基于模型的风险最小化质子治疗规划概念,用于预防低级别胶质瘤患者的脑损伤。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiotherapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110579
H. Sallem , S. Harrabi , E. Traneus , K. Herfarth , J. Debus , J. Bauer
{"title":"基于模型的风险最小化质子治疗规划概念,用于预防低级别胶质瘤患者的脑损伤。","authors":"H. Sallem ,&nbsp;S. Harrabi ,&nbsp;E. Traneus ,&nbsp;K. Herfarth ,&nbsp;J. Debus ,&nbsp;J. Bauer","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Late-occurring contrast-enhancing brain lesions (CEBLs) have been observed on MRI follow-up in low-grade glioma (LGG) patients post-proton therapy. Predictive risk-models for this endpoint identified a dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET<sub>d</sub>)-dependent proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) effect on CEBL occurrence and increased radiosensitivity of the cerebral periventricular region (VP<sub>4mm</sub>). This work aimed to design a stable risk-minimizing treatment planning (TP) concept addressing these intertwined risk factors through a classically formulated optimization problem.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>The concept was developed in RayStation-research 11B IonPG featuring a variable-RBE-based optimizer involving 20 LGG patients with varying target volume localizations and risk-factor contributions. Classical cost functions penalizing dose, dose-volume-histogram points, and equivalent uniform dose were used to formulate the optimization problem, and a new set of structures was introduced to actively spare the VP<sub>4mm</sub>, control high LET<sub>d</sub> regions, and de-escalate the dose outside the gross tumor volume. Target volume coverage and organ-at-risk sparing were robustly evaluated, and Normal Tissue Complication Probabilities (NTCP) for CEBL occurrence were quantified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The concept yielded stable optimization outcomes for all considered subjects. Risk hot spots were successfully mitigated, and an NTCP reduction of up to 79 % was observed compared to conventional TP while maintaining target coverage, demonstrating the feasibility of the chosen model-based approach.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>With the proposed TP protocol, we close the gap between predictive risk-modeling and practical risk-mitigation in the clinic and provide a concept for CEBL avoidance with the potential to advance treatment precision for LGG patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 110579"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A model-based risk-minimizing proton treatment planning concept for brain injury prevention in low-grade glioma patients\",\"authors\":\"H. Sallem ,&nbsp;S. Harrabi ,&nbsp;E. Traneus ,&nbsp;K. Herfarth ,&nbsp;J. Debus ,&nbsp;J. Bauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Late-occurring contrast-enhancing brain lesions (CEBLs) have been observed on MRI follow-up in low-grade glioma (LGG) patients post-proton therapy. Predictive risk-models for this endpoint identified a dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET<sub>d</sub>)-dependent proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) effect on CEBL occurrence and increased radiosensitivity of the cerebral periventricular region (VP<sub>4mm</sub>). This work aimed to design a stable risk-minimizing treatment planning (TP) concept addressing these intertwined risk factors through a classically formulated optimization problem.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>The concept was developed in RayStation-research 11B IonPG featuring a variable-RBE-based optimizer involving 20 LGG patients with varying target volume localizations and risk-factor contributions. Classical cost functions penalizing dose, dose-volume-histogram points, and equivalent uniform dose were used to formulate the optimization problem, and a new set of structures was introduced to actively spare the VP<sub>4mm</sub>, control high LET<sub>d</sub> regions, and de-escalate the dose outside the gross tumor volume. Target volume coverage and organ-at-risk sparing were robustly evaluated, and Normal Tissue Complication Probabilities (NTCP) for CEBL occurrence were quantified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The concept yielded stable optimization outcomes for all considered subjects. Risk hot spots were successfully mitigated, and an NTCP reduction of up to 79 % was observed compared to conventional TP while maintaining target coverage, demonstrating the feasibility of the chosen model-based approach.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>With the proposed TP protocol, we close the gap between predictive risk-modeling and practical risk-mitigation in the clinic and provide a concept for CEBL avoidance with the potential to advance treatment precision for LGG patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiotherapy and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024035576\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024035576","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在质子治疗后对低级别胶质瘤(LGG)患者进行磁共振成像随访时,发现了晚期出现的对比增强脑病变(CEBL)。针对这一终点的预测性风险模型确定了质子相对生物效应(RBE)对CEBL发生的剂量平均线性能量转移(LETd)依赖效应,以及脑室周围区域(VP4mm)放射敏感性的增加。这项工作旨在设计一种稳定的风险最小化治疗计划(TP)概念,通过经典的优化问题来解决这些相互交织的风险因素:该概念是在 RayStation-research 11B IonPG 中开发的,其特点是基于可变 RBE 的优化器,涉及 20 名 LGG 患者,其靶体积定位和风险因素贡献各不相同。在制定优化问题时,使用了惩罚剂量、剂量-体积-柱状图点和等效均匀剂量的经典成本函数,并引入了一套新的结构,以主动切除 VP4mm、控制高 LETd 区域并降低肿瘤总体积外的剂量。对靶体积覆盖率和危险器官疏通进行了稳健评估,并量化了CEBL发生的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP):结果:该概念为所有受试者带来了稳定的优化结果。在保持目标覆盖率的同时,风险热点得到了成功缓解,与传统 TP 相比,NTCP 降低了 79%,这证明了所选基于模型方法的可行性:通过提出的 TP 方案,我们缩小了预测性风险建模与临床实际风险缓解之间的差距,并提供了一种避免 CEBL 的概念,有望提高 LGG 患者的治疗精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A model-based risk-minimizing proton treatment planning concept for brain injury prevention in low-grade glioma patients

Purpose

Late-occurring contrast-enhancing brain lesions (CEBLs) have been observed on MRI follow-up in low-grade glioma (LGG) patients post-proton therapy. Predictive risk-models for this endpoint identified a dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd)-dependent proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) effect on CEBL occurrence and increased radiosensitivity of the cerebral periventricular region (VP4mm). This work aimed to design a stable risk-minimizing treatment planning (TP) concept addressing these intertwined risk factors through a classically formulated optimization problem.

Material and methods

The concept was developed in RayStation-research 11B IonPG featuring a variable-RBE-based optimizer involving 20 LGG patients with varying target volume localizations and risk-factor contributions. Classical cost functions penalizing dose, dose-volume-histogram points, and equivalent uniform dose were used to formulate the optimization problem, and a new set of structures was introduced to actively spare the VP4mm, control high LETd regions, and de-escalate the dose outside the gross tumor volume. Target volume coverage and organ-at-risk sparing were robustly evaluated, and Normal Tissue Complication Probabilities (NTCP) for CEBL occurrence were quantified.

Results

The concept yielded stable optimization outcomes for all considered subjects. Risk hot spots were successfully mitigated, and an NTCP reduction of up to 79 % was observed compared to conventional TP while maintaining target coverage, demonstrating the feasibility of the chosen model-based approach.

Conclusion

With the proposed TP protocol, we close the gap between predictive risk-modeling and practical risk-mitigation in the clinic and provide a concept for CEBL avoidance with the potential to advance treatment precision for LGG patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
期刊最新文献
The indispensable role of peer review in modern radiation oncology Dosimetric impact of sparing base of heart on organ at risk doses during lung radiotherapy Evaluating and reporting LET and RBE-weighted dose in proton therapy for glioma – The Dutch approach A critical reflection of radiotherapy on osseous free flaps in mandibular segmental resection and immediate reconstruction in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: A cohort study Prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1