根据免疫相关基因确定卵巢癌的三种亚型并构建预后模型。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY Journal of Ovarian Research Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1186/s13048-024-01526-w
Wen Gao, Hui Yuan, Sheng Yin, Renfang Deng, Zhaodong Ji
{"title":"根据免疫相关基因确定卵巢癌的三种亚型并构建预后模型。","authors":"Wen Gao, Hui Yuan, Sheng Yin, Renfang Deng, Zhaodong Ji","doi":"10.1186/s13048-024-01526-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of ovarian cancer (OC), but different immune microenvironments often constrain the efficacy of immunotherapeutic interventions. Therefore, there is an imperative to delineate novel immune subtypes for development of efficacious immunotherapeutic strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The immune subtypes of OC were identified by consensus cluster analysis. The differences in clinical features, genetic mutations, mRNA stemness (mRNAsi) and immune microenvironments were analyzed among subtypes. Subsequently, prognostic risk models were constructed based on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of the immune subtypes using weighted correlation network analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OC patients were classified into three immune subtypes with distinct survival rates and clinical features. Different subtypes exhibited varying tumor mutation burdens, homologous recombination deficiencies, and mRNAsi levels. Significant differences were observed among immune subtypes in terms of immune checkpoint expression and immunogenic cell death. Prognostic risk models were validated as independent prognostic factors demonstrated great predictive performance for survival of OC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, three distinct immune subtypes were identified based on gene sets related to vaccine response, with the C2 subtype exhibiting significantly worse prognosis. While no statistically significant differences in tumor mutation burden (TMB) were observed across the three subtypes, the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score and mRNA stemness index (mRNAsi) were notably elevated in the C2 group compared to the others. Immune infiltration analysis indicated that the C2 subtype may have an increased presence of regulatory T (Treg) cells, potentially contributing to a more favorable response to combination therapies involving PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy. These findings offer a precision medicine approach for tailoring immunotherapy in ovarian cancer patients. Moreover, the C3 subtype demonstrated significantly lower expression levels of immune checkpoint genes, a pattern validated by independent datasets, and associated with a better prognosis. Further investigation revealed that the immune-related gene FCRL5 correlates with ovarian cancer prognosis, with in vitro experiments showing that it influences the proliferation and migration of the ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3.</p>","PeriodicalId":16610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ovarian Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of three subtypes of ovarian cancer and construction of prognostic models based on immune-related genes.\",\"authors\":\"Wen Gao, Hui Yuan, Sheng Yin, Renfang Deng, Zhaodong Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13048-024-01526-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of ovarian cancer (OC), but different immune microenvironments often constrain the efficacy of immunotherapeutic interventions. Therefore, there is an imperative to delineate novel immune subtypes for development of efficacious immunotherapeutic strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The immune subtypes of OC were identified by consensus cluster analysis. The differences in clinical features, genetic mutations, mRNA stemness (mRNAsi) and immune microenvironments were analyzed among subtypes. Subsequently, prognostic risk models were constructed based on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of the immune subtypes using weighted correlation network analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OC patients were classified into three immune subtypes with distinct survival rates and clinical features. Different subtypes exhibited varying tumor mutation burdens, homologous recombination deficiencies, and mRNAsi levels. Significant differences were observed among immune subtypes in terms of immune checkpoint expression and immunogenic cell death. Prognostic risk models were validated as independent prognostic factors demonstrated great predictive performance for survival of OC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, three distinct immune subtypes were identified based on gene sets related to vaccine response, with the C2 subtype exhibiting significantly worse prognosis. While no statistically significant differences in tumor mutation burden (TMB) were observed across the three subtypes, the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score and mRNA stemness index (mRNAsi) were notably elevated in the C2 group compared to the others. Immune infiltration analysis indicated that the C2 subtype may have an increased presence of regulatory T (Treg) cells, potentially contributing to a more favorable response to combination therapies involving PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy. These findings offer a precision medicine approach for tailoring immunotherapy in ovarian cancer patients. Moreover, the C3 subtype demonstrated significantly lower expression levels of immune checkpoint genes, a pattern validated by independent datasets, and associated with a better prognosis. Further investigation revealed that the immune-related gene FCRL5 correlates with ovarian cancer prognosis, with in vitro experiments showing that it influences the proliferation and migration of the ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ovarian Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492668/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ovarian Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01526-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ovarian Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01526-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫疗法为卵巢癌(OC)的治疗带来了革命性的变化,但不同的免疫微环境往往会制约免疫治疗干预措施的疗效。因此,当务之急是划定新的免疫亚型,以开发有效的免疫治疗策略:方法:通过共识聚类分析确定了 OC 的免疫亚型。方法:通过共识聚类分析确定了 OC 的免疫亚型,并分析了不同亚型在临床特征、基因突变、mRNA 干性(mRNAsi)和免疫微环境方面的差异。随后,利用加权相关网络分析,根据免疫亚型的差异表达基因(DEGs)构建了预后风险模型:结果:OC 患者被分为三种免疫亚型,其生存率和临床特征各不相同。不同亚型表现出不同的肿瘤突变负荷、同源重组缺陷和 mRNAsi 水平。免疫亚型之间在免疫检查点表达和免疫原性细胞死亡方面存在显著差异。预后风险模型被验证为独立的预后因素,对OC患者的生存有很好的预测作用:本研究根据与疫苗反应相关的基因组确定了三种不同的免疫亚型,其中 C2 亚型的预后明显较差。虽然三种亚型的肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)在统计学上没有明显差异,但与其他亚型相比,C2组的同源重组缺陷(HRD)评分和mRNA干性指数(mRNAsi)明显升高。免疫浸润分析表明,C2亚型可能存在更多的调节性T(Treg)细胞,这可能有助于对涉及PARP抑制剂和免疫疗法的联合疗法产生更有利的反应。这些发现为卵巢癌患者定制免疫疗法提供了一种精准医疗方法。此外,C3亚型的免疫检查点基因表达水平明显较低,这一模式已被独立数据集验证,并与较好的预后相关。进一步研究发现,免疫相关基因FCRL5与卵巢癌预后相关,体外实验显示它影响卵巢癌细胞系SKOV3的增殖和迁移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identification of three subtypes of ovarian cancer and construction of prognostic models based on immune-related genes.

