剖腹产瘢痕缺损形成的风险因素和手术技术的影响:文献系统回顾。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102870
Clémentine Bernard , Aubert Agostini , Florence Bretelle , Julie Blanc , Antoine Netter
{"title":"剖腹产瘢痕缺损形成的风险因素和手术技术的影响:文献系统回顾。","authors":"Clémentine Bernard ,&nbsp;Aubert Agostini ,&nbsp;Florence Bretelle ,&nbsp;Julie Blanc ,&nbsp;Antoine Netter","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the factors associated with an increased risk of cesarean scar defect formation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was performed up to July 2022 in PubMed databases following the PRISMA recommendations. All available English-language clinical studies presenting one or more factors that may affect the risk of cesarean scar defect were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>39 studies meeting the selection criteria were identified. An association was found between the number of previous cesarean sections and a significant increase in the risk of cesarean scar defect formation. Regarding patient age, gestational age at cesarean section, birth weight and emergency context did not appear to influence the risk of cesarean scar defect. However, cesarean sections performed during labor advanced stages of labor, may increase the risk. The data remain too limited to conclude on the impact of BMI, flexion uterine, and pregnancy pathologies (gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, premature rupture of membranes), the use of oxytocic, or infectious and hemorrhagic complications. Regarding the surgical technique, the literature suggested that a lower hysterotomy is associated with an increased risk of scar defect. However, the single- or double-layer suture technique did not provide a change in risk, and the data were too limited to conclude on the impact of the type of thread or suture used.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The present systematic review of the literature suggests that several factors may increase the risk of developing a cesarean scar defect, such as the number of previous cesarean sections, a cesarean section performed during advanced labor, and a lower hysterotomy. However, the current state of the literature does not allow definitive conclusions to be drawn on most other factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"54 1","pages":"Article 102870"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors and influence of surgical technique on the risk of caesarean scar defect formation: A systematic review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"Clémentine Bernard ,&nbsp;Aubert Agostini ,&nbsp;Florence Bretelle ,&nbsp;Julie Blanc ,&nbsp;Antoine Netter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the factors associated with an increased risk of cesarean scar defect formation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was performed up to July 2022 in PubMed databases following the PRISMA recommendations. All available English-language clinical studies presenting one or more factors that may affect the risk of cesarean scar defect were included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>39 studies meeting the selection criteria were identified. An association was found between the number of previous cesarean sections and a significant increase in the risk of cesarean scar defect formation. Regarding patient age, gestational age at cesarean section, birth weight and emergency context did not appear to influence the risk of cesarean scar defect. However, cesarean sections performed during labor advanced stages of labor, may increase the risk. The data remain too limited to conclude on the impact of BMI, flexion uterine, and pregnancy pathologies (gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, premature rupture of membranes), the use of oxytocic, or infectious and hemorrhagic complications. Regarding the surgical technique, the literature suggested that a lower hysterotomy is associated with an increased risk of scar defect. However, the single- or double-layer suture technique did not provide a change in risk, and the data were too limited to conclude on the impact of the type of thread or suture used.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The present systematic review of the literature suggests that several factors may increase the risk of developing a cesarean scar defect, such as the number of previous cesarean sections, a cesarean section performed during advanced labor, and a lower hysterotomy. However, the current state of the literature does not allow definitive conclusions to be drawn on most other factors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 102870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724001491\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724001491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定与剖宫产瘢痕缺损形成风险增加有关的因素:确定与剖宫产瘢痕缺损形成风险增加相关的因素:按照 PRISMA 建议,在 PubMed 数据库中对截至 2022 年 7 月的文献进行了系统检索。结果:共筛选出 39 项符合筛选标准的研究:结果:共发现 39 项符合筛选标准的研究。结果:39 项研究符合筛选标准。研究发现,既往剖宫产次数与剖宫产瘢痕缺损形成风险显著增加之间存在关联。患者年龄、剖宫产时的胎龄、出生体重和紧急状况似乎并不影响剖宫产瘢痕缺损的风险。然而,在分娩晚期进行剖宫产可能会增加风险。关于体重指数、子宫屈度、妊娠病理(妊娠糖尿病、子痫前期、胎膜早破)、催产药的使用或感染性和出血性并发症的影响,数据仍然太有限,无法得出结论。关于手术技巧,文献表明,子宫下段切除术与疤痕缺损风险增加有关。然而,单层或双层缝合技术并没有改变风险,而且数据过于有限,无法就所用线或缝合线类型的影响得出结论:本文献的系统回顾表明,有几个因素可能会增加剖宫产瘢痕缺损的风险,如既往剖宫产次数、高龄产妇剖宫产以及子宫下段切开术。然而,根据目前的文献资料,还无法对其他大多数因素得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors and influence of surgical technique on the risk of caesarean scar defect formation: A systematic review of the literature

Objective

To determine the factors associated with an increased risk of cesarean scar defect formation.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed up to July 2022 in PubMed databases following the PRISMA recommendations. All available English-language clinical studies presenting one or more factors that may affect the risk of cesarean scar defect were included.

Results

39 studies meeting the selection criteria were identified. An association was found between the number of previous cesarean sections and a significant increase in the risk of cesarean scar defect formation. Regarding patient age, gestational age at cesarean section, birth weight and emergency context did not appear to influence the risk of cesarean scar defect. However, cesarean sections performed during labor advanced stages of labor, may increase the risk. The data remain too limited to conclude on the impact of BMI, flexion uterine, and pregnancy pathologies (gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, premature rupture of membranes), the use of oxytocic, or infectious and hemorrhagic complications. Regarding the surgical technique, the literature suggested that a lower hysterotomy is associated with an increased risk of scar defect. However, the single- or double-layer suture technique did not provide a change in risk, and the data were too limited to conclude on the impact of the type of thread or suture used.

Conclusion

The present systematic review of the literature suggests that several factors may increase the risk of developing a cesarean scar defect, such as the number of previous cesarean sections, a cesarean section performed during advanced labor, and a lower hysterotomy. However, the current state of the literature does not allow definitive conclusions to be drawn on most other factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents New reference charts for fetal ultrasound corpus callosum length with emphasis on the third trimester High-risk patient profiles for ovarian cancer: A new approach using cluster analysis of tumor markers Partners experiences of caesarean deliveries in the operating room
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1