从头部 CT 扫描进行深度学习,预测颅内压升高。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuroimaging Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1111/jon.13241
Ryota Sato, Yukinori Akiyama, Takeshi Mikami, Ayumu Yamaoka, Chie Kamada, Kyoya Sakashita, Yasuhiro Takahashi, Yusuke Kimura, Katsuya Komatsu, Nobuhiro Mikuni
{"title":"从头部 CT 扫描进行深度学习,预测颅内压升高。","authors":"Ryota Sato, Yukinori Akiyama, Takeshi Mikami, Ayumu Yamaoka, Chie Kamada, Kyoya Sakashita, Yasuhiro Takahashi, Yusuke Kimura, Katsuya Komatsu, Nobuhiro Mikuni","doi":"10.1111/jon.13241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) resulting from severe head injury or stroke poses a risk of secondary brain injury that requires neurosurgical intervention. However, currently available noninvasive monitoring techniques for predicting ICP are not sufficiently advanced. We aimed to develop a minimally invasive ICP prediction model using simple CT images to prevent secondary brain injury caused by elevated ICP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the following three methods to determine the presence or absence of elevated ICP using midbrain-level CT images: (1) a deep learning model created using the Python (PY) programming language; (2) a model based on cistern narrowing and scaling of brainstem deformities and presence of hydrocephalus, analyzed using the statistical tool Prediction One (PO); and (3) identification of ICP by senior residents (SRs). We compared the accuracy of the validation and test data using fivefold cross-validation and visualized or quantified the areas of interest in the models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of the validation data for the PY, PO, and SR methods was 83.68% (83.42%-85.13%), 85.71% (73.81%-88.10%), and 66.67% (55.96%-72.62%), respectively. Significant differences in accuracy were observed between the PY and SR methods. Test data accuracy was 77.27% (70.45%-77.2%), 84.09% (75.00%-85.23%), and 61.36% (56.82%-68.18%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the outcomes suggest that these newly developed models may be valuable tools for the rapid and accurate detection of elevated ICP in clinical practice. These models can easily be applied to other sites, as a single CT image at the midbrain level can provide a highly accurate diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroimaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning from head CT scans to predict elevated intracranial pressure.\",\"authors\":\"Ryota Sato, Yukinori Akiyama, Takeshi Mikami, Ayumu Yamaoka, Chie Kamada, Kyoya Sakashita, Yasuhiro Takahashi, Yusuke Kimura, Katsuya Komatsu, Nobuhiro Mikuni\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jon.13241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) resulting from severe head injury or stroke poses a risk of secondary brain injury that requires neurosurgical intervention. However, currently available noninvasive monitoring techniques for predicting ICP are not sufficiently advanced. We aimed to develop a minimally invasive ICP prediction model using simple CT images to prevent secondary brain injury caused by elevated ICP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the following three methods to determine the presence or absence of elevated ICP using midbrain-level CT images: (1) a deep learning model created using the Python (PY) programming language; (2) a model based on cistern narrowing and scaling of brainstem deformities and presence of hydrocephalus, analyzed using the statistical tool Prediction One (PO); and (3) identification of ICP by senior residents (SRs). We compared the accuracy of the validation and test data using fivefold cross-validation and visualized or quantified the areas of interest in the models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy of the validation data for the PY, PO, and SR methods was 83.68% (83.42%-85.13%), 85.71% (73.81%-88.10%), and 66.67% (55.96%-72.62%), respectively. Significant differences in accuracy were observed between the PY and SR methods. Test data accuracy was 77.27% (70.45%-77.2%), 84.09% (75.00%-85.23%), and 61.36% (56.82%-68.18%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the outcomes suggest that these newly developed models may be valuable tools for the rapid and accurate detection of elevated ICP in clinical practice. These models can easily be applied to other sites, as a single CT image at the midbrain level can provide a highly accurate diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.13241\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.13241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:严重颅脑损伤或中风导致的颅内压(ICP)升高有可能造成继发性脑损伤,需要神经外科手术干预。然而,目前用于预测 ICP 的无创监测技术还不够先进。我们旨在利用简单的 CT 图像开发一种微创的 ICP 预测模型,以防止 ICP 升高造成继发性脑损伤:我们使用以下三种方法通过中脑水平的 CT 图像来判断是否存在 ICP 升高:(1)使用 Python(PY)编程语言创建的深度学习模型;(2)使用统计工具 Prediction One(PO)分析的基于脑干畸形和存在脑积水的蝶窦狭窄和缩放的模型;以及(3)由资深住院医师(SR)识别 ICP。我们使用五倍交叉验证法比较了验证数据和测试数据的准确性,并对模型中的相关区域进行了可视化或量化:PY、PO 和 SR 方法的验证数据准确率分别为 83.68%(83.42%-85.13%)、85.71%(73.81%-88.10%)和 66.67%(55.96%-72.62%)。PY方法和SR方法的准确率存在显著差异。测试数据准确率分别为 77.27%(70.45%-77.2%)、84.09%(75.00%-85.23%)和 61.36%(56.82%-68.18%):总之,研究结果表明,这些新开发的模型可能是在临床实践中快速准确检测 ICP 升高的重要工具。这些模型很容易应用到其他部位,因为中脑水平的单张 CT 图像就能提供高度准确的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep learning from head CT scans to predict elevated intracranial pressure.

