Youngshin Keum,Maria Luiza Caramori,David Z Cherney,Jill P Crandall,Ian H de Boer,Ildiko Lingvay,Janet B McGill,Sarit Polsky,Rodica Pop-Busui,Peter Rossing,Ronald J Sigal,Michael Mauer,Alessandro Doria
{"title":"将白蛋白尿和肾功能快速下降作为 1 型糖尿病肾脏临床试验的选择标准。","authors":"Youngshin Keum,Maria Luiza Caramori,David Z Cherney,Jill P Crandall,Ian H de Boer,Ildiko Lingvay,Janet B McGill,Sarit Polsky,Rodica Pop-Busui,Peter Rossing,Ronald J Sigal,Michael Mauer,Alessandro Doria","doi":"10.2215/cjn.0000000000000567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe optimal criteria to select individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) and albuminuric or normoalbuminuric diabetic kidney disease (DKD), who are at risk of rapid kidney function decline, for clinical trials are unclear.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis study analyzed data from the Preventing Early Renal Loss in Diabetes (PERL) clinical trial, which investigated whether allopurinol slowed kidney function decline in persons with T1D and early-to-moderate DKD. Rates of iohexol GFR (iGFR) and estimated GFR (eGFR) decline during the three-year study were compared by linear mixed effect regression between participants enrolled based on a history of moderately or severely increased albuminuria (N=394) and those enrolled based on a recent history of rapid kidney function decline (≥3 ml/min/1.73 m2/year) in the absence of a history of albuminuria (N=124). The association between baseline albuminuria and iGFR/eGFR decline during the trial was also evaluated.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nRates of eGFR decline during the trial were higher in participants with a history of albuminuria than in those with a history of rapid kidney function decline (-3.56 [95% confidence intervals {CI} -3.17, -3.95] versus -2.35 [95% CI: -1.86, -2.84] ml/min/1.73 m2/year, p=0.001). Results were similar for iGFR decline, although the difference was not significant (p=0.07). Within the history of albuminuria group, the rate of eGFR decline was -5.30 (95% CI -4.52, -6.08) ml/min/1.73m2/year in participants with severely increased albuminuria as compared to -2.97 (95% CI 2.44, -3.50) and -2.32 (95% CI -1.61, -3.03) ml/min/1.73m2/year in those with moderately increased or normal/mildly increased albuminuria at baseline (p<0.001).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nSeverely increased albuminuria at screening is a powerful criterion for selecting persons with T1D at high risk of kidney function decline. A history of rapid eGFR decline without a history of albuminuria is less effective for this purpose but it can still identify individuals with T1D who will lose kidney function more rapidly than expected from physiological aging.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION\r\nClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02017171.","PeriodicalId":50681,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Albuminuria and Rapid Kidney Function Decline as Selection Criteria for Kidney Clinical Trials in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Youngshin Keum,Maria Luiza Caramori,David Z Cherney,Jill P Crandall,Ian H de Boer,Ildiko Lingvay,Janet B McGill,Sarit Polsky,Rodica Pop-Busui,Peter Rossing,Ronald J Sigal,Michael Mauer,Alessandro Doria\",\"doi\":\"10.2215/cjn.0000000000000567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThe optimal criteria to select individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) and albuminuric or normoalbuminuric diabetic kidney disease (DKD), who are at risk of rapid kidney function decline, for clinical trials are unclear.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis study analyzed data from the Preventing Early Renal Loss in Diabetes (PERL) clinical trial, which investigated whether allopurinol slowed kidney function decline in persons with T1D and early-to-moderate DKD. Rates of iohexol GFR (iGFR) and estimated GFR (eGFR) decline during the three-year study were compared by linear mixed effect regression between participants enrolled based on a history of moderately or severely increased albuminuria (N=394) and those enrolled based on a recent history of rapid kidney function decline (≥3 ml/min/1.73 m2/year) in the absence of a history of albuminuria (N=124). The association between baseline albuminuria and iGFR/eGFR decline during the trial was also evaluated.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nRates of eGFR decline during the trial were higher in participants with a history of albuminuria than in those with a history of rapid kidney function decline (-3.56 [95% confidence intervals {CI} -3.17, -3.95] versus -2.35 [95% CI: -1.86, -2.84] ml/min/1.73 m2/year, p=0.001). Results were similar for iGFR decline, although the difference was not significant (p=0.07). Within the history of albuminuria group, the rate of eGFR decline was -5.30 (95% CI -4.52, -6.08) ml/min/1.73m2/year in participants with severely increased albuminuria as compared to -2.97 (95% CI 2.44, -3.50) and -2.32 (95% CI -1.61, -3.03) ml/min/1.73m2/year in those with moderately increased or normal/mildly increased albuminuria at baseline (p<0.001).