引入老年矫形科家访前后的再入院率和死亡率:髋部骨折患者的回顾性队列研究

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2024.111937
{"title":"引入老年矫形科家访前后的再入院率和死亡率:髋部骨折患者的回顾性队列研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Orthogeriatric collaboration in hip fracture patients during admission is well established, however, orthogeriatric involvement after discharge is not common. The aim of this study was to explore the association of orthogeriatric home visits with 30-day and 120-day readmission and mortality in ≥ 65-year-old patients surgically treated for hip fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A cohort of patients who underwent acute hip fracture surgery in an usual care period from January 2018 to December 2018 was compared with a cohort of patients in an intervention period from June 2020 to June 2021. During the intervention period, patients were offered orthogeriatric home visits at day 2 and 9 after discharge. The home visits were performed by orthogeriatric nurses, in close collaboration with geriatricians and orthopedic surgeons based in the local hospital. Readmission was defined as ≥ 12 h hospital stay, regardless of reason. For the main analysis, we applied Cox-regression models adjusted for age, sex, New Mobility Score, Cumulated Ambulation Score regained, cognitive function, Charlson Comorbidity Index, complications, medication, discharge destination and emergency department visits.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 292 patients were included during the usual care period, and 308 patients during the intervention period. Thirty- and 120-day readmission rates were 27.7 % and 41.4 % in the usual care cohort vs. 21.8 % and 35.1 % in the home visit cohort. Adjusted Hazard Ratios for readmission in the intervention cohort after 30 and 120 days were 0.67 (CI95 %: 0.48–0.93) and 0.71 (CI95 %: 0.54–0.93) respectively. Thirty- and 120-day mortality rates were 7.2 % and 20.9 % in the usual care cohort versus 5.8 % and 13.3 % in the intervention cohort. Adjusted Hazard Ratios for mortality in the intervention cohort after 30 and 120 days were 0.68 (CI95 %: 0.35–1.31) and 0.56 (CI95 %: 0.37–0.84) respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In a period where hip fracture patients were offered two home visits after discharge, we observed lower 30- and 120- day readmission, and lower 120-day mortality, calling for more studies with a randomized design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Readmission and mortality before and after introduction of orthogeriatric home visits: A retrospective cohort study in hip fracture patients\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Orthogeriatric collaboration in hip fracture patients during admission is well established, however, orthogeriatric involvement after discharge is not common. The aim of this study was to explore the association of orthogeriatric home visits with 30-day and 120-day readmission and mortality in ≥ 65-year-old patients surgically treated for hip fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A cohort of patients who underwent acute hip fracture surgery in an usual care period from January 2018 to December 2018 was compared with a cohort of patients in an intervention period from June 2020 to June 2021. During the intervention period, patients were offered orthogeriatric home visits at day 2 and 9 after discharge. The home visits were performed by orthogeriatric nurses, in close collaboration with geriatricians and orthopedic surgeons based in the local hospital. Readmission was defined as ≥ 12 h hospital stay, regardless of reason. For the main analysis, we applied Cox-regression models adjusted for age, sex, New Mobility Score, Cumulated Ambulation Score regained, cognitive function, Charlson Comorbidity Index, complications, medication, discharge destination and emergency department visits.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 292 patients were included during the usual care period, and 308 patients during the intervention period. Thirty- and 120-day readmission rates were 27.7 % and 41.4 % in the usual care cohort vs. 21.8 % and 35.1 % in the home visit cohort. Adjusted Hazard Ratios for readmission in the intervention cohort after 30 and 120 days were 0.67 (CI95 %: 0.48–0.93) and 0.71 (CI95 %: 0.54–0.93) respectively. Thirty- and 120-day mortality rates were 7.2 % and 20.9 % in the usual care cohort versus 5.8 % and 13.3 % in the intervention cohort. Adjusted Hazard Ratios for mortality in the intervention cohort after 30 and 120 days were 0.68 (CI95 %: 0.35–1.31) and 0.56 (CI95 %: 0.37–0.84) respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In a period where hip fracture patients were offered two home visits after discharge, we observed lower 30- and 120- day readmission, and lower 120-day mortality, calling for more studies with a randomized design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324006661\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324006661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:髋部骨折患者入院时的老年骨科合作已得到广泛认可,但出院后老年骨科的参与并不常见。本研究旨在探讨髋部骨折手术治疗的≥65岁患者中,老年骨科家访与30天和120天再入院率和死亡率的关系。材料和方法将2018年1月至2018年12月常规护理期间接受急性髋部骨折手术的患者队列与2020年6月至2021年6月干预期间的患者队列进行比较。在干预期间,患者可在出院后第 2 天和第 9 天接受骨科家访。家访由骨科护士与当地医院的老年病学专家和骨科医生密切合作进行。无论原因如何,住院时间≥ 12 小时即为再次入院。在主要分析中,我们采用了Cox回归模型,并对年龄、性别、新活动能力评分、累积恢复活动能力评分、认知功能、Charlson合并症指数、并发症、用药、出院目的地和急诊就诊等因素进行了调整。常规护理组的 30 天和 120 天再入院率分别为 27.7% 和 41.4%,而家访组分别为 21.8% 和 35.1%。干预队列 30 天和 120 天后再入院的调整危险比分别为 0.67(CI95 %:0.48-0.93)和 0.71(CI95 %:0.54-0.93)。常规护理队列的 30 天和 120 天死亡率分别为 7.2% 和 20.9%,而干预队列的死亡率分别为 5.8% 和 13.3%。结论 在为髋部骨折患者提供出院后两次家访的期间,我们观察到 30 天和 120 天再入院率较低,120 天死亡率较低,因此需要进行更多随机设计的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Readmission and mortality before and after introduction of orthogeriatric home visits: A retrospective cohort study in hip fracture patients

