{"title":"接受自动红细胞交换治疗的镰状细胞病患者的生活质量。","authors":"Koenraad Dierick, Beatriz Rodriguez-Grande, Ariadna-Gador Navarro-Aragall, Mickael Beraud","doi":"10.1111/vox.13757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This review aims to explore the impact of sickle cell disease (SCD) on patients' quality of life (QoL) and the effectiveness of different transfusion modalities, particularly automated red blood cell exchange (aRBCX), in managing the factors that impact QoL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in PubMed to retrieve articles with data on QoL in SCD patients treated with aRBCX during the last 20 years. A targeted search for medical guidelines and a free search were added.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When assessing the impact of the transfusion modality on the QoL of patients with SCD, some studies indicated an improvement in health-related QoL when using aRBCX while others reported no differences. The benefits of aRBCX include a decrease in length of hospital stay, pain-related hospitalizations and procedure time. The drawbacks of aRBCX were also identified, including an increased number of procedure-related complications (despite the overall number of complications showing no significant differences) and a more complex vascular access. Chronic red blood cell exchange favours psychosocial factors such as anxiety and social functioning, but the impact of using aRBCX in these parameters is not determined yet.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>aRBCX, known to be an efficient procedure to manage SCD, appears to be promising in improving patients' QoL. However, more comprehensive studies incorporating patient-reported outcomes are needed to fully understand the impact of different transfusion modalities on QoL in SCD patients. An integrated care approach, including psychological support and pain management, may further enhance QoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":23631,"journal":{"name":"Vox Sanguinis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life in people with sickle cell disease treated with automated red blood cell exchange.\",\"authors\":\"Koenraad Dierick, Beatriz Rodriguez-Grande, Ariadna-Gador Navarro-Aragall, Mickael Beraud\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vox.13757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This review aims to explore the impact of sickle cell disease (SCD) on patients' quality of life (QoL) and the effectiveness of different transfusion modalities, particularly automated red blood cell exchange (aRBCX), in managing the factors that impact QoL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in PubMed to retrieve articles with data on QoL in SCD patients treated with aRBCX during the last 20 years. A targeted search for medical guidelines and a free search were added.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When assessing the impact of the transfusion modality on the QoL of patients with SCD, some studies indicated an improvement in health-related QoL when using aRBCX while others reported no differences. The benefits of aRBCX include a decrease in length of hospital stay, pain-related hospitalizations and procedure time. The drawbacks of aRBCX were also identified, including an increased number of procedure-related complications (despite the overall number of complications showing no significant differences) and a more complex vascular access. Chronic red blood cell exchange favours psychosocial factors such as anxiety and social functioning, but the impact of using aRBCX in these parameters is not determined yet.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>aRBCX, known to be an efficient procedure to manage SCD, appears to be promising in improving patients' QoL. However, more comprehensive studies incorporating patient-reported outcomes are needed to fully understand the impact of different transfusion modalities on QoL in SCD patients. An integrated care approach, including psychological support and pain management, may further enhance QoL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vox Sanguinis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vox Sanguinis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13757\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Sanguinis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13757","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:本综述旨在探讨镰状细胞病(SCD)对患者生活质量(QoL)的影响,以及不同输血方式(尤其是自动红细胞置换术(aRBCX))在控制影响 QoL 的因素方面的有效性:在 PubMed 上进行了系统搜索,以检索过去 20 年中有关接受自动红细胞交换治疗的 SCD 患者 QoL 数据的文章。结果:在评估输血对SCD患者QoL的影响时,我们发现,输血对SCD患者的QoL并没有影响:结果:在评估输血方式对 SCD 患者 QoL 的影响时,一些研究表明使用 aRBCX 可以改善患者的健康相关 QoL,而另一些研究则称两者之间没有差异。aRBCX 的优点包括缩短住院时间、减少与疼痛相关的住院和手术时间。同时也发现了 aRBCX 的缺点,包括与手术相关的并发症数量增加(尽管并发症总数没有明显差异)以及血管通路更加复杂。慢性红细胞交换有利于焦虑和社会功能等社会心理因素,但使用 aRBCX 对这些参数的影响尚未确定。然而,要充分了解不同输血方式对 SCD 患者 QoL 的影响,还需要进行更全面的研究,并纳入患者报告的结果。包括心理支持和疼痛管理在内的综合护理方法可进一步提高患者的生活质量。
Quality of life in people with sickle cell disease treated with automated red blood cell exchange.
Background and objectives: This review aims to explore the impact of sickle cell disease (SCD) on patients' quality of life (QoL) and the effectiveness of different transfusion modalities, particularly automated red blood cell exchange (aRBCX), in managing the factors that impact QoL.
Materials and methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed to retrieve articles with data on QoL in SCD patients treated with aRBCX during the last 20 years. A targeted search for medical guidelines and a free search were added.
Results: When assessing the impact of the transfusion modality on the QoL of patients with SCD, some studies indicated an improvement in health-related QoL when using aRBCX while others reported no differences. The benefits of aRBCX include a decrease in length of hospital stay, pain-related hospitalizations and procedure time. The drawbacks of aRBCX were also identified, including an increased number of procedure-related complications (despite the overall number of complications showing no significant differences) and a more complex vascular access. Chronic red blood cell exchange favours psychosocial factors such as anxiety and social functioning, but the impact of using aRBCX in these parameters is not determined yet.
Conclusion: aRBCX, known to be an efficient procedure to manage SCD, appears to be promising in improving patients' QoL. However, more comprehensive studies incorporating patient-reported outcomes are needed to fully understand the impact of different transfusion modalities on QoL in SCD patients. An integrated care approach, including psychological support and pain management, may further enhance QoL.
期刊介绍:
Vox Sanguinis reports on important, novel developments in transfusion medicine. Original papers, reviews and international fora are published on all aspects of blood transfusion and tissue transplantation, comprising five main sections:
1) Transfusion - Transmitted Disease and its Prevention:
Identification and epidemiology of infectious agents transmissible by blood;
Bacterial contamination of blood components;
Donor recruitment and selection methods;
Pathogen inactivation.
2) Blood Component Collection and Production:
Blood collection methods and devices (including apheresis);
Plasma fractionation techniques and plasma derivatives;
Preparation of labile blood components;
Inventory management;
Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and storage;
Collection and storage of tissues;
Quality management and good manufacturing practice;
Automation and information technology.
3) Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies:
Transfusion thresholds and audits;
Haemovigilance;
Clinical trials regarding appropriate haemotherapy;
Non-infectious adverse affects of transfusion;
Therapeutic apheresis;
Support of transplant patients;
Gene therapy and immunotherapy.
4) Immunohaematology and Immunogenetics:
Autoimmunity in haematology;
Alloimmunity of blood;
Pre-transfusion testing;
Immunodiagnostics;
Immunobiology;
Complement in immunohaematology;
Blood typing reagents;
Genetic markers of blood cells and serum proteins: polymorphisms and function;
Genetic markers and disease;
Parentage testing and forensic immunohaematology.
5) Cellular Therapy:
Cell-based therapies;
Stem cell sources;
Stem cell processing and storage;
Stem cell products;
Stem cell plasticity;
Regenerative medicine with cells;
Cellular immunotherapy;
Molecular therapy;
Gene therapy.