Decrease in purifying selection pressures on wheat homoeologous genes: tetraploidization versus hexaploidization

A series of polyploidizations in higher-order polyploids is the main event affecting gene content in a genome. Each polyploidization event can lead to massive functional divergence because of the subsequent decrease in selection pressure on duplicated genes; however, the causal relationship between multiple rounds of polyploidization and the functional divergence of duplicated genes is poorly understood. We focused on the Triticum–Aegilops complex lineage and compared selection pressure before and after tetraploidization and hexaploidization events. Although both events led to decreased selection pressure on homoeologous gene pairs (compared with diploids and tetraploids), the initial tetraploidization had a greater impact on selection pressure on homoeologous gene pairs than did subsequent hexaploidization. Consistent with this, selection pressure on expression patterns for the initial event relaxed more than those for the subsequent event. Surprisingly, the decreased selection pressure on these homoeologous genes was independent of the existence of in-paralogs within the same subgenome. Wheat homoeologous pairs had different evolutionary consequences compared with orthologs related to other mechanisms (ancient allopolyploidization, ancient autopolyploidization, and small-scale duplication). Furthermore, tetraploidization and hexaploidization also seemed to have different evolutionary consequences. This suggests that homoeologous genes retain unique functions, including functions that are unlikely to be preserved in genes generated by the other duplication mechanisms. We found that their unique functions differed between tetraploidization and hexaploidization (e.g., reproductive and chromosome segregation processes). These findings imply that the substantial number of gene pairs resulting from multiple allopolyploidization events, especially initial tetraploidization, may have been a unique source of functional divergence.