系统性红斑狼疮低剂量IL-2疗法疗效的预测性生物标志物:临床分析

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Arthritis Research & Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1186/s13075-024-03388-5
Ruiling Feng, Xian Xiao, Bo Huang, Kai Zhang, Xia Zhang, Zhanguo Li, Yuan Jia, Jing He
{"title":"系统性红斑狼疮低剂量IL-2疗法疗效的预测性生物标志物:临床分析","authors":"Ruiling Feng, Xian Xiao, Bo Huang, Kai Zhang, Xia Zhang, Zhanguo Li, Yuan Jia, Jing He","doi":"10.1186/s13075-024-03388-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low-dose IL-2 (Ld-IL2) has shown favorable therapeutic effects in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) therapy. However, previous clinical trials reported an SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) response rate of 65.52%-68%, with approximately half failing to achieve the primary endpoint by week 24. Our study aims to determine the real-world use of Ld-IL2 and to identify determinants of its effectiveness in SLE. We pooled data from 342 SLE patients undergoing sequential Ld-IL2 treatment, with 314 persisting for over 3 months were included in effectiveness and prediction analyses. All patients were categorized into responder (n = 136) and non-responder group (n = 178) according to SRI-4. Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) was also analyzed to validate our results. Rash, lower complement 3 (C3), and renal involvement including urine protein, urine occult blood and urine casts emerged as prominent predictors of achieving SRI-4. Adjusting for baseline values using the ratio of change to baseline revealed significant differences in CD4 + T cell immune profiles between responders and non-responders. ROC analysis confirmed a satisfactory performance of rash, renal involvement, percentage change of CD4 + T cells, and C3 in predicting SRI-4, yielding an AUC of 0.933. LLDAS analysis showed that hematological involvements and lower CLA + Treg were potent predictive markers in LLDAS attainment. Conversely, renal involvement failed to have significant association in achieving LLDAS. The analysis of background therapy in SLE patients showed that MMF was more likely to reach the SRI-4 response with the combination of Ld-IL2. These findings uncovered the predictors of Ld-IL2 treatment efficacy in SLE patients and provided guidance to physicians for rational utilization.","PeriodicalId":8419,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive biomarkers for low-dose IL-2 therapy efficacy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a clinical analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ruiling Feng, Xian Xiao, Bo Huang, Kai Zhang, Xia Zhang, Zhanguo Li, Yuan Jia, Jing He\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13075-024-03388-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Low-dose IL-2 (Ld-IL2) has shown favorable therapeutic effects in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) therapy. However, previous clinical trials reported an SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) response rate of 65.52%-68%, with approximately half failing to achieve the primary endpoint by week 24. Our study aims to determine the real-world use of Ld-IL2 and to identify determinants of its effectiveness in SLE. We pooled data from 342 SLE patients undergoing sequential Ld-IL2 treatment, with 314 persisting for over 3 months were included in effectiveness and prediction analyses. All patients were categorized into responder (n = 136) and non-responder group (n = 178) according to SRI-4. Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) was also analyzed to validate our results. Rash, lower complement 3 (C3), and renal involvement including urine protein, urine occult blood and urine casts emerged as prominent predictors of achieving SRI-4. Adjusting for baseline values using the ratio of change to baseline revealed significant differences in CD4 + T cell immune profiles between responders and non-responders. ROC analysis confirmed a satisfactory performance of rash, renal involvement, percentage change of CD4 + T cells, and C3 in predicting SRI-4, yielding an AUC of 0.933. LLDAS analysis showed that hematological involvements and lower CLA + Treg were potent predictive markers in LLDAS attainment. Conversely, renal involvement failed to have significant association in achieving LLDAS. The analysis of background therapy in SLE patients showed that MMF was more likely to reach the SRI-4 response with the combination of Ld-IL2. These findings uncovered the predictors of Ld-IL2 treatment efficacy in SLE patients and provided guidance to physicians for rational utilization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03388-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03388-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低剂量 IL-2(Ld-IL2)在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)治疗中显示出良好的疗效。