利用修改后的 SWAT-Terrace 模型评估沟壑土地整理中的水土保持效果

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil & Tillage Research Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.still.2024.106313
Shaobo Long , Jianen Gao , Hui Shao , Lu Wang , Zhe Gao , Minmin Qiang
{"title":"利用修改后的 SWAT-Terrace 模型评估沟壑土地整理中的水土保持效果","authors":"Shaobo Long ,&nbsp;Jianen Gao ,&nbsp;Hui Shao ,&nbsp;Lu Wang ,&nbsp;Zhe Gao ,&nbsp;Minmin Qiang","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2024.106313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To alleviate the competition for cropland between ecological restoration and agricultural production, a Gully Land Consolidation (GLC) project has been widely executed in the Chinese Loess Plateau. This project involves mechanically excavating slopes and filling gullies to expand cropland area. Therefore, in the context of climatic and topographical changes, an assessment of the impact of GLC as a key land use measure of water and sediment in space and time is urgently needed. However, due to scale effects, there is a lack of relevant assessments for the GLC. This study utilized the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and SWAT-Terrace model to analyze the temporal-spatial changes of water and sediment in the Yanhe watershed during 1985–1998 (R1) and 1999–2017 (R2). Additionally, it assessed the effectiveness of GLC in erosion control across different sub-basin clusters. The results showed that (1) at the temporal scale, the runoff and sediment decreased by 30.09 % and 72.73 % respectively, during R2 compared to R1; (2) at the spatial scale, 56 % and 71 % of the sub-basins located in the central and northern parts of the watershed showed a reduction in water and sediment yield, respectively, during R2 compared to R1, while the remaining sub-basins located in the southern part showed an increasing trend in water and sediment yield; and (3) the GLC can reduce 1.17 %-1.93 % of water yield and 0.94 %-1.91 % of sediment yield in the three clusters of sub-basins. The assessment of the soil and water conservation effects of the GLC is beneficial to policymakers in designing effective land management plans and the extension of the project to other regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the effects of soil and water conservation in gully land consolidation using the modified SWAT-Terrace model\",\"authors\":\"Shaobo Long ,&nbsp;Jianen Gao ,&nbsp;Hui Shao ,&nbsp;Lu Wang ,&nbsp;Zhe Gao ,&nbsp;Minmin Qiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2024.106313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To alleviate the competition for cropland between ecological restoration and agricultural production, a Gully Land Consolidation (GLC) project has been widely executed in the Chinese Loess Plateau. This project involves mechanically excavating slopes and filling gullies to expand cropland area. Therefore, in the context of climatic and topographical changes, an assessment of the impact of GLC as a key land use measure of water and sediment in space and time is urgently needed. However, due to scale effects, there is a lack of relevant assessments for the GLC. This study utilized the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and SWAT-Terrace model to analyze the temporal-spatial changes of water and sediment in the Yanhe watershed during 1985–1998 (R1) and 1999–2017 (R2). Additionally, it assessed the effectiveness of GLC in erosion control across different sub-basin clusters. The results showed that (1) at the temporal scale, the runoff and sediment decreased by 30.09 % and 72.73 % respectively, during R2 compared to R1; (2) at the spatial scale, 56 % and 71 % of the sub-basins located in the central and northern parts of the watershed showed a reduction in water and sediment yield, respectively, during R2 compared to R1, while the remaining sub-basins located in the southern part showed an increasing trend in water and sediment yield; and (3) the GLC can reduce 1.17 %-1.93 % of water yield and 0.94 %-1.91 % of sediment yield in the three clusters of sub-basins. The assessment of the soil and water conservation effects of the GLC is beneficial to policymakers in designing effective land management plans and the extension of the project to other regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724003143\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724003143","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为缓解生态恢复与农业生产对耕地的争夺,中国黄土高原广泛实施了沟壑土地整理项目(GLC)。该项目通过机械开挖边坡、填平沟壑来扩大耕地面积。因此,在气候和地形变化的背景下,迫切需要对作为水和沉积物主要土地利用措施的沟壑沉积在空间和时间上的影响进行评估。然而,由于规模效应,目前缺乏对全球陆地观测系统的相关评估。本研究利用水土评估工具(SWAT)和 SWAT-Terrace 模型分析了延河流域 1985-1998 年(R1)和 1999-2017 年(R2)期间水量和泥沙的时空变化。此外,该研究还评估了不同子流域群 GLC 在水土流失控制中的效果。结果表明:(1) 在时间尺度上,与 R1 相比,R2 期间径流量和泥沙量分别减少了 30.09 % 和 72.73 %;(2) 在空间尺度上,与 R1 相比,R2 期间位于流域中部和北部的子流域分别有 56 % 和 71 % 的水量和泥沙量减少,而位于南部的其余子流域的水量和泥沙量则呈上升趋势;(3) GLC 可减少 1.17 %-1.93 %,减少泥沙量 0.94 %-1.91 %。对全球陆地观测站的水土保持效果进行评估,有利于决策者设计有效的土地管理计划和将该项目推广到其他地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the effects of soil and water conservation in gully land consolidation using the modified SWAT-Terrace model
To alleviate the competition for cropland between ecological restoration and agricultural production, a Gully Land Consolidation (GLC) project has been widely executed in the Chinese Loess Plateau. This project involves mechanically excavating slopes and filling gullies to expand cropland area. Therefore, in the context of climatic and topographical changes, an assessment of the impact of GLC as a key land use measure of water and sediment in space and time is urgently needed. However, due to scale effects, there is a lack of relevant assessments for the GLC. This study utilized the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and SWAT-Terrace model to analyze the temporal-spatial changes of water and sediment in the Yanhe watershed during 1985–1998 (R1) and 1999–2017 (R2). Additionally, it assessed the effectiveness of GLC in erosion control across different sub-basin clusters. The results showed that (1) at the temporal scale, the runoff and sediment decreased by 30.09 % and 72.73 % respectively, during R2 compared to R1; (2) at the spatial scale, 56 % and 71 % of the sub-basins located in the central and northern parts of the watershed showed a reduction in water and sediment yield, respectively, during R2 compared to R1, while the remaining sub-basins located in the southern part showed an increasing trend in water and sediment yield; and (3) the GLC can reduce 1.17 %-1.93 % of water yield and 0.94 %-1.91 % of sediment yield in the three clusters of sub-basins. The assessment of the soil and water conservation effects of the GLC is beneficial to policymakers in designing effective land management plans and the extension of the project to other regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
期刊最新文献
Modeling compaction effects on hydraulic properties of soils using limited information Soil surface roughness impacts erosion behavior through selective regulation of flow properties in rainfall-seepage scenarios Network analysis was effective in establishing the soil quality index and differentiated among changes in land-use type Changes in soil mechanical and hydraulic properties through regenerative cultivation measures in long-term and farm experiments in Germany Depth-driven responses of soil organic carbon fractions to orchard cover crops across China: A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1