通过拖欠估算违约概率?欧洲 P2P 借贷市场的证据

IF 5.5 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Global Finance Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.gfj.2024.101050
Asror Nigmonov , Syed Shams , Povilas Urbonas
{"title":"通过拖欠估算违约概率?欧洲 P2P 借贷市场的证据","authors":"Asror Nigmonov ,&nbsp;Syed Shams ,&nbsp;Povilas Urbonas","doi":"10.1016/j.gfj.2024.101050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The unprecedented growth of the financial sector's digital transformation opens wide areas to the scaling up of finance in innovative and knowledge-based projects. Improving risk management takes centre stage in the acceleration of this process. This study uses loan-book data from the peer-to-peer (P2P) lending market to empirically investigate the determinants of default risk. Using the loan-book database covering the period from 2014 to 2020, we examine multiple factors related to the default risk of loans issued by P2P lending platforms. The results indicate that a higher interest rate and higher stock market returns increase the probability of default in the P2P lending market. Results are robust to additional tests based on endogeneity correction, the LASSO method and sampling bias. The severity of the impact of market returns and interest rates is found to be significantly different based on the levels of financial technology (FinTech) adoption and banking sector distress. Increases in the market interest rate are found to boost the sensitivity of P2P loan defaults to stock market volatility. This study contributes to existing literature on risk management models with its consideration of country-specific factors, paving the way to future best practices in the market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46907,"journal":{"name":"Global Finance Journal","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 101050"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating probability of default via delinquencies? Evidence from European P2P lending market\",\"authors\":\"Asror Nigmonov ,&nbsp;Syed Shams ,&nbsp;Povilas Urbonas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gfj.2024.101050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The unprecedented growth of the financial sector's digital transformation opens wide areas to the scaling up of finance in innovative and knowledge-based projects. Improving risk management takes centre stage in the acceleration of this process. This study uses loan-book data from the peer-to-peer (P2P) lending market to empirically investigate the determinants of default risk. Using the loan-book database covering the period from 2014 to 2020, we examine multiple factors related to the default risk of loans issued by P2P lending platforms. The results indicate that a higher interest rate and higher stock market returns increase the probability of default in the P2P lending market. Results are robust to additional tests based on endogeneity correction, the LASSO method and sampling bias. The severity of the impact of market returns and interest rates is found to be significantly different based on the levels of financial technology (FinTech) adoption and banking sector distress. Increases in the market interest rate are found to boost the sensitivity of P2P loan defaults to stock market volatility. This study contributes to existing literature on risk management models with its consideration of country-specific factors, paving the way to future best practices in the market.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101050\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028324001224\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028324001224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

金融业数字化转型的空前发展为扩大创新和知识型项目的融资规模开辟了广阔的空间。在加速这一进程的过程中,改进风险管理占据了中心位置。本研究利用点对点(P2P)借贷市场的贷款账簿数据,对违约风险的决定因素进行了实证研究。利用覆盖 2014 年至 2020 年的贷款账簿数据库,我们研究了与 P2P 网络借贷平台发放贷款的违约风险有关的多种因素。结果表明,较高的利率和较高的股市回报会增加 P2P 网络借贷市场的违约概率。基于内生性校正、LASSO 方法和抽样偏差的附加检验结果是稳健的。根据金融科技(FinTech)的采用水平和银行业的困境,市场回报率和利率影响的严重程度存在显著差异。研究发现,市场利率的上升会提高 P2P 贷款违约对股市波动的敏感性。本研究考虑了特定国家的因素,为现有的风险管理模型文献做出了贡献,为未来市场的最佳实践铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating probability of default via delinquencies? Evidence from European P2P lending market
The unprecedented growth of the financial sector's digital transformation opens wide areas to the scaling up of finance in innovative and knowledge-based projects. Improving risk management takes centre stage in the acceleration of this process. This study uses loan-book data from the peer-to-peer (P2P) lending market to empirically investigate the determinants of default risk. Using the loan-book database covering the period from 2014 to 2020, we examine multiple factors related to the default risk of loans issued by P2P lending platforms. The results indicate that a higher interest rate and higher stock market returns increase the probability of default in the P2P lending market. Results are robust to additional tests based on endogeneity correction, the LASSO method and sampling bias. The severity of the impact of market returns and interest rates is found to be significantly different based on the levels of financial technology (FinTech) adoption and banking sector distress. Increases in the market interest rate are found to boost the sensitivity of P2P loan defaults to stock market volatility. This study contributes to existing literature on risk management models with its consideration of country-specific factors, paving the way to future best practices in the market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Finance Journal
Global Finance Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.50%
发文量
106
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Global Finance Journal provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and techniques among academicians and practitioners and, thereby, advances applied research in global financial management. Global Finance Journal publishes original, creative, scholarly research that integrates theory and practice and addresses a readership in both business and academia. Articles reflecting pragmatic research are sought in areas such as financial management, investment, banking and financial services, accounting, and taxation. Global Finance Journal welcomes contributions from scholars in both the business and academic community and encourages collaborative research from this broad base worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Business group heterogeneity and firm outcomes: Evidence from Korean chaebols Under the microscope: Trade initiation activities around earnings and takeover announcements in a market with continuous disclosure Stock, foreign exchange and commodity markets linkages: Implications for risk diversification and portfolio management Value of climate change news: A textual analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1