Valerie Shuman , Jessie M. VanSwearingen , Subashan Perera , Kathleen K. Mangione , Janet K. Freburger , Jennifer S. Brach
{"title":"老年人通过步行干预改善步速的相关特征:应答者分析。","authors":"Valerie Shuman , Jessie M. VanSwearingen , Subashan Perera , Kathleen K. Mangione , Janet K. Freburger , Jennifer S. Brach","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Some older adults benefit to a great degree from walking interventions and others experience little improvement. Understanding the personal characteristics associated with greater treatment response to different interventions could assist clinicians in providing patients with matched interventions to optimize both outcomes and resource use.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>What personal characteristics are associated with improved gait speed for older adults participating in walking interventions?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a secondary analysis of 236 older adults from a trial comparing “Standard” (lower-extremity strength and walking endurance) to “Plus” (additional task-specific training for walking) interventions on gait speed in older adults (≥65 years). Predictors included sociodemographic characteristics, health status, physical performance, and self-reported function. We fitted linear regression models to 12-week change in gait speed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Predictors of improved gait speed in Standard group included: younger age (β=-0.015), lower BMI (β=-0.005), slower gait speed (β=-0.015), longer Figure 8 Walk time (β=0.010), and higher Late Life Function and Disability Instrument scores (β=0.003). The parsimonious set of multivariable predictors were never married (β=0.081), not a caregiver (β=0.208), no cancer history (β=-0.052), slower chair rise times (β=0.010), slower gait speed (β=-0.021), and better overall function and disability (β=0.006).</div><div>Predictors of improved gait speed in Plus group included: lower BMI (β=-0.004), farther Six-Minute Walk distance (β=0.014), and greater modified Gait Efficacy Scale (β=0.002). The parsimonious set of multivariable predictors were increased age (β=0.026), no cardiovascular disease (β=0.137), greater total physical activity counts per day (β=0.003), slower baseline gait speed (β=-0.072), and longer Six-Minute Walk distance (β=0.054).</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Those with the combination of suboptimal physical performance and strong self-report of function may benefit from standard strength and conditioning. Individuals may best respond to task-specific training when health status and physical performance are suboptimal and not overtly compromised. Matching interventions with personal characteristics may enhance efficacy of treatments to improve walking in older adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 263-269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics associated with gait speed improvements from walking interventions for older adults: A responder analysis\",\"authors\":\"Valerie Shuman , Jessie M. VanSwearingen , Subashan Perera , Kathleen K. Mangione , Janet K. Freburger , Jennifer S. Brach\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.10.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Some older adults benefit to a great degree from walking interventions and others experience little improvement. Understanding the personal characteristics associated with greater treatment response to different interventions could assist clinicians in providing patients with matched interventions to optimize both outcomes and resource use.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>What personal characteristics are associated with improved gait speed for older adults participating in walking interventions?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a secondary analysis of 236 older adults from a trial comparing “Standard” (lower-extremity strength and walking endurance) to “Plus” (additional task-specific training for walking) interventions on gait speed in older adults (≥65 years). Predictors included sociodemographic characteristics, health status, physical performance, and self-reported function. We fitted linear regression models to 12-week change in gait speed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Predictors of improved gait speed in Standard group included: younger age (β=-0.015), lower BMI (β=-0.005), slower gait speed (β=-0.015), longer Figure 8 Walk time (β=0.010), and higher Late Life Function and Disability Instrument scores (β=0.003). The parsimonious set of multivariable predictors were never married (β=0.081), not a caregiver (β=0.208), no cancer history (β=-0.052), slower chair rise times (β=0.010), slower gait speed (β=-0.021), and better overall function and disability (β=0.006).</div><div>Predictors of improved gait speed in Plus group included: lower BMI (β=-0.004), farther Six-Minute Walk distance (β=0.014), and greater modified Gait Efficacy Scale (β=0.002). The parsimonious set of multivariable predictors were increased age (β=0.026), no cardiovascular disease (β=0.137), greater total physical activity counts per day (β=0.003), slower baseline gait speed (β=-0.072), and longer Six-Minute Walk distance (β=0.054).</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Those with the combination of suboptimal physical performance and strong self-report of function may benefit from standard strength and conditioning. Individuals may best respond to task-specific training when health status and physical performance are suboptimal and not overtly compromised. Matching interventions with personal characteristics may enhance efficacy of treatments to improve walking in older adults.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 263-269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636224006428\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636224006428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Characteristics associated with gait speed improvements from walking interventions for older adults: A responder analysis
Background
Some older adults benefit to a great degree from walking interventions and others experience little improvement. Understanding the personal characteristics associated with greater treatment response to different interventions could assist clinicians in providing patients with matched interventions to optimize both outcomes and resource use.
Research question
What personal characteristics are associated with improved gait speed for older adults participating in walking interventions?
Methods
This was a secondary analysis of 236 older adults from a trial comparing “Standard” (lower-extremity strength and walking endurance) to “Plus” (additional task-specific training for walking) interventions on gait speed in older adults (≥65 years). Predictors included sociodemographic characteristics, health status, physical performance, and self-reported function. We fitted linear regression models to 12-week change in gait speed.
Results
Predictors of improved gait speed in Standard group included: younger age (β=-0.015), lower BMI (β=-0.005), slower gait speed (β=-0.015), longer Figure 8 Walk time (β=0.010), and higher Late Life Function and Disability Instrument scores (β=0.003). The parsimonious set of multivariable predictors were never married (β=0.081), not a caregiver (β=0.208), no cancer history (β=-0.052), slower chair rise times (β=0.010), slower gait speed (β=-0.021), and better overall function and disability (β=0.006).
Predictors of improved gait speed in Plus group included: lower BMI (β=-0.004), farther Six-Minute Walk distance (β=0.014), and greater modified Gait Efficacy Scale (β=0.002). The parsimonious set of multivariable predictors were increased age (β=0.026), no cardiovascular disease (β=0.137), greater total physical activity counts per day (β=0.003), slower baseline gait speed (β=-0.072), and longer Six-Minute Walk distance (β=0.054).
Significance
Those with the combination of suboptimal physical performance and strong self-report of function may benefit from standard strength and conditioning. Individuals may best respond to task-specific training when health status and physical performance are suboptimal and not overtly compromised. Matching interventions with personal characteristics may enhance efficacy of treatments to improve walking in older adults.
期刊介绍:
Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance.
The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.