俄克拉荷马州中北部处置储层的压力监测:对地震和地质储藏的影响

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1029/2024JB029200
B. Allen, K. Murray, P. Ogwari, F. Suriamin, J. I. Walter, N. W. Hayman
{"title":"俄克拉荷马州中北部处置储层的压力监测:对地震和地质储藏的影响","authors":"B. Allen,&nbsp;K. Murray,&nbsp;P. Ogwari,&nbsp;F. Suriamin,&nbsp;J. I. Walter,&nbsp;N. W. Hayman","doi":"10.1029/2024JB029200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Disposal of industrial wastewater and activities such as <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mrow>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <mi>O</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{C}\\mathrm{O}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> underground sequestration depend upon pressure conditions within deep geologic reservoirs. Sometimes, injection and storage are associated with induced seismicity, suggested to result from reservoir compartmentalization, leakage into faults, or other mechanisms in the subsurface. To understand subsurface pressure conditions within a major regional disposal reservoir, the Arbuckle Group of Oklahoma, we monitored the water levels in 15 inactive injection wells. The wells were monitored at 30-s intervals, with eight wells monitored since September 2016, and an additional seven from July 2017. All the wells were monitored until early March 2020. Since 2016, hydraulic head decreased in 13 of the 15 wells, proportional to near-borehole fluid pressure even considering decreasing regional injection volumes during this period. The well pressures respond to three types of perturbations: (i) gravitational fluctuations (a.k.a. solid-earth tides) (ii) distal and proximal earthquakes, and (iii) injections into nearby wells. Parameterization of tidal responses illustrates that the near wellbore environments have negative fluid flux (i.e., are leaking). Earthquakes cause differing pressure responses from well to well, with some highly sensitive to proximal events, some to distal events, and some apparently insensitive. Injections have variable impacts in some cases masking tidal and earthquake pressure signals. Collectively, there appears to be a threshold injection rate above which well pressure becomes less sensitive to the volume of injections within 15 km. Multi-scale geological structure and temporal permeability changes are likely controlling the pressure field, indicating leakage of fluids across the system.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB029200","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pressure Monitoring of Disposal Reservoirs in North-Central Oklahoma: Implications for Seismicity and Geostorage\",\"authors\":\"B. Allen,&nbsp;K. Murray,&nbsp;P. Ogwari,&nbsp;F. Suriamin,&nbsp;J. I. Walter,&nbsp;N. W. Hayman\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JB029200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Disposal of industrial wastewater and activities such as <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>C</mi>\\n <mi>O</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${\\\\mathrm{C}\\\\mathrm{O}}_{2}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> underground sequestration depend upon pressure conditions within deep geologic reservoirs. Sometimes, injection and storage are associated with induced seismicity, suggested to result from reservoir compartmentalization, leakage into faults, or other mechanisms in the subsurface. To understand subsurface pressure conditions within a major regional disposal reservoir, the Arbuckle Group of Oklahoma, we monitored the water levels in 15 inactive injection wells. The wells were monitored at 30-s intervals, with eight wells monitored since September 2016, and an additional seven from July 2017. All the wells were monitored until early March 2020. Since 2016, hydraulic head decreased in 13 of the 15 wells, proportional to near-borehole fluid pressure even considering decreasing regional injection volumes during this period. The well pressures respond to three types of perturbations: (i) gravitational fluctuations (a.k.a. solid-earth tides) (ii) distal and proximal earthquakes, and (iii) injections into nearby wells. Parameterization of tidal responses illustrates that the near wellbore environments have negative fluid flux (i.e., are leaking). Earthquakes cause differing pressure responses from well to well, with some highly sensitive to proximal events, some to distal events, and some apparently insensitive. Injections have variable impacts in some cases masking tidal and earthquake pressure signals. Collectively, there appears to be a threshold injection rate above which well pressure becomes less sensitive to the volume of injections within 15 km. Multi-scale geological structure and temporal permeability changes are likely controlling the pressure field, indicating leakage of fluids across the system.