奥地利可持续管理森林的二氧化碳中和效应

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107417
Robert Jandl , Herbert Hager , Florian Kraxner , Thomas Ledermann , Peter Weiss
{"title":"奥地利可持续管理森林的二氧化碳中和效应","authors":"Robert Jandl ,&nbsp;Herbert Hager ,&nbsp;Florian Kraxner ,&nbsp;Thomas Ledermann ,&nbsp;Peter Weiss","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forests contribute to climate change mitigation by retaining carbon in their biomass, providing the renewable resource for wood-based products, bioenergy, and the substitution of materials with a bigger ecological footprint. Whether or not forest management is carbon neutral is a matter of discussion that is compromised by unclear terminology. It is claimed that unmanaged forests hold higher carbon stocks in the biomass and therefore contribute more to the mitigation of climate change. Particularly critical is the appraisal of bioenergy from wood. Based on Austrian data we demonstrate that forest management has been sustainable for at least several decades and that the business-as-usual management with a focus on timber production and bioenergy mainly as side-stream of timber processing does not introduce additional carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) to the atmosphere, but removes it. With annual harvest rates consistently lower than the annual timber increment and a vital timber processing industry the forests and the wood products have been a sink of greenhouse gases that have compensated for on average 14 % of the Austrian greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions between 1990 and 2022. We critically assess concepts that classify forest management operations as non‑carbon-neutral and conclude that the narrative is only valid in regions with unsustainable forest management and deforestation. The storage of carbon in the biomass and in wood products, the generation of bioenergy mainly from a side stream of timber processing, and the substitution of non-wood products represent a consistent sink of carbon dioxide. We also conclude that frequently used baselines of unmanaged forests as comparison to managed forests are based on unfounded assumptions of forest ecosystem dynamics, insufficiently accounting for tree mortality and disturbances. We support the business-as-usual forest management as carbon neutral and recognize the need for active forest management to implement adaptive measures to successfully cope with climate change impacts, and to supply society with a renewable resource of small GHG footprint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 107417"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon dioxide neutrality of sustainably managed forests of Austria\",\"authors\":\"Robert Jandl ,&nbsp;Herbert Hager ,&nbsp;Florian Kraxner ,&nbsp;Thomas Ledermann ,&nbsp;Peter Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Forests contribute to climate change mitigation by retaining carbon in their biomass, providing the renewable resource for wood-based products, bioenergy, and the substitution of materials with a bigger ecological footprint. Whether or not forest management is carbon neutral is a matter of discussion that is compromised by unclear terminology. It is claimed that unmanaged forests hold higher carbon stocks in the biomass and therefore contribute more to the mitigation of climate change. Particularly critical is the appraisal of bioenergy from wood. Based on Austrian data we demonstrate that forest management has been sustainable for at least several decades and that the business-as-usual management with a focus on timber production and bioenergy mainly as side-stream of timber processing does not introduce additional carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) to the atmosphere, but removes it. With annual harvest rates consistently lower than the annual timber increment and a vital timber processing industry the forests and the wood products have been a sink of greenhouse gases that have compensated for on average 14 % of the Austrian greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions between 1990 and 2022. We critically assess concepts that classify forest management operations as non‑carbon-neutral and conclude that the narrative is only valid in regions with unsustainable forest management and deforestation. The storage of carbon in the biomass and in wood products, the generation of bioenergy mainly from a side stream of timber processing, and the substitution of non-wood products represent a consistent sink of carbon dioxide. We also conclude that frequently used baselines of unmanaged forests as comparison to managed forests are based on unfounded assumptions of forest ecosystem dynamics, insufficiently accounting for tree mortality and disturbances. We support the business-as-usual forest management as carbon neutral and recognize the need for active forest management to implement adaptive measures to successfully cope with climate change impacts, and to supply society with a renewable resource of small GHG footprint.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002428\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林通过在其生物质中保留碳,为木质产品、生物能源以及替代生态足迹更大的材料提供可再生资源,从而为减缓气候变化做出贡献。森林管理是否碳中和是一个需要讨论的问题,但由于术语不明确而受到影响。据称,未经管理的森林在生物质中的碳储量更高,因此对减缓气候变化的贡献更大。尤其关键的是对木材生物能源的评估。根据奥地利的数据,我们证明了森林管理至少在几十年前就已经实现了可持续发展,而且以木材生产和主要作为木材加工副产品的生物能源为重点的 "一切照旧 "管理并没有向大气中引入额外的二氧化碳(CO2),而是清除了这些二氧化碳。由于年采伐量一直低于年木材增量,加上木材加工业的重要性,森林和木制品一直是温室气体的吸收汇,在 1990 年至 2022 年期间,平均补偿了奥地利 14% 的温室气体排放量。我们对将森林管理业务归类为非碳中性的概念进行了批判性评估,并得出结论:这种说法只适用于不可持续的森林管理和森林砍伐地区。生物质和木制品中的碳储存、主要由木材加工副产品产生的生物能源以及非木材产品的替代品代表了一种持续的二氧化碳汇。我们还得出结论,经常使用的将非经营性森林与经营性森林进行比较的基线是基于对森林生态系统动态的毫无根据的假设,没有充分考虑到树木的死亡和干扰。我们支持将 "一切照旧 "的森林管理视为碳中和,并认识到有必要进行积极的森林管理,以实施适应措施,成功应对气候变化的影响,并为社会提供温室气体足迹较小的可再生资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Carbon dioxide neutrality of sustainably managed forests of Austria
Forests contribute to climate change mitigation by retaining carbon in their biomass, providing the renewable resource for wood-based products, bioenergy, and the substitution of materials with a bigger ecological footprint. Whether or not forest management is carbon neutral is a matter of discussion that is compromised by unclear terminology. It is claimed that unmanaged forests hold higher carbon stocks in the biomass and therefore contribute more to the mitigation of climate change. Particularly critical is the appraisal of bioenergy from wood. Based on Austrian data we demonstrate that forest management has been sustainable for at least several decades and that the business-as-usual management with a focus on timber production and bioenergy mainly as side-stream of timber processing does not introduce additional carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere, but removes it. With annual harvest rates consistently lower than the annual timber increment and a vital timber processing industry the forests and the wood products have been a sink of greenhouse gases that have compensated for on average 14 % of the Austrian greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions between 1990 and 2022. We critically assess concepts that classify forest management operations as non‑carbon-neutral and conclude that the narrative is only valid in regions with unsustainable forest management and deforestation. The storage of carbon in the biomass and in wood products, the generation of bioenergy mainly from a side stream of timber processing, and the substitution of non-wood products represent a consistent sink of carbon dioxide. We also conclude that frequently used baselines of unmanaged forests as comparison to managed forests are based on unfounded assumptions of forest ecosystem dynamics, insufficiently accounting for tree mortality and disturbances. We support the business-as-usual forest management as carbon neutral and recognize the need for active forest management to implement adaptive measures to successfully cope with climate change impacts, and to supply society with a renewable resource of small GHG footprint.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
Effects of restorative treatments confirmed in a restored pond Living in a material world: Support for the use of natural and alternative materials in coastal restoration and living shorelines Editorial Board Long term performance of Nature-Based Solutions as decentralized wastewater treatment: a case study of a retail store in southern Italy Are floating mangrove breakwaters effective for wave attenuation? - A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1