Background: Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of ovarian cancer (OC), but different immune microenvironments often constrain the efficacy of immunotherapeutic interventions. Therefore, there is an imperative to delineate novel immune subtypes for development of efficacious immunotherapeutic strategies.

Methods: The immune subtypes of OC were identified by consensus cluster analysis. The differences in clinical features, genetic mutations, mRNA stemness (mRNAsi) and immune microenvironments were analyzed among subtypes. Subsequently, prognostic risk models were constructed based on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of the immune subtypes using weighted correlation network analysis.

Results: OC patients were classified into three immune subtypes with distinct survival rates and clinical features. Different subtypes exhibited varying tumor mutation burdens, homologous recombination deficiencies, and mRNAsi levels. Significant differences were observed among immune subtypes in terms of immune checkpoint expression and immunogenic cell death. Prognostic risk models were validated as independent prognostic factors demonstrated great predictive performance for survival of OC patients.

Conclusion: In this study, three distinct immune subtypes were identified based on gene sets related to vaccine response, with the C2 subtype exhibiting significantly worse prognosis. While no statistically significant differences in tumor mutation burden (TMB) were observed across the three subtypes, the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score and mRNA stemness index (mRNAsi) were notably elevated in the C2 group compared to the others. Immune infiltration analysis indicated that the C2 subtype may have an increased presence of regulatory T (Treg) cells, potentially contributing to a more favorable response to combination therapies involving PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy. These findings offer a precision medicine approach for tailoring immunotherapy in ovarian cancer patients. Moreover, the C3 subtype demonstrated significantly lower expression levels of immune checkpoint genes, a pattern validated by independent datasets, and associated with a better prognosis. Further investigation revealed that the immune-related gene FCRL5 correlates with ovarian cancer prognosis, with in vitro experiments showing that it influences the proliferation and migration of the ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ovarian Research
Journal of Ovarian Research REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ovarian Research is an open access, peer reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a forum for high-quality basic and clinical research on ovarian function, abnormalities, and cancer. The journal focuses on research that provides new insights into ovarian functions as well as prevention and treatment of diseases afflicting the organ. Topical areas include, but are not restricted to: Ovary development, hormone secretion and regulation Follicle growth and ovulation Infertility and Polycystic ovarian syndrome Regulation of pituitary and other biological functions by ovarian hormones Ovarian cancer, its prevention, diagnosis and treatment Drug development and screening Role of stem cells in ovary development and function.
期刊最新文献
A novel ITGB8 transcript variant sustains ovarian cancer cell survival through genomic instability and altered ploidy on a mutant p53 background. Machine learning models in evaluating the malignancy risk of ovarian tumors: a comparative study. ATF3 mediates PM2.5-induced apoptosis and inflammation in ovarian granulosa cells. Causal relationship between inflammatory cytokines and polycystic ovary syndrome: a bidirectional mendelian randomization study. Implication of vasopressin receptor genes (AVPR1A and AVPR1B) in the susceptibility to polycystic ovary syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1