肌肤接触对足月新生儿父母心理健康的影响:随机临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.065
Liz Mendoza-Aucaruri, Jean Pierre López-Mesia, Luis Ttito-Paricahua, Marlene Magallanes-Corimanya, Evelyn M Asencios-Falcón, Alicia Lopez-Gomero, Daniel Fernandez-Guzman, Alvaro Taype-Rondan
{"title":"肌肤接触对足月新生儿父母心理健康的影响:随机临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Liz Mendoza-Aucaruri, Jean Pierre López-Mesia, Luis Ttito-Paricahua, Marlene Magallanes-Corimanya, Evelyn M Asencios-Falcón, Alicia Lopez-Gomero, Daniel Fernandez-Guzman, Alvaro Taype-Rondan","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The postpartum period can be emotionally challenging for parents, with documented levels of anxiety, stress, and depression. While the benefits of skin-to-skin contact (SSC) are well-known, its impact on the mental health of parents of full-term newborns has been less studied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the effects of SSC in mental health outcomes in the parents of full-term newborns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review, a comprehensive search was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing SSC versus no SSC and assessing mental health outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed whenever possible, and the GRADE approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 9 RCTs with 1201 participants. Regarding the risk of bias, the most affected domains were selective reporting, blinding, and allocation concealment. Regarding parental anxiety, SSC may reduce it at short-term, while it is unsure its effect at mid-term and it may not have any effect at long-term. Regarding Psychological stress, SSC may not have an impact at mid- and long-term. Regarding delivery-related post-traumatic stress symptoms, SSC may not have an impact at short-, mid-, and long-term. Regarding depressive symptoms, the evidence is uncertain at short- and mid-term.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>For the assessed outcomes, certainty of the evidence was low or very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SSC may reduce parental anxiety at short-term, while it may not have an impact in psychological stress and delivery-related post-traumatic stress symptoms. Moreover, the evidence is uncertain regarding its effect in long-term anxiety and depressive symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1090-1098"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of skin-to-skin contact on mental health outcomes in the parents of full-term newborns: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Liz Mendoza-Aucaruri, Jean Pierre López-Mesia, Luis Ttito-Paricahua, Marlene Magallanes-Corimanya, Evelyn M Asencios-Falcón, Alicia Lopez-Gomero, Daniel Fernandez-Guzman, Alvaro Taype-Rondan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The postpartum period can be emotionally challenging for parents, with documented levels of anxiety, stress, and depression. While the benefits of skin-to-skin contact (SSC) are well-known, its impact on the mental health of parents of full-term newborns has been less studied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the effects of SSC in mental health outcomes in the parents of full-term newborns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review, a comprehensive search was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing SSC versus no SSC and assessing mental health outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed whenever possible, and the GRADE approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 9 RCTs with 1201 participants. Regarding the risk of bias, the most affected domains were selective reporting, blinding, and allocation concealment. Regarding parental anxiety, SSC may reduce it at short-term, while it is unsure its effect at mid-term and it may not have any effect at long-term. Regarding Psychological stress, SSC may not have an impact at mid- and long-term. Regarding delivery-related post-traumatic stress symptoms, SSC may not have an impact at short-, mid-, and long-term. Regarding depressive symptoms, the evidence is uncertain at short- and mid-term.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>For the assessed outcomes, certainty of the evidence was low or very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SSC may reduce parental anxiety at short-term, while it may not have an impact in psychological stress and delivery-related post-traumatic stress symptoms. Moreover, the evidence is uncertain regarding its effect in long-term anxiety and depressive symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1090-1098\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.065\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:产后时期对父母的情绪是一种挑战,有记录表明会出现焦虑、压力和抑郁。虽然皮肤接触(SSC)的好处众所周知,但其对足月新生儿父母心理健康的影响却鲜有研究:我们旨在评估 SSC 对足月儿父母心理健康的影响:在这篇系统性综述中,我们进行了一次全面的检索,以确定比较了SSC和无SSC并评估了心理健康结果的随机临床试验(RCT)。在可能的情况下进行元分析,并采用 GRADE 方法对证据的确定性进行评级:我们纳入了 9 项 RCT,共有 1201 名参与者。关于偏倚风险,受影响最大的领域是选择性报告、盲法和分配隐藏。在父母焦虑方面,短期内可减轻父母焦虑,但中期效果不确定,长期可能没有任何效果。在心理压力方面,SSC 可能对中期和长期没有影响。关于与分娩有关的创伤后应激症状,短期、中期和长期服用 SSC 可能没有影响。在抑郁症状方面,短期和中期的证据尚不确定:对于评估的结果,证据的确定性较低或非常低:SSC可在短期内减轻父母的焦虑,但对心理压力和分娩相关的创伤后应激症状可能没有影响。此外,关于其对长期焦虑和抑郁症状的影响,证据尚不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of skin-to-skin contact on mental health outcomes in the parents of full-term newborns: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Background: The postpartum period can be emotionally challenging for parents, with documented levels of anxiety, stress, and depression. While the benefits of skin-to-skin contact (SSC) are well-known, its impact on the mental health of parents of full-term newborns has been less studied.

Objective: We aimed to assess the effects of SSC in mental health outcomes in the parents of full-term newborns.

Methods: In this systematic review, a comprehensive search was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing SSC versus no SSC and assessing mental health outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed whenever possible, and the GRADE approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence.

Results: We included 9 RCTs with 1201 participants. Regarding the risk of bias, the most affected domains were selective reporting, blinding, and allocation concealment. Regarding parental anxiety, SSC may reduce it at short-term, while it is unsure its effect at mid-term and it may not have any effect at long-term. Regarding Psychological stress, SSC may not have an impact at mid- and long-term. Regarding delivery-related post-traumatic stress symptoms, SSC may not have an impact at short-, mid-, and long-term. Regarding depressive symptoms, the evidence is uncertain at short- and mid-term.

Limitations: For the assessed outcomes, certainty of the evidence was low or very low.

Conclusion: SSC may reduce parental anxiety at short-term, while it may not have an impact in psychological stress and delivery-related post-traumatic stress symptoms. Moreover, the evidence is uncertain regarding its effect in long-term anxiety and depressive symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
期刊最新文献
The D*Phase-study: Comparing short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and cognitive behavioural therapy for major depressive disorder in a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Symptoms of depression, but not PTSD, influence cognitive performance in healthy Army National Guard Soldiers. Is self-disgust an implicit or explicit emotional schema? Accumulation of perceived discrimination over time and likelihood of probable mental health problems in UK adults: A longitudinal cohort study. Effects of subanesthetic repeated esketamine infusions on memory function and NGF in patients with depression: An open-label study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1