不同玉米秸秆驱动生物精炼厂生产生物氢、生物乙醇和生物甲烷的开发、动力学分析和经济可行性:比较分析

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable Energy Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2024.121625
{"title":"不同玉米秸秆驱动生物精炼厂生产生物氢、生物乙醇和生物甲烷的开发、动力学分析和经济可行性:比较分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The purpose of the article is to design, evaluate, and compare four different pathways implemented in the Corn Stover-driven biorefineries. These pathways are based on biohydrogen production via Photo-fermentation (PFBHP) or dark fermentation (DFBHP), biomethane production (BMP), and bioethanol production (BEP). A comprehensive examination and analysis of the mentioned pathways in terms of the kinetic properties, greenhouse gas emissions, and economic feasibility was developed. The research problem addressed is the lack of a comprehensive, comparative analysis of these pathways under consistent conditions, limiting informed decision-making for large-scale biorefinery implementation. The maximum outputs of the PFBHP, DFBHP, BMP, and BEP pathways were around 68.5 mL per gram DM (dry matter) at 25 g DM per Liter, 48.0 mL per gram DM at 25 g DM per Liter, 0.19 L per gram DM at 4 % TS, and 0.05 g per gram DM at 55 g DM per Liter. Additionally, the BMP pathway achieved the maximum energy output, peaking at around 7.02 kJ/g DM under 4 % TS. Further, the PFBHP pathway emerged as high-economic value method, with the peak economic value being 0.20 US$ per kg DM. The PFBHP and DFBHP methods were environmentally favorable, emitting no greenhouse gases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development, kinetic analysis, and economic feasibility of different Corn Stover-driven biorefineries to produce biohydrogen, bioethanol, and biomethane: A comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The purpose of the article is to design, evaluate, and compare four different pathways implemented in the Corn Stover-driven biorefineries. These pathways are based on biohydrogen production via Photo-fermentation (PFBHP) or dark fermentation (DFBHP), biomethane production (BMP), and bioethanol production (BEP). A comprehensive examination and analysis of the mentioned pathways in terms of the kinetic properties, greenhouse gas emissions, and economic feasibility was developed. The research problem addressed is the lack of a comprehensive, comparative analysis of these pathways under consistent conditions, limiting informed decision-making for large-scale biorefinery implementation. The maximum outputs of the PFBHP, DFBHP, BMP, and BEP pathways were around 68.5 mL per gram DM (dry matter) at 25 g DM per Liter, 48.0 mL per gram DM at 25 g DM per Liter, 0.19 L per gram DM at 4 % TS, and 0.05 g per gram DM at 55 g DM per Liter. Additionally, the BMP pathway achieved the maximum energy output, peaking at around 7.02 kJ/g DM under 4 % TS. Further, the PFBHP pathway emerged as high-economic value method, with the peak economic value being 0.20 US$ per kg DM. The PFBHP and DFBHP methods were environmentally favorable, emitting no greenhouse gases.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124016938\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124016938","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在设计、评估和比较在玉米秸秆驱动的生物炼油厂中实施的四种不同途径。这些途径基于通过光发酵(PFBHP)或暗发酵(DFBHP)生产生物氢、生产生物甲烷(BMP)和生产生物乙醇(BEP)。从动力学特性、温室气体排放和经济可行性等方面对上述途径进行了全面研究和分析。所解决的研究问题是缺乏在一致条件下对这些途径进行全面的比较分析,从而限制了在实施大规模生物炼制过程中做出明智的决策。在每升 25 克 DM 的条件下,PFBHP、DFBHP、BMP 和 BEP 途径的最大产出分别约为每克 DM(干物质)68.5 毫升、每克 DM 48.0 毫升(每升 25 克 DM)、每克 DM 0.19 升(4% TS)和每克 DM 0.05 克(每升 55 克 DM)。此外,在 4% TS 条件下,BMP 途径的能量输出最高,达到约 7.02 kJ/g DM。此外,PFBHP 途径是经济价值较高的方法,最高经济价值为每千克 DM 0.20 美元。PFBHP 和 DFBHP 方法对环境有利,不排放温室气体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development, kinetic analysis, and economic feasibility of different Corn Stover-driven biorefineries to produce biohydrogen, bioethanol, and biomethane: A comparative analysis
The purpose of the article is to design, evaluate, and compare four different pathways implemented in the Corn Stover-driven biorefineries. These pathways are based on biohydrogen production via Photo-fermentation (PFBHP) or dark fermentation (DFBHP), biomethane production (BMP), and bioethanol production (BEP). A comprehensive examination and analysis of the mentioned pathways in terms of the kinetic properties, greenhouse gas emissions, and economic feasibility was developed. The research problem addressed is the lack of a comprehensive, comparative analysis of these pathways under consistent conditions, limiting informed decision-making for large-scale biorefinery implementation. The maximum outputs of the PFBHP, DFBHP, BMP, and BEP pathways were around 68.5 mL per gram DM (dry matter) at 25 g DM per Liter, 48.0 mL per gram DM at 25 g DM per Liter, 0.19 L per gram DM at 4 % TS, and 0.05 g per gram DM at 55 g DM per Liter. Additionally, the BMP pathway achieved the maximum energy output, peaking at around 7.02 kJ/g DM under 4 % TS. Further, the PFBHP pathway emerged as high-economic value method, with the peak economic value being 0.20 US$ per kg DM. The PFBHP and DFBHP methods were environmentally favorable, emitting no greenhouse gases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
期刊最新文献
Optimization of slot parameters for performance enhancement of slotted Savonius hydrokinetic turbine using Taguchi analysis Torrefied and pyrolyzed pellets and their environmental impact in household heating Underpinnings of reservoir and techno-economic analysis for Himalayan and Son-Narmada-Tapti geothermal sites of India Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of maleic anhydride hydrogenation to 1,4-butanediol through biomass gasification coupling with chemical looping hydrogen production Development, kinetic analysis, and economic feasibility of different Corn Stover-driven biorefineries to produce biohydrogen, bioethanol, and biomethane: A comparative analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1