B. Allen, K. Murray, P. Ogwari, F. Suriamin, J. I. Walter, N. W. Hayman
{"title":"俄克拉荷马州中北部处置储层的压力监测:对地震和地质储藏的影响","authors":"B. Allen, K. Murray, P. Ogwari, F. Suriamin, J. I. Walter, N. W. Hayman","doi":"10.1029/2024JB029200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Disposal of industrial wastewater and activities such as <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mrow>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <mi>O</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{C}\\mathrm{O}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> underground sequestration depend upon pressure conditions within deep geologic reservoirs. Sometimes, injection and storage are associated with induced seismicity, suggested to result from reservoir compartmentalization, leakage into faults, or other mechanisms in the subsurface. To understand subsurface pressure conditions within a major regional disposal reservoir, the Arbuckle Group of Oklahoma, we monitored the water levels in 15 inactive injection wells. The wells were monitored at 30-s intervals, with eight wells monitored since September 2016, and an additional seven from July 2017. All the wells were monitored until early March 2020. Since 2016, hydraulic head decreased in 13 of the 15 wells, proportional to near-borehole fluid pressure even considering decreasing regional injection volumes during this period. The well pressures respond to three types of perturbations: (i) gravitational fluctuations (a.k.a. solid-earth tides) (ii) distal and proximal earthquakes, and (iii) injections into nearby wells. Parameterization of tidal responses illustrates that the near wellbore environments have negative fluid flux (i.e., are leaking). Earthquakes cause differing pressure responses from well to well, with some highly sensitive to proximal events, some to distal events, and some apparently insensitive. Injections have variable impacts in some cases masking tidal and earthquake pressure signals. Collectively, there appears to be a threshold injection rate above which well pressure becomes less sensitive to the volume of injections within 15 km. Multi-scale geological structure and temporal permeability changes are likely controlling the pressure field, indicating leakage of fluids across the system.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"129 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB029200","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pressure Monitoring of Disposal Reservoirs in North-Central Oklahoma: Implications for Seismicity and Geostorage\",\"authors\":\"B. Allen, K. Murray, P. Ogwari, F. Suriamin, J. I. Walter, N. W. Hayman\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JB029200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Disposal of industrial wastewater and activities such as <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>C</mi>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${\\\\mathrm{C}\\\\mathrm{O}}_{2}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> underground sequestration depend upon pressure conditions within deep geologic reservoirs. Sometimes, injection and storage are associated with induced seismicity, suggested to result from reservoir compartmentalization, leakage into faults, or other mechanisms in the subsurface. To understand subsurface pressure conditions within a major regional disposal reservoir, the Arbuckle Group of Oklahoma, we monitored the water levels in 15 inactive injection wells. The wells were monitored at 30-s intervals, with eight wells monitored since September 2016, and an additional seven from July 2017. All the wells were monitored until early March 2020. Since 2016, hydraulic head decreased in 13 of the 15 wells, proportional to near-borehole fluid pressure even considering decreasing regional injection volumes during this period. The well pressures respond to three types of perturbations: (i) gravitational fluctuations (a.k.a. solid-earth tides) (ii) distal and proximal earthquakes, and (iii) injections into nearby wells. Parameterization of tidal responses illustrates that the near wellbore environments have negative fluid flux (i.e., are leaking). Earthquakes cause differing pressure responses from well to well, with some highly sensitive to proximal events, some to distal events, and some apparently insensitive. Injections have variable impacts in some cases masking tidal and earthquake pressure signals. Collectively, there appears to be a threshold injection rate above which well pressure becomes less sensitive to the volume of injections within 15 km. Multi-scale geological structure and temporal permeability changes are likely controlling the pressure field, indicating leakage of fluids across the system.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"volume\":\"129 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB029200\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB029200\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB029200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pressure Monitoring of Disposal Reservoirs in North-Central Oklahoma: Implications for Seismicity and Geostorage
Disposal of industrial wastewater and activities such as underground sequestration depend upon pressure conditions within deep geologic reservoirs. Sometimes, injection and storage are associated with induced seismicity, suggested to result from reservoir compartmentalization, leakage into faults, or other mechanisms in the subsurface. To understand subsurface pressure conditions within a major regional disposal reservoir, the Arbuckle Group of Oklahoma, we monitored the water levels in 15 inactive injection wells. The wells were monitored at 30-s intervals, with eight wells monitored since September 2016, and an additional seven from July 2017. All the wells were monitored until early March 2020. Since 2016, hydraulic head decreased in 13 of the 15 wells, proportional to near-borehole fluid pressure even considering decreasing regional injection volumes during this period. The well pressures respond to three types of perturbations: (i) gravitational fluctuations (a.k.a. solid-earth tides) (ii) distal and proximal earthquakes, and (iii) injections into nearby wells. Parameterization of tidal responses illustrates that the near wellbore environments have negative fluid flux (i.e., are leaking). Earthquakes cause differing pressure responses from well to well, with some highly sensitive to proximal events, some to distal events, and some apparently insensitive. Injections have variable impacts in some cases masking tidal and earthquake pressure signals. Collectively, there appears to be a threshold injection rate above which well pressure becomes less sensitive to the volume of injections within 15 km. Multi-scale geological structure and temporal permeability changes are likely controlling the pressure field, indicating leakage of fluids across the system.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology.
JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields.
JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.