欧洲地巢鸟类的减少:除了栖息地,我们还需要管理捕食吗?

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03213
Barry J. McMahon , Susan Doyle , Francois Mougeot , Beatriz Arroyo
{"title":"欧洲地巢鸟类的减少:除了栖息地,我们还需要管理捕食吗?","authors":"Barry J. McMahon ,&nbsp;Susan Doyle ,&nbsp;Francois Mougeot ,&nbsp;Beatriz Arroyo","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bird populations are declining globally with losses recorded in many European breeding birds. Habitat management measures have not resulted in widespread reversal of these declines. We analysed national bird population trends from ten European countries (France, Hungary, Ireland, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK) for which data on individual bird species was freely available online in relation to the species’ nesting strategy (‘ground-nesting’ or ‘other’), Annex I designation (‘designated’ or ‘not designated’) and association with agricultural habitats for breeding (‘associated’ or ‘not associated’). For each country in our dataset, we also broadly categorised the following factors: farming intensity; predator community complexity; and predator control effort. Our results showed additive effects of nesting strategy, designation, and breeding habitats on the likelihood of population decline. Ground-nesting birds were 86 % more likely to decline than birds with other nesting strategies. Annex I designated species of the Birds Directive were 50 % less likely to decline than non-designated birds. Birds breeding primarily in agricultural habitat were more likely to decline than birds breeding in other habitats, interactively with farming intensity. Homogenous trends across Europe (i.e. trends in two or more countries that were either not declining in all countries or declining in all countries), indicate that the probability of population decline was related to nesting strategy and breeding habitat. Ground-nesting birds were 15.6 times more likely than other birds to have a declining trend across Europe, and birds nesting in agricultural habitats were 17.8 times more likely to decline than birds nesting in other habitats. Our results highlight a widespread challenge, therefore widespread instruments (e.g. legislation, economic policies, agri-environment schemes) will be required to reverse these declines. Ground-nesting species requirements can be complex and multiple strategies will be needed to restore populations including the development of predation management tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The decline of ground nesting birds in Europe: Do we need to manage predation in addition to habitat?\",\"authors\":\"Barry J. McMahon ,&nbsp;Susan Doyle ,&nbsp;Francois Mougeot ,&nbsp;Beatriz Arroyo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Bird populations are declining globally with losses recorded in many European breeding birds. Habitat management measures have not resulted in widespread reversal of these declines. We analysed national bird population trends from ten European countries (France, Hungary, Ireland, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK) for which data on individual bird species was freely available online in relation to the species’ nesting strategy (‘ground-nesting’ or ‘other’), Annex I designation (‘designated’ or ‘not designated’) and association with agricultural habitats for breeding (‘associated’ or ‘not associated’). For each country in our dataset, we also broadly categorised the following factors: farming intensity; predator community complexity; and predator control effort. Our results showed additive effects of nesting strategy, designation, and breeding habitats on the likelihood of population decline. Ground-nesting birds were 86 % more likely to decline than birds with other nesting strategies. Annex I designated species of the Birds Directive were 50 % less likely to decline than non-designated birds. Birds breeding primarily in agricultural habitat were more likely to decline than birds breeding in other habitats, interactively with farming intensity. Homogenous trends across Europe (i.e. trends in two or more countries that were either not declining in all countries or declining in all countries), indicate that the probability of population decline was related to nesting strategy and breeding habitat. Ground-nesting birds were 15.6 times more likely than other birds to have a declining trend across Europe, and birds nesting in agricultural habitats were 17.8 times more likely to decline than birds nesting in other habitats. Our results highlight a widespread challenge, therefore widespread instruments (e.g. legislation, economic policies, agri-environment schemes) will be required to reverse these declines. Ground-nesting species requirements can be complex and multiple strategies will be needed to restore populations including the development of predation management tools.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989424004177\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989424004177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球鸟类数量正在下降,许多欧洲繁殖鸟类的数量也在减少。栖息地管理措施并未普遍扭转鸟类数量下降的趋势。我们分析了十个欧洲国家(法国、匈牙利、爱尔兰、荷兰、波兰、葡萄牙、西班牙、瑞典、瑞士和英国)的鸟类种群趋势,这些国家的单个鸟类物种数据可在网上免费获取,数据涉及物种的筑巢策略("地面筑巢 "或 "其他")、附件 I 指定("指定 "或 "未指定")以及与农业栖息地的繁殖关系("相关 "或 "不相关")。对于数据集中的每个国家,我们还对以下因素进行了大致分类:耕作强度、捕食者群落复杂性和捕食者控制力度。我们的研究结果表明,筑巢策略、指定和繁殖栖息地对种群数量下降的可能性具有叠加效应。与采用其他筑巢策略的鸟类相比,采用地面筑巢的鸟类数量下降的可能性要高出86%。鸟类指令》附件一指定物种的数量下降可能性比非指定鸟类低 50%。主要在农业栖息地繁殖的鸟类比在其他栖息地繁殖的鸟类更有可能减少,这与耕作强度相互影响。欧洲的同质化趋势(即两个或两个以上国家的趋势要么在所有国家都没有下降,要么在所有国家都在下降)表明,种群数量下降的可能性与筑巢策略和繁殖生境有关。在整个欧洲,地栖鸟类数量下降的可能性是其他鸟类的15.6倍,在农业栖息地筑巢的鸟类数量下降的可能性是在其他栖息地筑巢的鸟类的17.8倍。我们的研究结果凸显了一个普遍的挑战,因此需要广泛的手段(如立法、经济政策、农业环境计划)来扭转这些下降趋势。地筑巢物种的要求可能很复杂,需要采取多种策略来恢复种群数量,包括开发捕食管理工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The decline of ground nesting birds in Europe: Do we need to manage predation in addition to habitat?
Bird populations are declining globally with losses recorded in many European breeding birds. Habitat management measures have not resulted in widespread reversal of these declines. We analysed national bird population trends from ten European countries (France, Hungary, Ireland, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK) for which data on individual bird species was freely available online in relation to the species’ nesting strategy (‘ground-nesting’ or ‘other’), Annex I designation (‘designated’ or ‘not designated’) and association with agricultural habitats for breeding (‘associated’ or ‘not associated’). For each country in our dataset, we also broadly categorised the following factors: farming intensity; predator community complexity; and predator control effort. Our results showed additive effects of nesting strategy, designation, and breeding habitats on the likelihood of population decline. Ground-nesting birds were 86 % more likely to decline than birds with other nesting strategies. Annex I designated species of the Birds Directive were 50 % less likely to decline than non-designated birds. Birds breeding primarily in agricultural habitat were more likely to decline than birds breeding in other habitats, interactively with farming intensity. Homogenous trends across Europe (i.e. trends in two or more countries that were either not declining in all countries or declining in all countries), indicate that the probability of population decline was related to nesting strategy and breeding habitat. Ground-nesting birds were 15.6 times more likely than other birds to have a declining trend across Europe, and birds nesting in agricultural habitats were 17.8 times more likely to decline than birds nesting in other habitats. Our results highlight a widespread challenge, therefore widespread instruments (e.g. legislation, economic policies, agri-environment schemes) will be required to reverse these declines. Ground-nesting species requirements can be complex and multiple strategies will be needed to restore populations including the development of predation management tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1