Delbert G. Robinson , Majnu John , Alexander L. Miller , Nina R. Schooler , John M. Kane
{"title":"用于评估初发精神病患者的 COMPASS 量表。","authors":"Delbert G. Robinson , Majnu John , Alexander L. Miller , Nina R. Schooler , John M. Kane","doi":"10.1016/j.schres.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Psychosis symptom assessment instruments are rarely used in US mental health community clinical practice despite the advantages of measurement-based care. Barriers include the length of typical scales and that data for scale evaluation often come from researcher and not clinician raters.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>The 12-item COMPASS symptom assessment was designed for the RAISE-ETP study of early phase psychosis. Ratings were done by community facility clinicians. COMPASS psychometric properties were examined with a Mokken scale analysis. Subsequently, Mokken analyses were done on 10-item COMPASS data from the ESPRITO learning health system.</div></div><div><h3>Study results</h3><div>3600 RAISE-ETP COMPASS assessments were examined. The COMPASS 12-item version fulfilled Mokken scale criteria for unidimensionality (H = 0.329 (SE:0.007)) as did a derived reduced 10-item version (H = 0.359 (SE:0.007)) and 5-item version (H = 0.396 (SE = 0.009)). The 12-item version showed one significant monotonicity violation; no significant violations were found in the reduced item versions. Of the reduced item versions, clinicians preferred the 10-item over the 5-item version. In the ESPRITO data, both the 10-item and 5-item versions met unidimensionality criteria (H = 0.458 (SE:0.030) and 0.478 (0.034) respectively) with no monotonicity violations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The COMPASS scale offers clinicians versions with varying lengths for assessment of individuals with first episode psychotic disorders in community settings. COMPASS can also facilitate data collection for large scale initiatives; the 10-item version is a symptom assessment option in the US national EPINET project.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21417,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research","volume":"274 ","pages":"Pages 307-314"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The COMPASS scale for the assessment of individuals with first episode psychotic disorders\",\"authors\":\"Delbert G. Robinson , Majnu John , Alexander L. Miller , Nina R. Schooler , John M. Kane\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.schres.2024.10.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Psychosis symptom assessment instruments are rarely used in US mental health community clinical practice despite the advantages of measurement-based care. Barriers include the length of typical scales and that data for scale evaluation often come from researcher and not clinician raters.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>The 12-item COMPASS symptom assessment was designed for the RAISE-ETP study of early phase psychosis. Ratings were done by community facility clinicians. COMPASS psychometric properties were examined with a Mokken scale analysis. Subsequently, Mokken analyses were done on 10-item COMPASS data from the ESPRITO learning health system.</div></div><div><h3>Study results</h3><div>3600 RAISE-ETP COMPASS assessments were examined. The COMPASS 12-item version fulfilled Mokken scale criteria for unidimensionality (H = 0.329 (SE:0.007)) as did a derived reduced 10-item version (H = 0.359 (SE:0.007)) and 5-item version (H = 0.396 (SE = 0.009)). The 12-item version showed one significant monotonicity violation; no significant violations were found in the reduced item versions. Of the reduced item versions, clinicians preferred the 10-item over the 5-item version. In the ESPRITO data, both the 10-item and 5-item versions met unidimensionality criteria (H = 0.458 (SE:0.030) and 0.478 (0.034) respectively) with no monotonicity violations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The COMPASS scale offers clinicians versions with varying lengths for assessment of individuals with first episode psychotic disorders in community settings. COMPASS can also facilitate data collection for large scale initiatives; the 10-item version is a symptom assessment option in the US national EPINET project.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia Research\",\"volume\":\"274 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 307-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996424004511\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920996424004511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The COMPASS scale for the assessment of individuals with first episode psychotic disorders
Background
Psychosis symptom assessment instruments are rarely used in US mental health community clinical practice despite the advantages of measurement-based care. Barriers include the length of typical scales and that data for scale evaluation often come from researcher and not clinician raters.
Study design
The 12-item COMPASS symptom assessment was designed for the RAISE-ETP study of early phase psychosis. Ratings were done by community facility clinicians. COMPASS psychometric properties were examined with a Mokken scale analysis. Subsequently, Mokken analyses were done on 10-item COMPASS data from the ESPRITO learning health system.
Study results
3600 RAISE-ETP COMPASS assessments were examined. The COMPASS 12-item version fulfilled Mokken scale criteria for unidimensionality (H = 0.329 (SE:0.007)) as did a derived reduced 10-item version (H = 0.359 (SE:0.007)) and 5-item version (H = 0.396 (SE = 0.009)). The 12-item version showed one significant monotonicity violation; no significant violations were found in the reduced item versions. Of the reduced item versions, clinicians preferred the 10-item over the 5-item version. In the ESPRITO data, both the 10-item and 5-item versions met unidimensionality criteria (H = 0.458 (SE:0.030) and 0.478 (0.034) respectively) with no monotonicity violations.
Conclusions
The COMPASS scale offers clinicians versions with varying lengths for assessment of individuals with first episode psychotic disorders in community settings. COMPASS can also facilitate data collection for large scale initiatives; the 10-item version is a symptom assessment option in the US national EPINET project.
期刊介绍:
As official journal of the Schizophrenia International Research Society (SIRS) Schizophrenia Research is THE journal of choice for international researchers and clinicians to share their work with the global schizophrenia research community. More than 6000 institutes have online or print (or both) access to this journal - the largest specialist journal in the field, with the largest readership!
Schizophrenia Research''s time to first decision is as fast as 6 weeks and its publishing speed is as fast as 4 weeks until online publication (corrected proof/Article in Press) after acceptance and 14 weeks from acceptance until publication in a printed issue.
The journal publishes novel papers that really contribute to understanding the biology and treatment of schizophrenic disorders; Schizophrenia Research brings together biological, clinical and psychological research in order to stimulate the synthesis of findings from all disciplines involved in improving patient outcomes in schizophrenia.