Se Ik Kim, Ji Hyun Kim, Eun Young Park, Eun Taeg Kim, Eunjin Choi, Jae-Weon Kim, Sang-Yoon Park, Myong Cheol Lim
{"title":"新诊断的晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者早期和晚期开始尼拉帕利维持治疗的生存结果和安全性比较。","authors":"Se Ik Kim, Ji Hyun Kim, Eun Young Park, Eun Taeg Kim, Eunjin Choi, Jae-Weon Kim, Sang-Yoon Park, Myong Cheol Lim","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2024-006111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to compare survival outcomes and adverse events between early and late initiation of niraparib maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer who showed a complete or partial response to frontline platinum-based chemotherapy and received niraparib maintenance therapy between October 2019 and December 2022. The primary endpoint was the HR for progression-free survival based on the median initiation interval, which was defined as the duration between the completion of chemotherapy and commencement of maintenance therapy. The secondary endpoint was the comparison of progression-free survival at another time point that determined the interval that maximized the difference between the survival curves of the two groups using the Contal and O'Quigley method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis included 146 patients who received niraparib maintenance therapy. The median age was 58 years (IQR 50-63.3). The median initiation interval was 8.4 (IQR 5.7-8.9) weeks. After adjusting for prognostic factors for progression-free survival identified through multivariable analysis, early initiation (≤8 weeks) of niraparib was associated with significantly better progression-free survival (HR=0.57; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.99; p=0.047). Furthermore, the initiation interval that maximized the difference in progression-free survival was 6 weeks. Multivariable analysis revealed that early initiation (≤6 weeks) of niraparib significantly increased progression-free survival (HR=0.37; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.76; p=0.007). The rate of treatment discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events was higher (12.5% versus. 2.8%; p=0.036) in patients receiving niraparib within 6 weeks than those treated later, with no significant effect in those initiating treatment within 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early initiation of niraparib maintenance therapy within 8 weeks of chemotherapy completion improved progression-free survival, with further benefits observed with treatment within 6 weeks in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of survival outcomes and safety between early and late initiation of niraparib maintenance in newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Se Ik Kim, Ji Hyun Kim, Eun Young Park, Eun Taeg Kim, Eunjin Choi, Jae-Weon Kim, Sang-Yoon Park, Myong Cheol Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ijgc-2024-006111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to compare survival outcomes and adverse events between early and late initiation of niraparib maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer who showed a complete or partial response to frontline platinum-based chemotherapy and received niraparib maintenance therapy between October 2019 and December 2022. The primary endpoint was the HR for progression-free survival based on the median initiation interval, which was defined as the duration between the completion of chemotherapy and commencement of maintenance therapy. The secondary endpoint was the comparison of progression-free survival at another time point that determined the interval that maximized the difference between the survival curves of the two groups using the Contal and O'Quigley method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis included 146 patients who received niraparib maintenance therapy. The median age was 58 years (IQR 50-63.3). The median initiation interval was 8.4 (IQR 5.7-8.9) weeks. After adjusting for prognostic factors for progression-free survival identified through multivariable analysis, early initiation (≤8 weeks) of niraparib was associated with significantly better progression-free survival (HR=0.57; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.99; p=0.047). Furthermore, the initiation interval that maximized the difference in progression-free survival was 6 weeks. Multivariable analysis revealed that early initiation (≤6 weeks) of niraparib significantly increased progression-free survival (HR=0.37; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.76; p=0.007). The rate of treatment discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events was higher (12.5% versus. 2.8%; p=0.036) in patients receiving niraparib within 6 weeks than those treated later, with no significant effect in those initiating treatment within 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early initiation of niraparib maintenance therapy within 8 weeks of chemotherapy completion improved progression-free survival, with further benefits observed with treatment within 6 weeks in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-006111\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-006111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的这项多中心回顾性队列研究旨在比较新诊断晚期卵巢癌患者早期和晚期开始尼拉帕尼维持治疗的生存结果和不良事件:我们纳入了2019年10月至2022年12月期间对一线铂类化疗完全或部分应答并接受尼拉帕尼维持治疗的III-IV期卵巢癌患者。主要终点是基于中位起始间隔的无进展生存率,中位起始间隔定义为化疗结束到开始维持治疗之间的持续时间。次要终点是比较另一个时间点的无进展生存期,采用康塔尔和奥奎格利法确定两组生存曲线差异最大的时间间隔:本分析包括146名接受尼拉帕利维持治疗的患者。中位年龄为 58 岁(IQR 50-63.3)。中位起始间隔为 8.4 周(IQR 5.7-8.9 周)。在对多变量分析确定的无进展生存期预后因素进行调整后,尼拉帕利的早期启动(≤8周)与明显更好的无进展生存期相关(HR=0.57;95% CI 0.33至0.99;P=0.047)。此外,使无进展生存期差异最大化的起始间隔为 6 周。多变量分析显示,早期开始尼拉帕利(≤6周)可显著提高无进展生存期(HR=0.37;95% CI 0.18至0.76;P=0.007)。在6周内接受尼拉帕尼治疗的患者因治疗突发不良事件而中断治疗的比例(12.5%对2.8%;P=0.036)高于在6周后接受治疗的患者,而在8周内开始治疗的患者则无明显影响:结论:在化疗结束后8周内尽早开始尼拉帕尼维持治疗可改善新诊断晚期卵巢癌患者的无进展生存期,在6周内开始治疗可进一步改善患者的无进展生存期。
Comparison of survival outcomes and safety between early and late initiation of niraparib maintenance in newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
Objective: This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to compare survival outcomes and adverse events between early and late initiation of niraparib maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.
Methods: We included patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer who showed a complete or partial response to frontline platinum-based chemotherapy and received niraparib maintenance therapy between October 2019 and December 2022. The primary endpoint was the HR for progression-free survival based on the median initiation interval, which was defined as the duration between the completion of chemotherapy and commencement of maintenance therapy. The secondary endpoint was the comparison of progression-free survival at another time point that determined the interval that maximized the difference between the survival curves of the two groups using the Contal and O'Quigley method.
Results: This analysis included 146 patients who received niraparib maintenance therapy. The median age was 58 years (IQR 50-63.3). The median initiation interval was 8.4 (IQR 5.7-8.9) weeks. After adjusting for prognostic factors for progression-free survival identified through multivariable analysis, early initiation (≤8 weeks) of niraparib was associated with significantly better progression-free survival (HR=0.57; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.99; p=0.047). Furthermore, the initiation interval that maximized the difference in progression-free survival was 6 weeks. Multivariable analysis revealed that early initiation (≤6 weeks) of niraparib significantly increased progression-free survival (HR=0.37; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.76; p=0.007). The rate of treatment discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events was higher (12.5% versus. 2.8%; p=0.036) in patients receiving niraparib within 6 weeks than those treated later, with no significant effect in those initiating treatment within 8 weeks.
Conclusion: Early initiation of niraparib maintenance therapy within 8 weeks of chemotherapy completion improved progression-free survival, with further benefits observed with treatment within 6 weeks in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.