Introduction

Orthogeriatric collaboration in hip fracture patients during admission is well established, however, orthogeriatric involvement after discharge is not common. The aim of this study was to explore the association of orthogeriatric home visits with 30-day and 120-day readmission and mortality in ≥ 65-year-old patients surgically treated for hip fractures.

Materials and Methods

A cohort of patients who underwent acute hip fracture surgery in an usual care period from January 2018 to December 2018 was compared with a cohort of patients in an intervention period from June 2020 to June 2021. During the intervention period, patients were offered orthogeriatric home visits at day 2 and 9 after discharge. The home visits were performed by orthogeriatric nurses, in close collaboration with geriatricians and orthopedic surgeons based in the local hospital. Readmission was defined as ≥ 12 h hospital stay, regardless of reason. For the main analysis, we applied Cox-regression models adjusted for age, sex, New Mobility Score, Cumulated Ambulation Score regained, cognitive function, Charlson Comorbidity Index, complications, medication, discharge destination and emergency department visits.

Results

In total, 292 patients were included during the usual care period, and 308 patients during the intervention period. Thirty- and 120-day readmission rates were 27.7 % and 41.4 % in the usual care cohort vs. 21.8 % and 35.1 % in the home visit cohort. Adjusted Hazard Ratios for readmission in the intervention cohort after 30 and 120 days were 0.67 (CI95 %: 0.48–0.93) and 0.71 (CI95 %: 0.54–0.93) respectively. Thirty- and 120-day mortality rates were 7.2 % and 20.9 % in the usual care cohort versus 5.8 % and 13.3 % in the intervention cohort. Adjusted Hazard Ratios for mortality in the intervention cohort after 30 and 120 days were 0.68 (CI95 %: 0.35–1.31) and 0.56 (CI95 %: 0.37–0.84) respectively.

Conclusions

In a period where hip fracture patients were offered two home visits after discharge, we observed lower 30- and 120- day readmission, and lower 120-day mortality, calling for more studies with a randomized design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Fracture-related infection blood-based biomarkers: Diagnostic strategies The value of current diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of fracture-related infections: Serum markers, histology, and cultures Antimicrobial resistance: Biofilms, small colony variants, and intracellular bacteria In vivo models of infection: Large animals – Mini review on human-scale one-stage revision in a porcine osteomyelitis model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1