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nSeverely increased albuminuria at screening is a powerful criterion for selecting persons with T1D at high risk of kidney function decline. A history of rapid eGFR decline without a history of albuminuria is less effective for this purpose but it can still identify individuals with T1D who will lose kidney function more rapidly than expected from physiological aging.\\r\\n\\r\\nCLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION\\r\\nClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02017171.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000000000567\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000000000567","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景选择1型糖尿病(T1D)和白蛋白尿或正常白蛋白尿型糖尿病肾病(DKD)患者进行临床试验的最佳标准尚不清楚,因为这些患者有肾功能快速下降的风险。方法本研究分析了预防糖尿病早期肾功能丧失(PERL)临床试验的数据,该试验研究了别嘌醇是否能减缓T1D和早期至中度DKD患者的肾功能下降。通过线性混合效应回归比较了三年研究期间异嘌呤醇 GFR (iGFR) 和估计 GFR (eGFR) 下降率,比较对象为有中度或重度白蛋白尿增高病史的入选者(394 人)和近期肾功能快速下降(≥3 毫升/分钟/1.73 平方米/年)且无白蛋白尿病史的入选者(124 人)。结果试验期间,有白蛋白尿史的参与者的 eGFR 下降率高于有肾功能快速下降史的参与者(-3.56 [95% 置信区间 {CI} -3.17, -3.95]对 -2.35 [95% CI: -1.86, -2.84]毫升/分钟/1.73平方米/年,P=0.001)。iGFR 下降的结果类似,但差异不显著(P=0.07)。在白蛋白尿病史组中,白蛋白尿严重增高者的 eGFR 下降率为-5.30(95% CI -4.52,-6.08)毫升/分钟/1.73 米2/年,而白蛋白尿中度增高者的 eGFR 下降率分别为-2.97(95% CI 2.44,-3.50)毫升/分钟/1.73 米2/年和-2.32(95% CI -1.61,-3.03)毫升/分钟/1.73 米2/年。结论筛查时白蛋白尿严重增加是选择肾功能衰退高风险 T1D 患者的有力标准。没有白蛋白尿的 eGFR 快速下降史在这方面的效果较差,但仍能识别出肾功能下降速度比生理衰老预期速度更快的 T1D 患者。
Albuminuria and Rapid Kidney Function Decline as Selection Criteria for Kidney Clinical Trials in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.
BACKGROUND
The optimal criteria to select individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) and albuminuric or normoalbuminuric diabetic kidney disease (DKD), who are at risk of rapid kidney function decline, for clinical trials are unclear.
METHODS
This study analyzed data from the Preventing Early Renal Loss in Diabetes (PERL) clinical trial, which investigated whether allopurinol slowed kidney function decline in persons with T1D and early-to-moderate DKD. Rates of iohexol GFR (iGFR) and estimated GFR (eGFR) decline during the three-year study were compared by linear mixed effect regression between participants enrolled based on a history of moderately or severely increased albuminuria (N=394) and those enrolled based on a recent history of rapid kidney function decline (≥3 ml/min/1.73 m2/year) in the absence of a history of albuminuria (N=124). The association between baseline albuminuria and iGFR/eGFR decline during the trial was also evaluated.
RESULTS
Rates of eGFR decline during the trial were higher in participants with a history of albuminuria than in those with a history of rapid kidney function decline (-3.56 [95% confidence intervals {CI} -3.17, -3.95] versus -2.35 [95% CI: -1.86, -2.84] ml/min/1.73 m2/year, p=0.001). Results were similar for iGFR decline, although the difference was not significant (p=0.07). Within the history of albuminuria group, the rate of eGFR decline was -5.30 (95% CI -4.52, -6.08) ml/min/1.73m2/year in participants with severely increased albuminuria as compared to -2.97 (95% CI 2.44, -3.50) and -2.32 (95% CI -1.61, -3.03) ml/min/1.73m2/year in those with moderately increased or normal/mildly increased albuminuria at baseline (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Severely increased albuminuria at screening is a powerful criterion for selecting persons with T1D at high risk of kidney function decline. A history of rapid eGFR decline without a history of albuminuria is less effective for this purpose but it can still identify individuals with T1D who will lose kidney function more rapidly than expected from physiological aging.
CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02017171.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology strives to establish itself as the foremost authority in communicating and influencing advances in clinical nephrology by (1) swiftly and effectively disseminating pivotal developments in clinical and translational research in nephrology, encompassing innovations in research methods and care delivery; (2) providing context for these advances in relation to future research directions and patient care; and (3) becoming a key voice on issues with potential implications for the clinical practice of nephrology, particularly within the United States. Original manuscript topics cover a range of areas, including Acid/Base and Electrolyte Disorders, Acute Kidney Injury and ICU Nephrology, Chronic Kidney Disease, Clinical Nephrology, Cystic Kidney Disease, Diabetes and the Kidney, Genetics, Geriatric and Palliative Nephrology, Glomerular and Tubulointerstitial Diseases, Hypertension, Maintenance Dialysis, Mineral Metabolism, Nephrolithiasis, and Transplantation.