Benjamin N. Herrmann, Cody A. Moore, Heather J. Johnson, Abhinav Humar, Kristen A. Shimko
{"title":"活体肝移植中单剂与双剂巴西利西单抗诱导疗法的评估","authors":"Benjamin N. Herrmann, Cody A. Moore, Heather J. Johnson, Abhinav Humar, Kristen A. Shimko","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Basiliximab is a high-cost induction agent typically given as two doses in liver transplant recipients. This study evaluated renal outcomes in live-donor liver transplant recipients (LDLTRs) with stable renal function at the time of transplant receiving one versus two doses of basiliximab.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively identified 231 adult LDLTR with a serum creatinine (SCr) <1.5 mg/dL on post-transplant Day 5. The primary endpoint was a change in SCr from post-transplant Days 5 to 30 between the groups. Secondary endpoints included incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), liver rejection, and culture-positive infections within 3 and 6 months of transplant. Basiliximab-related cost savings were also evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Median change in SCr from post-transplant Days 5 to 30 was no different between the single-dose or two-dose groups (0.1 [IQR: −0.1–0.3] vs. 0.2 [IQR: −0.1–0.4], <i>p</i> = 0.08). Incidence of AKI was 56.9% in the two-dose group versus 39.0% in the single-dose group (<i>p</i> = 0.01). There was no difference in bacterial (<i>p</i> = 0.40), fungal (<i>p</i> = 0.59), or viral (<i>p</i> = 0.78) infections. Acute cellular rejection through 6 months post-transplant was noted in 9.7% of patients receiving two doses and 6.3% in the single-dose arm (<i>p</i> = 0.42). Basiliximab-related cost savings in the single-dose arm was ∼$697 863.72 over 159 transplants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Single-dose basiliximab appears to be safe and effective in place of two doses in LDLTR with stable renal function on post-transplant Day 5. Utilization of a single basiliximab dose significantly reduced medication-related costs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Single Versus Two-Dose Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Live-Donor Liver Transplant\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin N. Herrmann, Cody A. Moore, Heather J. Johnson, Abhinav Humar, Kristen A. Shimko\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Basiliximab is a high-cost induction agent typically given as two doses in liver transplant recipients. This study evaluated renal outcomes in live-donor liver transplant recipients (LDLTRs) with stable renal function at the time of transplant receiving one versus two doses of basiliximab.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrospectively identified 231 adult LDLTR with a serum creatinine (SCr) <1.5 mg/dL on post-transplant Day 5. The primary endpoint was a change in SCr from post-transplant Days 5 to 30 between the groups. Secondary endpoints included incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), liver rejection, and culture-positive infections within 3 and 6 months of transplant. Basiliximab-related cost savings were also evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Median change in SCr from post-transplant Days 5 to 30 was no different between the single-dose or two-dose groups (0.1 [IQR: −0.1–0.3] vs. 0.2 [IQR: −0.1–0.4], <i>p</i> = 0.08). Incidence of AKI was 56.9% in the two-dose group versus 39.0% in the single-dose group (<i>p</i> = 0.01). There was no difference in bacterial (<i>p</i> = 0.40), fungal (<i>p</i> = 0.59), or viral (<i>p</i> = 0.78) infections. Acute cellular rejection through 6 months post-transplant was noted in 9.7% of patients receiving two doses and 6.3% in the single-dose arm (<i>p</i> = 0.42). Basiliximab-related cost savings in the single-dose arm was ∼$697 863.72 over 159 transplants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Single-dose basiliximab appears to be safe and effective in place of two doses in LDLTR with stable renal function on post-transplant Day 5. Utilization of a single basiliximab dose significantly reduced medication-related costs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"38 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Single Versus Two-Dose Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Live-Donor Liver Transplant
Background
Basiliximab is a high-cost induction agent typically given as two doses in liver transplant recipients. This study evaluated renal outcomes in live-donor liver transplant recipients (LDLTRs) with stable renal function at the time of transplant receiving one versus two doses of basiliximab.
Methods
We retrospectively identified 231 adult LDLTR with a serum creatinine (SCr) <1.5 mg/dL on post-transplant Day 5. The primary endpoint was a change in SCr from post-transplant Days 5 to 30 between the groups. Secondary endpoints included incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), liver rejection, and culture-positive infections within 3 and 6 months of transplant. Basiliximab-related cost savings were also evaluated.
Results
Median change in SCr from post-transplant Days 5 to 30 was no different between the single-dose or two-dose groups (0.1 [IQR: −0.1–0.3] vs. 0.2 [IQR: −0.1–0.4], p = 0.08). Incidence of AKI was 56.9% in the two-dose group versus 39.0% in the single-dose group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in bacterial (p = 0.40), fungal (p = 0.59), or viral (p = 0.78) infections. Acute cellular rejection through 6 months post-transplant was noted in 9.7% of patients receiving two doses and 6.3% in the single-dose arm (p = 0.42). Basiliximab-related cost savings in the single-dose arm was ∼$697 863.72 over 159 transplants.
Conclusions
Single-dose basiliximab appears to be safe and effective in place of two doses in LDLTR with stable renal function on post-transplant Day 5. Utilization of a single basiliximab dose significantly reduced medication-related costs.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.