A. M. Konvisar, V. O. Mikhailov, V. B. Smirnov, E. P. Timoshkina
{"title":"2021 年 7 月 29 日阿拉斯加 Chignik 地震区域的震后过程:第一部分:建模结果","authors":"A. M. Konvisar, V. O. Mikhailov, V. B. Smirnov, E. P. Timoshkina","doi":"10.1134/S1069351324700563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract</b>—We analyze the postseismic processes in the region of the <i>M</i><sub>w</sub> 8.2 Chignik earthquake, Alaska, which occurred on July 29, 2021. Using the model of the seismic rupture surface constructed in our previous work (Konvisar et al., 2023), we have modeled the viscoelastic relaxation process. The results indicate that by reducing the viscosity of the asthenosphere to 10<sup>18</sup> Pa s we an achieve the displacement velocities that are close to those recorded at the coastal GPS sites. However, the displacements on the islands near the source zone of the earthquake differ significantly not only in magnitude but also in direction. At the same time, the constructed postseismic creep (afterslip) model agrees well with displacement data at the GPS sites and with the line-of-sight (LOS) displacement map derived from radar images taken from the descending orbit of the Sentinel-1A satellite. We also analyze temporal variations of gravity field in the earthquake region. The obtained coseismic anomaly is consistent with the anomaly calculated from the rupture surface model. Isolating the postseismic anomaly it is not yet possible due to the insufficiently long time series of gravity models for the time period after the earthquake. The analysis of the postseismic processes is continued in the second part of this work (Smirnov et al., 2024), where we compare development over time of the postseismic displacements of various GPS sites with the aftershock activity, which allows us to draw conclusions about the creep nature of the postseismic processes in the source region of the Chignik earthquake.</p>","PeriodicalId":602,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth","volume":"60 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postseismic Processes in the Region of the July 29, 2021 Chignik Earthquake, Alaska: Part I. Modeling Results\",\"authors\":\"A. M. Konvisar, V. O. Mikhailov, V. B. Smirnov, E. P. Timoshkina\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S1069351324700563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Abstract</b>—We analyze the postseismic processes in the region of the <i>M</i><sub>w</sub> 8.2 Chignik earthquake, Alaska, which occurred on July 29, 2021. Using the model of the seismic rupture surface constructed in our previous work (Konvisar et al., 2023), we have modeled the viscoelastic relaxation process. The results indicate that by reducing the viscosity of the asthenosphere to 10<sup>18</sup> Pa s we an achieve the displacement velocities that are close to those recorded at the coastal GPS sites. However, the displacements on the islands near the source zone of the earthquake differ significantly not only in magnitude but also in direction. At the same time, the constructed postseismic creep (afterslip) model agrees well with displacement data at the GPS sites and with the line-of-sight (LOS) displacement map derived from radar images taken from the descending orbit of the Sentinel-1A satellite. We also analyze temporal variations of gravity field in the earthquake region. The obtained coseismic anomaly is consistent with the anomaly calculated from the rupture surface model. Isolating the postseismic anomaly it is not yet possible due to the insufficiently long time series of gravity models for the time period after the earthquake. The analysis of the postseismic processes is continued in the second part of this work (Smirnov et al., 2024), where we compare development over time of the postseismic displacements of various GPS sites with the aftershock activity, which allows us to draw conclusions about the creep nature of the postseismic processes in the source region of the Chignik earthquake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth\",\"volume\":\"60 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1069351324700563\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1069351324700563","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Postseismic Processes in the Region of the July 29, 2021 Chignik Earthquake, Alaska: Part I. Modeling Results
Abstract—We analyze the postseismic processes in the region of the Mw 8.2 Chignik earthquake, Alaska, which occurred on July 29, 2021. Using the model of the seismic rupture surface constructed in our previous work (Konvisar et al., 2023), we have modeled the viscoelastic relaxation process. The results indicate that by reducing the viscosity of the asthenosphere to 1018 Pa s we an achieve the displacement velocities that are close to those recorded at the coastal GPS sites. However, the displacements on the islands near the source zone of the earthquake differ significantly not only in magnitude but also in direction. At the same time, the constructed postseismic creep (afterslip) model agrees well with displacement data at the GPS sites and with the line-of-sight (LOS) displacement map derived from radar images taken from the descending orbit of the Sentinel-1A satellite. We also analyze temporal variations of gravity field in the earthquake region. The obtained coseismic anomaly is consistent with the anomaly calculated from the rupture surface model. Isolating the postseismic anomaly it is not yet possible due to the insufficiently long time series of gravity models for the time period after the earthquake. The analysis of the postseismic processes is continued in the second part of this work (Smirnov et al., 2024), where we compare development over time of the postseismic displacements of various GPS sites with the aftershock activity, which allows us to draw conclusions about the creep nature of the postseismic processes in the source region of the Chignik earthquake.
期刊介绍:
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes results of original theoretical and experimental research in relevant areas of the physics of the Earth''s interior and applied geophysics. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.