EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), Maged Younes, Gabriele Aquilina, Laurence Castle, Gisela Degen, Karl-Heinz Engel, Paul Fowler, Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez, Peter Fürst, Rainer Gürtler, Trine Husøy, Melania Manco, Wim Mennes, Peter Moldeus, Sabina Passamonti, Romina Shah, Ine Waalkens-Berendsen, Matthew Wright, Cristina Andreoli, Maria Bastos, Diane Benford, Margherita Bignami, Claudia Bolognesi, Karlien Cheyns, Emanuela Corsini, Riccardo Crebelli, Birgit Dusemund, Rex Fitzgerald, Eric Gaffet, Katrin Loeschner, Francesca Marcon, Jan Mast, Manuela Mirat, Alicja Mortensen, Agnes Oomen, Josef Schlatter, Dominique Turck, Beate Ulbrich, Anna Undas, Christiane Vleminckx, Detlef Woelfle, Ruud Woutersen, Stefania Barmaz, Borana Dino, Gabriele Gagliardi, Sara Levorato, Elena Mazzoli, Alexis Nathanail, Ana Maria Rincon, Laura Ruggeri, Camilla Smeraldi, Alexandra Tard, Sam Vermeiren, Ursula Gundert-Remy
{"title":"对二氧化硅(E 551)作为食品添加剂用于 16 周岁以下婴儿食品的重新评估,以及对其作为食品添加剂用于所有人群食品的重新评估的后续工作","authors":"EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), Maged Younes, Gabriele Aquilina, Laurence Castle, Gisela Degen, Karl-Heinz Engel, Paul Fowler, Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez, Peter Fürst, Rainer Gürtler, Trine Husøy, Melania Manco, Wim Mennes, Peter Moldeus, Sabina Passamonti, Romina Shah, Ine Waalkens-Berendsen, Matthew Wright, Cristina Andreoli, Maria Bastos, Diane Benford, Margherita Bignami, Claudia Bolognesi, Karlien Cheyns, Emanuela Corsini, Riccardo Crebelli, Birgit Dusemund, Rex Fitzgerald, Eric Gaffet, Katrin Loeschner, Francesca Marcon, Jan Mast, Manuela Mirat, Alicja Mortensen, Agnes Oomen, Josef Schlatter, Dominique Turck, Beate Ulbrich, Anna Undas, Christiane Vleminckx, Detlef Woelfle, Ruud Woutersen, Stefania Barmaz, Borana Dino, Gabriele Gagliardi, Sara Levorato, Elena Mazzoli, Alexis Nathanail, Ana Maria Rincon, Laura Ruggeri, Camilla Smeraldi, Alexandra Tard, Sam Vermeiren, Ursula Gundert-Remy","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present opinion is the follow-up of the conclusions and recommendations of the Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive relevant to the safety assessment for all age groups. In addition, the risk assessment of silicon dioxide (E 551) for its use in food for infants below 16 weeks of age is performed. Based on the newly available information on the characterisation of the SAS used as E 551 and following the principles of the 2021 EFSA Guidance on Particle-TR, the conventional safety assessment has been complemented with nano-specific considerations. Given the uncertainties resulting from the limitations of the database and in the absence of genotoxicity concern, the Panel considered that it is not appropriate to derive an acceptable daily intake (ADI) but applied the margin of exposure (MOE) approach for the risk assessment. The Panel concluded that the MOE should be at least 36 for not raising a safety concern. The calculated MOEs considering the dietary exposure estimates for all population groups using the refined non-brand loyal scenario, estimated at the time of the 2018 re-evaluation, were all above 36. The Panel concluded that E 551 does not raise a safety concern in all population groups at the reported uses and use levels. The use of E 551 in food for infants below 16 weeks of age in FC 13.1.1 and FC 13.1.5.1 does not raise a safety concern at the current exposure levels. The Panel also concluded that the technical data provided support an amendment of the specifications for E 551 laid down in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012. The paucity of toxicological studies with proper dispersion protocol (with the exception of the genotoxicity studies) creates uncertainty in the present assessment of the potential toxicological effects related to the exposure to E 551 nanosize aggregates.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8880","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow-up of its re-evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups\",\"authors\":\"EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), Maged Younes, Gabriele Aquilina, Laurence Castle, Gisela Degen, Karl-Heinz Engel, Paul Fowler, Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez, Peter Fürst, Rainer Gürtler, Trine Husøy, Melania Manco, Wim Mennes, Peter Moldeus, Sabina Passamonti, Romina Shah, Ine Waalkens-Berendsen, Matthew Wright, Cristina Andreoli, Maria Bastos, Diane Benford, Margherita Bignami, Claudia Bolognesi, Karlien Cheyns, Emanuela Corsini, Riccardo Crebelli, Birgit Dusemund, Rex Fitzgerald, Eric Gaffet, Katrin Loeschner, Francesca Marcon, Jan Mast, Manuela Mirat, Alicja Mortensen, Agnes Oomen, Josef Schlatter, Dominique Turck, Beate Ulbrich, Anna Undas, Christiane Vleminckx, Detlef Woelfle, Ruud Woutersen, Stefania Barmaz, Borana Dino, Gabriele Gagliardi, Sara