然而,之前的临床试验报告显示,系统性红斑狼疮应答者指数-4(SRI-4)的应答率为65.52%-68%,其中约有一半患者在第24周时未能达到主要终点。我们的研究旨在确定 Ld-IL2 在现实世界中的使用情况,并找出其对系统性红斑狼疮疗效的决定因素。我们汇总了342名接受Ld-IL2序贯治疗的系统性红斑狼疮患者的数据,其中314名患者的疗效和预测分析持续了3个月以上。根据SRI-4将所有患者分为有反应组(136人)和无反应组(178人)。为了验证我们的结果,还对狼疮低疾病活动状态(LLDAS)进行了分析。皮疹、补体3(C3)降低和肾脏受累(包括尿蛋白、尿潜血和尿铸型)是达到SRI-4的主要预测因素。用变化与基线的比值调整基线值后,发现应答者和非应答者的 CD4 + T 细胞免疫特征存在显著差异。ROC分析证实,皮疹、肾脏受累、CD4 + T细胞百分比变化和C3在预测SRI-4方面的表现令人满意,AUC为0.933。LLDAS 分析表明,血液学受累和较低的 CLA + Treg 是 LLDAS 达标的有力预测指标。相反,肾脏受累与达到LLDAS没有显著关联。对系统性红斑狼疮患者背景疗法的分析表明,MMF与Ld-IL2联用更有可能达到SRI-4反应。这些发现揭示了系统性红斑狼疮患者Ld-IL2疗效的预测因素,为医生合理使用Ld-IL2提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive biomarkers for low-dose IL-2 therapy efficacy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a clinical analysis
Low-dose IL-2 (Ld-IL2) has shown favorable therapeutic effects in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) therapy. However, previous clinical trials reported an SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4) response rate of 65.52%-68%, with approximately half failing to achieve the primary endpoint by week 24. Our study aims to determine the real-world use of Ld-IL2 and to identify determinants of its effectiveness in SLE. We pooled data from 342 SLE patients undergoing sequential Ld-IL2 treatment, with 314 persisting for over 3 months were included in effectiveness and prediction analyses. All patients were categorized into responder (n = 136) and non-responder group (n = 178) according to SRI-4. Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) was also analyzed to validate our results. Rash, lower complement 3 (C3), and renal involvement including urine protein, urine occult blood and urine casts emerged as prominent predictors of achieving SRI-4. Adjusting for baseline values using the ratio of change to baseline revealed significant differences in CD4 + T cell immune profiles between responders and non-responders. ROC analysis confirmed a satisfactory performance of rash, renal involvement, percentage change of CD4 + T cells, and C3 in predicting SRI-4, yielding an AUC of 0.933. LLDAS analysis showed that hematological involvements and lower CLA + Treg were potent predictive markers in LLDAS attainment. Conversely, renal involvement failed to have significant association in achieving LLDAS. The analysis of background therapy in SLE patients showed that MMF was more likely to reach the SRI-4 response with the combination of Ld-IL2. These findings uncovered the predictors of Ld-IL2 treatment efficacy in SLE patients and provided guidance to physicians for rational utilization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1999, Arthritis Research and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed journal, publishing original articles in the area of musculoskeletal research and therapy as well as, reviews, commentaries and reports. A major focus of the journal is on the immunologic processes leading to inflammation, damage and repair as they relate to autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions, and which inform the translation of this knowledge into advances in clinical care. Original basic, translational and clinical research is considered for publication along with results of early and late phase therapeutic trials, especially as they pertain to the underpinning science that informs clinical observations in interventional studies.
期刊最新文献
Gout-associated SNP at the IL1RN-IL1F10 region is associated with altered cytokine production in PBMCs of patients with gout and controls Semaphorin 5A promotes Th17 differentiation via PI3K-Akt-mTOR in systemic lupus erythematosus Automatic knee osteoarthritis severity grading based on X-ray images using a hierarchical classification method. Correlation between circulating cell-free mitochondrial DNA content and severity of knee degeneration in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study. Therapeutic effects of extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells primed with disease-conditioned-immune cells in systemic lupus erythematosus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1