Background and purpose: Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) resulting from severe head injury or stroke poses a risk of secondary brain injury that requires neurosurgical intervention. However, currently available noninvasive monitoring techniques for predicting ICP are not sufficiently advanced. We aimed to develop a minimally invasive ICP prediction model using simple CT images to prevent secondary brain injury caused by elevated ICP.

Methods: We used the following three methods to determine the presence or absence of elevated ICP using midbrain-level CT images: (1) a deep learning model created using the Python (PY) programming language; (2) a model based on cistern narrowing and scaling of brainstem deformities and presence of hydrocephalus, analyzed using the statistical tool Prediction One (PO); and (3) identification of ICP by senior residents (SRs). We compared the accuracy of the validation and test data using fivefold cross-validation and visualized or quantified the areas of interest in the models.

Results: The accuracy of the validation data for the PY, PO, and SR methods was 83.68% (83.42%-85.13%), 85.71% (73.81%-88.10%), and 66.67% (55.96%-72.62%), respectively. Significant differences in accuracy were observed between the PY and SR methods. Test data accuracy was 77.27% (70.45%-77.2%), 84.09% (75.00%-85.23%), and 61.36% (56.82%-68.18%), respectively.

Conclusions: Overall, the outcomes suggest that these newly developed models may be valuable tools for the rapid and accurate detection of elevated ICP in clinical practice. These models can easily be applied to other sites, as a single CT image at the midbrain level can provide a highly accurate diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroimaging
Journal of Neuroimaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Start reading the Journal of Neuroimaging to learn the latest neurological imaging techniques. The peer-reviewed research is written in a practical clinical context, giving you the information you need on: MRI CT Carotid Ultrasound and TCD SPECT PET Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology Functional MRI Xenon CT and other new and upcoming neuroscientific modalities.The Journal of Neuroimaging addresses the full spectrum of human nervous system disease, including stroke, neoplasia, degenerating and demyelinating disease, epilepsy, tumors, lesions, infectious disease, cerebral vascular arterial diseases, toxic-metabolic disease, psychoses, dementias, heredo-familial disease, and trauma.Offering original research, review articles, case reports, neuroimaging CPCs, and evaluations of instruments and technology relevant to the nervous system, the Journal of Neuroimaging focuses on useful clinical developments and applications, tested techniques and interpretations, patient care, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Start reading today!
期刊最新文献
Multicenter validation of automated detection of paramagnetic rim lesions on brain MRI in multiple sclerosis. Neuromuscular ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of radial tunnel syndrome and lateral epicondylitis. Quantification of porcine lower thoracic spinal cord morphology with intact dura mater using high-resolution μCT. Slowly expanding lesions are associated with disease activity and gray matter loss in relapse-onset multiple sclerosis. Deep learning from head CT scans to predict elevated intracranial pressure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1