用于 c-Φ 土中大直径螺旋桩沉降预测的高效机器学习模型

Nur Mohammad Shuman, Mohammad Sadik Khan, Farshad Amini
{"title":"用于 c-Φ 土中大直径螺旋桩沉降预测的高效机器学习模型","authors":"Nur Mohammad Shuman,&nbsp;Mohammad Sadik Khan,&nbsp;Farshad Amini","doi":"10.1007/s43503-024-00028-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Machine learning is frequently used in various geotechnical applications nowadays. This study presents a statistics and machine learning model for settlement prediction of helical piles that relates compressive service load and soil parameters as a group with the pile parameters. Machine learning algorithms such as Decision Trees, Random Forests, AdaBoost, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were used to develop the predictive models. The models were validated using cross-validation techniques and tested on an independent dataset to assess their accuracy and generalizability. Numerical investigation is used here to supplement the field data by simulating various soil conditions and pile geometries that have not been tested in the field. This study compiled numerical results of 3600 models. As the models are well-calibrated and validated, the data from these models can be reasonably assumed to simulate the ground situation. At the end of this study, a comparative analysis of statistic learning and machine learning (ML) was done using the field axial load tests database and numerical investigation on helical piles. It is observed that ML models like Decision Trees and Random Forests provided the better model with R-squared values of 0.92 and 0.96, respectively, for large diameters. The authors believe this study will permit engineers and state agencies to understand this prediction model's efficacy better, resulting in a more resilient approach to designing large-diameter helical piles for the compressive load.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72138,"journal":{"name":"AI in civil engineering","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43503-024-00028-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient machine learning model for settlement prediction of large diameter helical pile in c—Φ soil\",\"authors\":\"Nur Mohammad Shuman,&nbsp;Mohammad Sadik Khan,&nbsp;Farshad Amini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43503-024-00028-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Machine learning is frequently used in various geotechnical applications nowadays. This study presents a statistics and machine learning model for settlement prediction of helical piles that relates compressive service load and soil parameters as a group with the pile parameters. Machine learning algorithms such as Decision Trees, Random Forests, AdaBoost, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were used to develop the predictive models. The models were validated using cross-validation techniques and tested on an independent dataset to assess their accuracy and generalizability. Numerical investigation is used here to supplement the field data by simulating various soil conditions and pile geometries that have not been tested in the field. This study compiled numerical results of 3600 models. As the models are well-calibrated and validated, the data from these models can be reasonably assumed to simulate the ground situation. At the end of this study, a comparative analysis of statistic learning and machine learning (ML) was done using the field axial load tests database and numerical investigation on helical piles. It is observed that ML models like Decision Trees and Random Forests provided the better model with R-squared values of 0.92 and 0.96, respectively, for large diameters. The authors believe this study will permit engineers and state agencies to understand this prediction model's efficacy better, resulting in a more resilient approach to designing large-diameter helical piles for the compressive load.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AI in civil engineering\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43503-024-00028-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AI in civil engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43503-024-00028-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI in civil engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43503-024-00028-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,机器学习已频繁应用于各种岩土工程领域。本研究提出了一种用于螺旋桩沉降预测的统计和机器学习模型,该模型将抗压使用荷载和土壤参数作为一组与桩参数相关联。机器学习算法,如决策树、随机森林、AdaBoost 和人工神经网络 (ANN) 被用来开发预测模型。使用交叉验证技术对模型进行验证,并在独立数据集上进行测试,以评估其准确性和通用性。这里使用了数值调查,通过模拟各种土壤条件和未在现场测试过的桩的几何形状来补充现场数据。本研究汇编了 3600 个模型的数值结果。由于这些模型经过了良好的校准和验证,因此可以合理地认为这些模型的数据模拟了地面情况。研究结束时,利用现场轴向荷载试验数据库和螺旋桩数值研究,对统计学习和机器学习(ML)进行了比较分析。结果表明,决策树和随机森林等机器学习模型提供了更好的模型,对于大直径模型的 R 平方值分别为 0.92 和 0.96。作者认为,这项研究将使工程师和国家机构更好地了解该预测模型的功效,从而在设计大直径螺旋桩承受抗压荷载时采用更具弹性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficient machine learning model for settlement prediction of large diameter helical pile in c—Φ soil

Machine learning is frequently used in various geotechnical applications nowadays. This study presents a statistics and machine learning model for settlement prediction of helical piles that relates compressive service load and soil parameters as a group with the pile parameters. Machine learning algorithms such as Decision Trees, Random Forests, AdaBoost, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were used to develop the predictive models. The models were validated using cross-validation techniques and tested on an independent dataset to assess their accuracy and generalizability. Numerical investigation is used here to supplement the field data by simulating various soil conditions and pile geometries that have not been tested in the field. This study compiled numerical results of 3600 models. As the models are well-calibrated and validated, the data from these models can be reasonably assumed to simulate the ground situation. At the end of this study, a comparative analysis of statistic learning and machine learning (ML) was done using the field axial load tests database and numerical investigation on helical piles. It is observed that ML models like Decision Trees and Random Forests provided the better model with R-squared values of 0.92 and 0.96, respectively, for large diameters. The authors believe this study will permit engineers and state agencies to understand this prediction model's efficacy better, resulting in a more resilient approach to designing large-diameter helical piles for the compressive load.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Feature fusion of single and orthogonal polarized rock images for intelligent lithology identification Estimation of rock strength parameters from petrological contents using tree-based machine learning techniques A review of sustainability assessment of geopolymer concrete through AI-based life cycle analysis Research on slope stability assessment methods: a comparative analysis of limit equilibrium, finite element, and analytical approaches for road embankment stabilization Data-driven analysis in 3D concrete printing: predicting and optimizing construction mixtures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1