2 感染急性后遗症(NeuroPASC))影响 10%-60%的感染者。越来越多的证据表明,NeuroPASC 是一种影响大脑的多系统免疫失调疾病。NeuroPASC 的行为表现,如处理速度、执行功能、记忆检索和持续注意力受损,表明广泛涉及 WM。虽然之前的研究已经记录了急性 SARS-CoV-2 感染后的 WM 损伤,但其在 NeuroPASC 中的参与还不太清楚。我们假设神经性帕斯卡患者的宏观和微观WM结构差异将伴随认知和免疫系统的差异:在一项横断面研究中,我们共筛选了 159 名潜在参与者,并招募了 72 名参与者,其中包括 41 名无症状对照者(NoCOVID)和 31 名年龄、性别和教育程度匹配的 NeuroPASC 参与者。排除标准包括与 SARS-CoV-2 感染无关的神经系统疾病。评估包括临床症状问卷、心理测试、脑磁共振成像测量和外周细胞因子水平。统计建模包括对各组间差异的GM/WM/CSF体积、WM微结构、认知能力和细胞因子浓度进行单独的多变量回归分析:NeuroPASC参与者的大脑WM体积大于NoCOVID对照组(β = 0.229; 95% CI: 0.017-0.441; t = 2.16; P = .035)。前额叶和前颞叶 WM 的影响最为明显。NeuroPASC 参与者的 WM 平均峰度也更高,这与持续的神经炎症相符。NeuroPASC 参与者有更多的自我报告症状,包括头痛,并且在注意力、集中力、语言学习和处理速度方面表现较差。细胞因子小组的多变量概况分析显示,各组的细胞因子概况不同(Wald-type-statistic = 44.6,P = .046),NeuroPASC组的干扰素(IFN)-λ1和IFN-λ2/3水平更高:结论:NeuroPASC 参与者报告了与 WM 综合征相符的注意力不集中、过度疲劳和认知能力受损等症状。心理测试证实了这些发现。与 NoCOVID 对照组相比,NeuroPASC 参与者的大脑 WM 容量更大,WM 平均峰度更高。这些研究结果表明,免疫失调可能会影响 WM 的特性,从而导致 WM 体积增大,进而影响认知和头痛。要建立这些变量之间的机理联系,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Macro- and Microstructural White Matter Differences in Neurologic Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Background and purpose: Neuropsychiatric complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection, also known as neurologic postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (NeuroPASC), affect 10%-60% of infected individuals. There is growing evidence that NeuroPASC is a multi system immune dysregulation disease affecting the brain. The behavioral manifestations of NeuroPASC, such as impaired processing speed, executive function, memory retrieval, and sustained attention, suggest widespread WM involvement. Although previous work has documented WM damage following acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, its involvement in NeuroPASC is less clear. We hypothesized that macrostructural and microstructural WM differences in NeuroPASC participants would accompany cognitive and immune system differences.

Materials and methods: In a cross-sectional study, we screened a total of 159 potential participants and enrolled 72 participants, with 41 asymptomatic controls (NoCOVID) and 31 NeuroPASC participants matched for age, sex, and education. Exclusion criteria included neurologic disorders unrelated to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Assessments included clinical symptom questionnaires, psychometric tests, brain MRI measures, and peripheral cytokine levels. Statistical modeling included separate multivariable regression analyses of GM/WM/CSF volume, WM microstructure, cognitive, and cytokine concentration between-group differences.

Results: NeuroPASC participants had larger cerebral WM volume than NoCOVID controls (β = 0.229; 95% CI: 0.017-0.441; t = 2.16; P = .035). The most pronounced effects were in the prefrontal and anterior temporal WM. NeuroPASC participants also exhibited higher WM mean kurtosis, consistent with ongoing neuroinflammation. NeuroPASC participants had more self-reported symptoms, including headache, and lower performance on measures of attention, concentration, verbal learning, and processing speed. A multivariate profile analysis of the cytokine panel showed different group cytokine profiles (Wald-type-statistic = 44.6, P = .046), with interferon (IFN)-λ1 and IFN-λ2/3 levels higher in the NeuroPASC group.

Conclusions: NeuroPASC participants reported symptoms of lower concentration, higher fatigue, and impaired cognition compatible with WM syndrome. Psychometric testing confirmed these findings. NeuroPASC participants exhibited larger cerebral WM volume and higher WM mean kurtosis than NoCOVID controls. These findings suggest that immune dysregulation could influence WM properties to produce WM volume increases and consequent cognitive effects and headaches. Further work will be needed to establish mechanistic links among these variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Pretreatment Perfusion Imaging Parameters With 90-Day Excellent Functional Outcomes in Anterior Circulation Distal Medium Vessel Occlusion Stroke. Deep learning-based algorithm for automatic quantification of nigrosome-1 and Parkinsonism classification using susceptibility map-weighted MRI. High wall shear stress is related to complicated AHA lesion type VI plaques in mild to moderate internal carotid artery stenosis - a 3D cardiovascular MRI study. Prevalence of Spinal Meningeal Diverticula in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. Comprehensive Review of Inner Ear Anatomy on Photon-Counting CT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1