老年人通过步行干预改善步速的相关特征:应答者分析。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Gait & posture Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.10.010
Valerie Shuman , Jessie M. VanSwearingen , Subashan Perera , Kathleen K. Mangione , Janet K. Freburger , Jennifer S. Brach
{"title":"老年人通过步行干预改善步速的相关特征:应答者分析。","authors":"Valerie Shuman ,&nbsp;Jessie M. VanSwearingen ,&nbsp;Subashan Perera ,&nbsp;Kathleen K. Mangione ,&nbsp;Janet K. Freburger ,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Brach","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Some older adults benefit to a great degree from walking interventions and others experience little improvement. Understanding the personal characteristics associated with greater treatment response to different interventions could assist clinicians in providing patients with matched interventions to optimize both outcomes and resource use.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>What personal characteristics are associated with improved gait speed for older adults participating in walking interventions?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a secondary analysis of 236 older adults from a trial comparing “Standard” (lower-extremity strength and walking endurance) to “Plus” (additional task-specific training for walking) interventions on gait speed in older adults (≥65 years). Predictors included sociodemographic characteristics, health status, physical performance, and self-reported function. We fitted linear regression models to 12-week change in gait speed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Predictors of improved gait speed in Standard group included: younger age (β=-0.015), lower BMI (β=-0.005), slower gait speed (β=-0.015), longer Figure 8 Walk time (β=0.010), and higher Late Life Function and Disability Instrument scores (β=0.003). The parsimonious set of multivariable predictors were never married (β=0.081), not a caregiver (β=0.208), no cancer history (β=-0.052), slower chair rise times (β=0.010), slower gait speed (β=-0.021), and better overall function and disability (β=0.006).</div><div>Predictors of improved gait speed in Plus group included: lower BMI (β=-0.004), farther Six-Minute Walk distance (β=0.014), and greater modified Gait Efficacy Scale (β=0.002). The parsimonious set of multivariable predictors were increased age (β=0.026), no cardiovascular disease (β=0.137), greater total physical activity counts per day (β=0.003), slower baseline gait speed (β=-0.072), and longer Six-Minute Walk distance (β=0.054).</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Those with the combination of suboptimal physical performance and strong self-report of function may benefit from standard strength and conditioning. Individuals may best respond to task-specific training when health status and physical performance are suboptimal and not overtly compromised. Matching interventions with personal characteristics may enhance efficacy of treatments to improve walking in older adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 263-269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics associated with gait speed improvements from walking interventions for older adults: A responder analysis\",\"authors\":\"Valerie Shuman ,&nbsp;Jessie M. VanSwearingen ,&nbsp;Subashan Perera ,&nbsp;Kathleen K. Mangione ,&nbsp;Janet K. Freburger ,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Brach\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.10.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Some older adults benefit to a great degree from walking interventions and others experience little improvement. Understanding the personal characteristics associated with greater treatment response to different interventions could assist clinicians in providing patients with matched interventions to optimize both outcomes and resource use.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>What personal characteristics are associated with improved gait speed for older adults participating in walking interventions?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a secondary analysis of 236 older adults from a trial comparing “Standard” (lower-extremity strength and walking endurance) to “Plus” (additional task-specific training for walking) interventions on gait speed in older adults (≥65 years). Predictors included sociodemographic characteristics, health status, physical performance, and self-reported function. We fitted linear regression models to 12-week change in gait speed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Predictors of improved gait speed in Standard group included: younger age (β=-0.015), lower BMI (β=-0.005), slower gait speed (β=-0.015), longer Figure 8 Walk time (β=0.010), and higher Late Life Function and Disability Instrument scores (β=0.003). The parsimonious set of multivariable predictors were never married (β=0.081), not a caregiver (β=0.208), no cancer history (β=-0.052), slower chair rise times (β=0.010), slower gait speed (β=-0.021), and better overall function and disability (β=0.006).</div><div>Predictors of improved gait speed in Plus group included: lower BMI (β=-0.004), farther Six-Minute Walk distance (β=0.014), and greater modified Gait Efficacy Scale (β=0.002). The parsimonious set of multivariable predictors were increased age (β=0.026), no cardiovascular disease (β=0.137), greater total physical activity counts per day (β=0.003), slower baseline gait speed (β=-0.072), and longer Six-Minute Walk distance (β=0.054).</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Those with the combination of suboptimal physical performance and strong self-report of function may benefit from standard strength and conditioning. Individuals may best respond to task-specific training when health status and physical performance are suboptimal and not overtly compromised. Matching interventions with personal characteristics may enhance efficacy of treatments to improve walking in older adults.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 263-269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636224006428\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636224006428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一些老年人从步行干预中获益匪浅,而另一些则改善甚微。了解与对不同干预措施的治疗反应相关的个人特征,有助于临床医生为患者提供匹配的干预措施,以优化治疗效果和资源利用:研究问题:哪些个人特征与参与步行干预的老年人步速改善相关?这是一项对236名老年人进行的二次分析,这些老年人来自一项比较 "标准"(下肢力量和步行耐力)和 "加强"(针对步行的额外任务训练)干预措施对老年人(≥65岁)步速影响的试验。预测因素包括社会人口学特征、健康状况、体能表现和自我功能报告。我们对 12 周的步速变化建立了线性回归模型:结果:标准组步速改善的预测因素包括:年龄较小(β=-0.015)、体重指数较低(β=-0.005)、步速较慢(β=-0.015)、图 8 步行时间较长(β=0.010)、晚年功能和残疾量表评分较高(β=0.003)。多变量预测因子的拟合集合为:从未结婚(β=0.081)、非照顾者(β=0.208)、无癌症病史(β=-0.052)、较慢的椅子起立时间(β=0.010)、较慢的步速(β=-0.021)以及较好的整体功能和残疾状况(β=0.006)。加法组步态速度改善的预测因素包括:较低的体重指数(β=-0.004)、较远的六分钟步行距离(β=0.014)和较大的改良步态功效量表(β=0.002)。多变量预测因子的拟合值为年龄增大(β=0.026)、无心血管疾病(β=0.137)、每天总体力活动次数增加(β=0.003)、基线步速较慢(β=-0.072)和六分钟步行距离较长(β=0.054):意义:那些身体机能不达标且自我报告功能较强的人可能会从标准的力量和体能训练中受益。当健康状况和体能表现都不理想但没有明显受损时,个人可能会对特定任务训练做出最佳反应。将干预措施与个人特征相匹配,可提高改善老年人步行的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characteristics associated with gait speed improvements from walking interventions for older adults: A responder analysis

