Robert Jandl , Herbert Hager , Florian Kraxner , Thomas Ledermann , Peter Weiss
{"title":"奥地利可持续管理森林的二氧化碳中和效应","authors":"Robert Jandl , Herbert Hager , Florian Kraxner , Thomas Ledermann , Peter Weiss","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forests contribute to climate change mitigation by retaining carbon in their biomass, providing the renewable resource for wood-based products, bioenergy, and the substitution of materials with a bigger ecological footprint. Whether or not forest management is carbon neutral is a matter of discussion that is compromised by unclear terminology. It is claimed that unmanaged forests hold higher carbon stocks in the biomass and therefore contribute more to the mitigation of climate change. Particularly critical is the appraisal of bioenergy from wood. Based on Austrian data we demonstrate that forest management has been sustainable for at least several decades and that the business-as-usual management with a focus on timber production and bioenergy mainly as side-stream of timber processing does not introduce additional carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) to the atmosphere, but removes it. With annual harvest rates consistently lower than the annual timber increment and a vital timber processing industry the forests and the wood products have been a sink of greenhouse gases that have compensated for on average 14 % of the Austrian greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions between 1990 and 2022. We critically assess concepts that classify forest management operations as non‑carbon-neutral and conclude that the narrative is only valid in regions with unsustainable forest management and deforestation. The storage of carbon in the biomass and in wood products, the generation of bioenergy mainly from a side stream of timber processing, and the substitution of non-wood products represent a consistent sink of carbon dioxide. We also conclude that frequently used baselines of unmanaged forests as comparison to managed forests are based on unfounded assumptions of forest ecosystem dynamics, insufficiently accounting for tree mortality and disturbances. We support the business-as-usual forest management as carbon neutral and recognize the need for active forest management to implement adaptive measures to successfully cope with climate change impacts, and to supply society with a renewable resource of small GHG footprint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107417"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon dioxide neutrality of sustainably managed forests of Austria\",\"authors\":\"Robert Jandl , Herbert Hager , Florian Kraxner , Thomas Ledermann , Peter Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Forests contribute to climate change mitigation by retaining carbon in their biomass, providing the renewable resource for wood-based products, bioenergy, and the substitution of materials with a bigger ecological footprint. Whether or not forest management is carbon neutral is a matter of discussion that is compromised by unclear terminology. It is claimed that unmanaged forests hold higher carbon stocks in the biomass and therefore contribute more to the mitigation of climate change. Particularly critical is the appraisal of bioenergy from wood. Based on Austrian data we demonstrate that forest management has been sustainable for at least several decades and that the business-as-usual management with a focus on timber production and bioenergy mainly as side-stream of timber processing does not introduce additional carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) to the atmosphere, but removes it. With annual harvest rates consistently lower than the annual timber increment and a vital timber processing industry the forests and the wood products have been a sink of greenhouse gases that have compensated for on average 14 % of the Austrian greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions between 1990 and 2022. We critically assess concepts that classify forest management operations as non‑carbon-neutral and conclude that the narrative is only valid in regions with unsustainable forest management and deforestation. The storage of carbon in the biomass and in wood products, the generation of bioenergy mainly from a side stream of timber processing, and the substitution of non-wood products represent a consistent sink of carbon dioxide. We also conclude that frequently used baselines of unmanaged forests as comparison to managed forests are based on unfounded assumptions of forest ecosystem dynamics, insufficiently accounting for tree mortality and disturbances. We support the business-as-usual forest management as carbon neutral and recognize the need for active forest management to implement adaptive measures to successfully cope with climate change impacts, and to supply society with a renewable resource of small GHG footprint.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002428\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Carbon dioxide neutrality of sustainably managed forests of Austria
Forests contribute to climate change mitigation by retaining carbon in their biomass, providing the renewable resource for wood-based products, bioenergy, and the substitution of materials with a bigger ecological footprint. Whether or not forest management is carbon neutral is a matter of discussion that is compromised by unclear terminology. It is claimed that unmanaged forests hold higher carbon stocks in the biomass and therefore contribute more to the mitigation of climate change. Particularly critical is the appraisal of bioenergy from wood. Based on Austrian data we demonstrate that forest management has been sustainable for at least several decades and that the business-as-usual management with a focus on timber production and bioenergy mainly as side-stream of timber processing does not introduce additional carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere, but removes it. With annual harvest rates consistently lower than the annual timber increment and a vital timber processing industry the forests and the wood products have been a sink of greenhouse gases that have compensated for on average 14 % of the Austrian greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions between 1990 and 2022. We critically assess concepts that classify forest management operations as non‑carbon-neutral and conclude that the narrative is only valid in regions with unsustainable forest management and deforestation. The storage of carbon in the biomass and in wood products, the generation of bioenergy mainly from a side stream of timber processing, and the substitution of non-wood products represent a consistent sink of carbon dioxide. We also conclude that frequently used baselines of unmanaged forests as comparison to managed forests are based on unfounded assumptions of forest ecosystem dynamics, insufficiently accounting for tree mortality and disturbances. We support the business-as-usual forest management as carbon neutral and recognize the need for active forest management to implement adaptive measures to successfully cope with climate change impacts, and to supply society with a renewable resource of small GHG footprint.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.