吲哚菁绿血管造影辅助纯半乳晕切口乳头分离乳房切除术和直接植入乳房重建术。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Aesthetic Surgery Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1093/asj/sjae218
Mi Kyung Lee, Jung-Min Kang, Woo Sung Lim, Jin-Woo Park, Kyong-Je Woo
{"title":"吲哚菁绿血管造影辅助纯半乳晕切口乳头分离乳房切除术和直接植入乳房重建术。","authors":"Mi Kyung Lee, Jung-Min Kang, Woo Sung Lim, Jin-Woo Park, Kyong-Je Woo","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although pure hemi-periareolar incisions for mastectomy can prevent visible scarring, nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis is a potential risk. Superficial-arterial inflow of the NAC can be evaluated by indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of ICG-A-assisted periareolar incision on NAC necrosis during nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2018 and November 2021, lateral hemi-periareolar incisions for NSM were routine. After that time, ICG-A-assisted hemi-periareolar incisions were performed between December 2021 and September 2023. The location of the main arterial inflow was evaluated during preoperative ICG-A and the periareolar incision was planned to avoid disruption. NAC necrosis in the ICG-A-assisted and blind-incision groups was compared by univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 202 breasts were analyzed, comprising 80 breasts from 75 patients in the ICG-A-assisted group and 122 breasts from 115 patients in the blind-incision group. On preoperative ICG-A, superficial-arterial inflow was observed in 67 of 80 (83.75%) breasts. Perfusion of the nipple without superficial-arterial inflow (base-perfusion pattern) was observed in 13 breasts (16.25%). The main arterial inflow was most common in the upper-medial direction at the areolar margins (65.67%). The full-thickness NAC necrosis rate in the ICG-A-assisted incision group was significantly lower than that in the blind-incision group (2.5% vs 13.1%, P = .010). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ICG-A-assisted incisions significantly reduced the risk of NAC necrosis (odds ratio, 0.155; P = .030).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICG-A-assisted pure hemi-periareolar incisions reduced NAC necrosis in DTI breast reconstructions.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3 (therapeutic): </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"156-162"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indocyanine Green Angiography-Assisted Pure Hemi-periareolar Incision Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Mi Kyung Lee, Jung-Min Kang, Woo Sung Lim, Jin-Woo Park, Kyong-Je Woo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjae218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although pure hemi-periareolar incisions for mastectomy can prevent visible scarring, nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis is a potential risk. Superficial-arterial inflow of the NAC can be evaluated by indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of ICG-A-assisted periareolar incision on NAC necrosis during nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between December 2018 and November 2021, lateral hemi-periareolar incisions for NSM were routine. After that time, ICG-A-assisted hemi-periareolar incisions were performed between December 2021 and September 2023. The location of the main arterial inflow was evaluated during preoperative ICG-A and the periareolar incision was planned to avoid disruption. NAC necrosis in the ICG-A-assisted and blind-incision groups was compared by univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 202 breasts were analyzed, comprising 80 breasts from 75 patients in the ICG-A-assisted group and 122 breasts from 115 patients in the blind-incision group. On preoperative ICG-A, superficial-arterial inflow was observed in 67 of 80 (83.75%) breasts. Perfusion of the nipple without superficial-arterial inflow (base-perfusion pattern) was observed in 13 breasts (16.25%). The main arterial inflow was most common in the upper-medial direction at the areolar margins (65.67%). The full-thickness NAC necrosis rate in the ICG-A-assisted incision group was significantly lower than that in the blind-incision group (2.5% vs 13.1%, P = .010). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ICG-A-assisted incisions significantly reduced the risk of NAC necrosis (odds ratio, 0.155; P = .030).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICG-A-assisted pure hemi-periareolar incisions reduced NAC necrosis in DTI breast reconstructions.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3 (therapeutic): </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"156-162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae218\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae218","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管乳房切除术的纯半乳晕切口可避免出现明显瘢痕,但乳头乳晕复合体(NAC)坏死是一个潜在风险。吲哚青绿血管造影(ICG-A)可评估乳头乳晕复合体的浅层动脉流入情况:本研究评估了 ICG-A 辅助乳晕周围切口对乳头保留乳房切除术(NSM)和直接植入(DTI)乳房重建过程中 NAC 坏死的影响:2018年12月至2021年11月期间,NSM的外侧半乳晕切口为常规切口。之后,在 2021 年 12 月至 2023 年 9 月期间进行 ICG-A 辅助半乳晕切口。术前 ICG-A 期间对主要动脉流入的位置进行了评估,并规划了乳晕周围切口以避免中断。通过单变量和多变量分析比较了ICG-A辅助组和盲切组的NAC坏死情况:共分析了 202 例乳房,其中包括 ICG-A 辅助组 75 例患者的 80 例乳房和盲切组 115 例患者的 122 例乳房。在术前 ICG-A 检查中,80 例乳房中有 67 例(83.75%)观察到浅动脉流入。在 13 个乳房(16.25%)中观察到乳头灌注,但无浅层动脉流入(基底灌注模式)。主要动脉流入最常见于乳晕边缘的中上方向(65.67%)。ICG-A 辅助切口组的全厚 NAC 坏死率明显低于盲切口组(2.5% 对 13.1%,P = 0.010)。多变量分析表明,ICG-A辅助切口明显降低了NAC坏死的风险(几率为0.155,P = 0.030):结论:ICG-A辅助的纯半乳晕切口可减少DTI乳房重建中的NAC坏死。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Indocyanine Green Angiography-Assisted Pure Hemi-periareolar Incision Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.

Background: Although pure hemi-periareolar incisions for mastectomy can prevent visible scarring, nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis is a potential risk. Superficial-arterial inflow of the NAC can be evaluated by indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A).

Objectives: This study evaluated the impact of ICG-A-assisted periareolar incision on NAC necrosis during nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction.

Methods: Between December 2018 and November 2021, lateral hemi-periareolar incisions for NSM were routine. After that time, ICG-A-assisted hemi-periareolar incisions were performed between December 2021 and September 2023. The location of the main arterial inflow was evaluated during preoperative ICG-A and the periareolar incision was planned to avoid disruption. NAC necrosis in the ICG-A-assisted and blind-incision groups was compared by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: A total of 202 breasts were analyzed, comprising 80 breasts from 75 patients in the ICG-A-assisted group and 122 breasts from 115 patients in the blind-incision group. On preoperative ICG-A, superficial-arterial inflow was observed in 67 of 80 (83.75%) breasts. Perfusion of the nipple without superficial-arterial inflow (base-perfusion pattern) was observed in 13 breasts (16.25%). The main arterial inflow was most common in the upper-medial direction at the areolar margins (65.67%). The full-thickness NAC necrosis rate in the ICG-A-assisted incision group was significantly lower than that in the blind-incision group (2.5% vs 13.1%, P = .010). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ICG-A-assisted incisions significantly reduced the risk of NAC necrosis (odds ratio, 0.155; P = .030).

Conclusions: ICG-A-assisted pure hemi-periareolar incisions reduced NAC necrosis in DTI breast reconstructions.

Level of evidence: 3 (therapeutic):

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
期刊最新文献
Effective Recontouring of the Neck Using Complete Platysmal Transection. Enhancement of Fat Septa: Polycaprolactone (PCL) Microspheres Boost Collagen Production in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue. Patient Factors That Impact FACE-Q Aesthetics Outcomes: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Regression Analysis. Evaluating the Role of Gynecomastia Surgery in Improving Sexual Function and Hormonal Profiles. The Cosmetic Surgery in Adolescents: Psychological, Social, and Medico-Legal Responsibilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1