Suma K Thareja, Xin Yang, Paramita Basak Upama, Aziz Abdullah, Shary Pérez Torres, Linda Jackson Cocroft, Michael Bubolz, Kari McGaughey, Xuelin Lou, Sailaja Kamaraju, Sheikh Iqbal Ahamed, Praveen Madiraju, Anne E Kwitek, Jeffrey Whittle, Zeno Franco
{"title":"与有色人种社区开展以社区为基础的公平参与式研究,推动了 \"我们威斯康星人 \"基因组研究的优先事项。","authors":"Suma K Thareja, Xin Yang, Paramita Basak Upama, Aziz Abdullah, Shary Pérez Torres, Linda Jackson Cocroft, Michael Bubolz, Kari McGaughey, Xuelin Lou, Sailaja Kamaraju, Sheikh Iqbal Ahamed, Praveen Madiraju, Anne E Kwitek, Jeffrey Whittle, Zeno Franco","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocae265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The NIH All of Us Research Program aims to advance personalized medicine by not only linking patient records, surveys, and genomic data but also engaging with participants, particularly from groups traditionally underrepresented in biomedical research (UBR). This study details how the dialogue between scientists and community members, including many from communities of color, shaped local research priorities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We recruited area quantitative, basic, and clinical scientists as well as community members from our Community and Participant Advisory Boards with a predetermined interest in All of Us research as members of a Special Interest Group (SIG). An expert community engagement scientist facilitated 6 SIG meetings over the year, explicitly fostering openness and flexibility during conversations. We qualitatively analyzed discussions using a social movement framework tailored for community-based participatory research (CBPR) mobilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SIG evolved through CBPR stages of emergence, coalescence, momentum, and maintenance/integration. Researchers prioritized community needs above personal academic interests while community members kept discussions focused on tangible return of value to communities. One key outcome includes SIG-driven shifts in programmatic and research priorities of the All of Us Research Program in Southeastern Wisconsin. One major challenge was building equitable conversations that balanced scientific rigor and community understanding.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our approach allowed for a rich dialogue to emerge. Points of connection and disconnection between community members and scientists offered important guidance for emerging areas of genomic inquiry.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study presents a robust foundation for future efforts to engage diverse communities in CBPR, particularly on healthcare concerns affecting UBR communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equitable community-based participatory research engagement with communities of color drives All of Us Wisconsin genomic research priorities.\",\"authors\":\"Suma K Thareja, Xin Yang, Paramita Basak Upama, Aziz Abdullah, Shary Pérez Torres, Linda Jackson Cocroft, Michael Bubolz, Kari McGaughey, Xuelin Lou, Sailaja Kamaraju, Sheikh Iqbal Ahamed, Praveen Madiraju, Anne E Kwitek, Jeffrey Whittle, Zeno Franco\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocae265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The NIH All of Us Research Program aims to advance personalized medicine by not only linking patient records, surveys, and genomic data but also engaging with participants, particularly from groups traditionally underrepresented in biomedical research (UBR). This study details how the dialogue between scientists and community members, including many from communities of color, shaped local research priorities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We recruited area quantitative, basic, and clinical scientists as well as community members from our Community and Participant Advisory Boards with a predetermined interest in All of Us research as members of a Special Interest Group (SIG). An expert community engagement scientist facilitated 6 SIG meetings over the year, explicitly fostering openness and flexibility during conversations. We qualitatively analyzed discussions using a social movement framework tailored for community-based participatory research (CBPR) mobilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SIG evolved through CBPR stages of emergence, coalescence, momentum, and maintenance/integration. Researchers prioritized community needs above personal academic interests while community members kept discussions focused on tangible return of value to communities. One key outcome includes SIG-driven shifts in programmatic and research priorities of the All of Us Research Program in Southeastern Wisconsin. One major challenge was building equitable conversations that balanced scientific rigor and community understanding.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our approach allowed for a rich dialogue to emerge. Points of connection and disconnection between community members and scientists offered important guidance for emerging areas of genomic inquiry.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study presents a robust foundation for future efforts to engage diverse communities in CBPR, particularly on healthcare concerns affecting UBR communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae265\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的 "我们所有人研究计划"(All of Us Research Program)旨在推动个性化医疗的发展,该计划不仅要将患者记录、调查和基因组数据联系起来,还要让参与者参与进来,尤其是那些传统上在生物医学研究领域代表性不足的群体(UBR)。本研究详细介绍了科学家与社区成员(包括许多来自有色人种社区的成员)之间的对话是如何影响当地研究重点的:我们从社区和参与者咨询委员会中招募了地区定量、基础和临床科学家以及对 "我们所有人 "研究有兴趣的社区成员,作为特别兴趣小组(SIG)的成员。在这一年中,一位社区参与科学家专家主持了 6 次 SIG 会议,明确提出要在对话中培养开放性和灵活性。我们使用为社区参与式研究(CBPR)动员量身定制的社会运动框架对讨论进行了定性分析:结果:SIG 经历了 CBPR 的兴起、凝聚、动力和维持/整合阶段。研究人员将社区需求置于个人学术利益之上,而社区成员则将讨论重点放在对社区的实际价值回报上。其中一项重要成果包括,在 SIG 的推动下,威斯康星州东南部的 "我们大家 "研究计划的计划和研究重点发生了变化。一个主要挑战是建立公平的对话,平衡科学的严谨性和社区的理解:我们的方法使丰富的对话得以出现。社区成员与科学家之间的联系点和脱节点为基因组研究的新兴领域提供了重要指导:我们的研究为今后让不同社区参与 CBPR,特别是影响 UBR 社区的医疗保健问题奠定了坚实的基础。
Equitable community-based participatory research engagement with communities of color drives All of Us Wisconsin genomic research priorities.
Objective: The NIH All of Us Research Program aims to advance personalized medicine by not only linking patient records, surveys, and genomic data but also engaging with participants, particularly from groups traditionally underrepresented in biomedical research (UBR). This study details how the dialogue between scientists and community members, including many from communities of color, shaped local research priorities.
Materials and methods: We recruited area quantitative, basic, and clinical scientists as well as community members from our Community and Participant Advisory Boards with a predetermined interest in All of Us research as members of a Special Interest Group (SIG). An expert community engagement scientist facilitated 6 SIG meetings over the year, explicitly fostering openness and flexibility during conversations. We qualitatively analyzed discussions using a social movement framework tailored for community-based participatory research (CBPR) mobilization.
Results: The SIG evolved through CBPR stages of emergence, coalescence, momentum, and maintenance/integration. Researchers prioritized community needs above personal academic interests while community members kept discussions focused on tangible return of value to communities. One key outcome includes SIG-driven shifts in programmatic and research priorities of the All of Us Research Program in Southeastern Wisconsin. One major challenge was building equitable conversations that balanced scientific rigor and community understanding.
Discussion: Our approach allowed for a rich dialogue to emerge. Points of connection and disconnection between community members and scientists offered important guidance for emerging areas of genomic inquiry.
Conclusion: Our study presents a robust foundation for future efforts to engage diverse communities in CBPR, particularly on healthcare concerns affecting UBR communities.
期刊介绍:
JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.