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB029200\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB029200\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB029200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工业废水的处理和 CO2${mathrm{C}\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ 地下封存等活动取决于深层地质储层内的压力条件。有时,注入和封存与诱发地震有关,诱发地震的原因可能是储层分隔、渗漏到断层或地下的其他机制。为了了解俄克拉荷马州 Arbuckle 组这一主要区域性弃置储层的地下压力状况,我们对 15 口非活动注水井的水位进行了监测。这些井的监测间隔为 30 秒,其中 8 口井自 2016 年 9 月开始监测,另外 7 口井自 2017 年 7 月开始监测。对所有油井的监测一直持续到 2020 年 3 月初。自 2016 年以来,15 口井中有 13 口井的水力压头下降,与近井眼流体压力成正比,即使考虑到在此期间区域注入量减少。油井压力对三种扰动做出了反应:(i)重力波动(又称固体地球潮汐);(ii)远端和近端地震;(iii)附近油井的注水。潮汐响应的参数化表明,近井筒环境具有负流体通量(即泄漏)。地震造成的压力响应因井而异,有些井对近井事件高度敏感,有些对远井事件高度敏感,有些则明显不敏感。注水产生的影响各不相同,有些情况下会掩盖潮汐和地震压力信号。总之,似乎存在一个注入率阈值,超过该阈值,井压对 15 千米范围内注入量的敏感性就会降低。多尺度地质结构和时间渗透率变化可能控制着压力场,表明整个系统的流体泄漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pressure Monitoring of Disposal Reservoirs in North-Central Oklahoma: Implications for Seismicity and Geostorage

Disposal of industrial wastewater and activities such as C O 2 ${\mathrm{C}\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ underground sequestration depend upon pressure conditions within deep geologic reservoirs. Sometimes, injection and storage are associated with induced seismicity, suggested to result from reservoir compartmentalization, leakage into faults, or other mechanisms in the subsurface. To understand subsurface pressure conditions within a major regional disposal reservoir, the Arbuckle Group of Oklahoma, we monitored the water levels in 15 inactive injection wells. The wells were monitored at 30-s intervals, with eight wells monitored since September 2016, and an additional seven from July 2017. All the wells were monitored until early March 2020. Since 2016, hydraulic head decreased in 13 of the 15 wells, proportional to near-borehole fluid pressure even considering decreasing regional injection volumes during this period. The well pressures respond to three types of perturbations: (i) gravitational fluctuations (a.k.a. solid-earth tides) (ii) distal and proximal earthquakes, and (iii) injections into nearby wells. Parameterization of tidal responses illustrates that the near wellbore environments have negative fluid flux (i.e., are leaking). Earthquakes cause differing pressure responses from well to well, with some highly sensitive to proximal events, some to distal events, and some apparently insensitive. Injections have variable impacts in some cases masking tidal and earthquake pressure signals. Collectively, there appears to be a threshold injection rate above which well pressure becomes less sensitive to the volume of injections within 15 km. Multi-scale geological structure and temporal permeability changes are likely controlling the pressure field, indicating leakage of fluids across the system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
559
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology. JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields. JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Tectonic Implications of Early Permian Arc Rocks and Their Cretaceous to Early Cenozoic Reworking in Southern Lhasa Terrane, Tibet Ambient Noise Tomography of Northern Borneo Reveals Evidence of Subduction and Post-Subduction Processes Conformably Variable Geocentric Axial Dipole at ca. 2.1 Ga: Paleomagnetic Dispersion of the Indin Dyke Swarm, Slave Craton Implications of a Reverse Polarity Earthquake Pair on Fault Friction and Stress Heterogeneity Near Ridgecrest, California Rheological Structure and Stress Triggered Megathrust Slip Constrained From the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura Crustal Earthquake
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1