Levorato, Elena Mazzoli, Alexis Nathanail, Ana Maria Rincon, Laura Ruggeri, Camilla Smeraldi, Alexandra Tard, Sam Vermeiren, Ursula Gundert-Remy\",\"doi\":\"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The present opinion is the follow-up of the conclusions and recommendations of the Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive relevant to the safety assessment for all age groups. In addition, the risk assessment of silicon dioxide (E 551) for its use in food for infants below 16 weeks of age is performed. Based on the newly available information on the characterisation of the SAS used as E 551 and following the principles of the 2021 EFSA Guidance on Particle-TR, the conventional safety assessment has been complemented with nano-specific considerations. Given the uncertainties resulting from the limitations of the database and in the absence of genotoxicity concern, the Panel considered that it is not appropriate to derive an acceptable daily intake (ADI) but applied the margin of exposure (MOE) approach for the risk assessment. The Panel concluded that the MOE should be at least 36 for not raising a safety concern. The calculated MOEs considering the dietary exposure estimates for all population groups using the refined non-brand loyal scenario, estimated at the time of the 2018 re-evaluation, were all above 36. The Panel concluded that E 551 does not raise a safety concern in all population groups at the reported uses and use levels. The use of E 551 in food for infants below 16 weeks of age in FC 13.1.1 and FC 13.1.5.1 does not raise a safety concern at the current exposure levels. The Panel also concluded that the technical data provided support an amendment of the specifications for E 551 laid down in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012. The paucity of toxicological studies with proper dispersion protocol (with the exception of the genotoxicity studies) creates uncertainty in the present assessment of the potential toxicological effects related to the exposure to E 551 nanosize aggregates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8880\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8880\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8880","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本意见是关于重新评估二氧化硅(E 551)作为食品添加剂的科学意见中有关各年龄组安全性评估的结论和建议的后续行动。此外,还对二氧化硅(E 551)在 16 周以下婴儿食品中的使用进行了风险评估。根据有关用作 E 551 的 SAS 特性的最新可用信息,并遵循 2021 年欧洲食品安全局《微粒-TR 指南》的原则,对传统安全评估进行了补充,并考虑了纳米特性。考虑到数据库的局限性所带来的不确定性,以及在不存在遗传毒性问题的情况下,专家小组认为不宜得出每日允许摄入量(ADI),而是采用暴露限值(MOE)方法进行风险评估。专家小组的结论是,为了不引起安全问题,暴露限值至少应为 36。在2018年重新评估时,考虑到使用精制非品牌忠诚度情景下所有人群的膳食暴露估计值,计算得出的暴露限值均高于36。专家小组得出结论认为,在报告的用途和使用水平下,E 551不会引起所有人群的安全关切。在FC 13.1.1和FC 13.1.5.1中,E 551用于16周以下婴儿的食品,在当前暴露水平下不会引起安全问题。专家小组还得出结论认为,所提供的技术数据支持对委员会条例(欧盟)第 231/2012 号中规定的 E 551 规格进行修订。采用适当分散规程进行的毒理学研究很少(遗传毒性研究除外),这为目前评估与暴露于E 551纳米聚合体有关的潜在毒理学影响带来了不确定性。
Re-evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow-up of its re-evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups
The present opinion is the follow-up of the conclusions and recommendations of the Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive relevant to the safety assessment for all age groups. In addition, the risk assessment of silicon dioxide (E 551) for its use in food for infants below 16 weeks of age is performed. Based on the newly available information on the characterisation of the SAS used as E 551 and following the principles of the 2021 EFSA Guidance on Particle-TR, the conventional safety assessment has been complemented with nano-specific considerations. Given the uncertainties resulting from the limitations of the database and in the absence of genotoxicity concern, the Panel considered that it is not appropriate to derive an acceptable daily intake (ADI) but applied the margin of exposure (MOE) approach for the risk assessment. The Panel concluded that the MOE should be at least 36 for not raising a safety concern. The calculated MOEs considering the dietary exposure estimates for all population groups using the refined non-brand loyal scenario, estimated at the time of the 2018 re-evaluation, were all above 36. The Panel concluded that E 551 does not raise a safety concern in all population groups at the reported uses and use levels. The use of E 551 in food for infants below 16 weeks of age in FC 13.1.1 and FC 13.1.5.1 does not raise a safety concern at the current exposure levels. The Panel also concluded that the technical data provided support an amendment of the specifications for E 551 laid down in Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012. The paucity of toxicological studies with proper dispersion protocol (with the exception of the genotoxicity studies) creates uncertainty in the present assessment of the potential toxicological effects related to the exposure to E 551 nanosize aggregates.
期刊介绍:
The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.