Background

Some older adults benefit to a great degree from walking interventions and others experience little improvement. Understanding the personal characteristics associated with greater treatment response to different interventions could assist clinicians in providing patients with matched interventions to optimize both outcomes and resource use.

Research question

What personal characteristics are associated with improved gait speed for older adults participating in walking interventions?

Methods

This was a secondary analysis of 236 older adults from a trial comparing “Standard” (lower-extremity strength and walking endurance) to “Plus” (additional task-specific training for walking) interventions on gait speed in older adults (≥65 years). Predictors included sociodemographic characteristics, health status, physical performance, and self-reported function. We fitted linear regression models to 12-week change in gait speed.

Results

Predictors of improved gait speed in Standard group included: younger age (β=-0.015), lower BMI (β=-0.005), slower gait speed (β=-0.015), longer Figure 8 Walk time (β=0.010), and higher Late Life Function and Disability Instrument scores (β=0.003). The parsimonious set of multivariable predictors were never married (β=0.081), not a caregiver (β=0.208), no cancer history (β=-0.052), slower chair rise times (β=0.010), slower gait speed (β=-0.021), and better overall function and disability (β=0.006).
Predictors of improved gait speed in Plus group included: lower BMI (β=-0.004), farther Six-Minute Walk distance (β=0.014), and greater modified Gait Efficacy Scale (β=0.002). The parsimonious set of multivariable predictors were increased age (β=0.026), no cardiovascular disease (β=0.137), greater total physical activity counts per day (β=0.003), slower baseline gait speed (β=-0.072), and longer Six-Minute Walk distance (β=0.054).

Significance

Those with the combination of suboptimal physical performance and strong self-report of function may benefit from standard strength and conditioning. Individuals may best respond to task-specific training when health status and physical performance are suboptimal and not overtly compromised. Matching interventions with personal characteristics may enhance efficacy of treatments to improve walking in older adults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gait & posture
Gait & posture 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
616
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.
期刊最新文献
Gait cycle and pressure load values of the foot on different surfaces with Moticon Insole2 in a healthy cohort Editorial Board The associations of body composition, fitness, and physical activity with balance in children: The Arkansas Active Kids Study The investigation of nonlinear variability underlying postural control in the injure-limb in individuals with and without chronic ankle instability Preoperative gait pattern as predictor of gait changes following selective dorsal rhizotomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1