{"title":"全科预约的数量和类型与患者体验之间有什么关系?对英格兰全科医生的观察研究。","authors":"Patrick Burch, William Whittaker, Yiu-Shing Lau","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Patient satisfaction is a significant dimension of quality in general practice and has notably declined post-COVID. Understanding the dynamics between practice activities, practice characteristics and patient experience is vital for improving care quality. Aim This study investigates the relationship between the volume, modality (telephone or face-to-face) and practitioner type of general practice appointments and patient experience. Design and Setting An observational study of general practices in England. Method Data from the General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS) were merged with NHS Digital's practice level appointment data, covering August 2022 to March 2023. We estimate ordinary least squares regressions of patient satisfaction with access, general satisfaction, preference for a specific GP, and support for managing long-term conditions (dependent variables) against appointment volume, modality (telephone or face-to-face), and practitioner type. Results Analysis of 5,278 practices showed that a higher volume of appointments, especially face-to-face with GPs, was significantly (p<0.001) associated with increased patient satisfaction. Practices having a greater proportion of same-day appointments was significantly correlated with lower patient satisfaction. Conclusion Patient satisfaction and ability to have health needs met is associated with face-to-face access to GPs as well as the total volume of appointments available. The results suggest that patients' perceptions of access involve more than immediate availability of appointments or that patients may struggle to get appointments at practices offering more same day appointments. Initiatives to improve access to and satisfaction with general practice should prioritise expanding face-to-face GP appointments.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the relationship between the volume and type of appointments in general practice and patient experience? An observational study of general practice in England.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Burch, William Whittaker, Yiu-Shing Lau\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Patient satisfaction is a significant dimension of quality in general practice and has notably declined post-COVID. Understanding the dynamics between practice activities, practice characteristics and patient experience is vital for improving care quality. Aim This study investigates the relationship between the volume, modality (telephone or face-to-face) and practitioner type of general practice appointments and patient experience. Design and Setting An observational study of general practices in England. Method Data from the General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS) were merged with NHS Digital's practice level appointment data, covering August 2022 to March 2023. We estimate ordinary least squares regressions of patient satisfaction with access, general satisfaction, preference for a specific GP, and support for managing long-term conditions (dependent variables) against appointment volume, modality (telephone or face-to-face), and practitioner type. Results Analysis of 5,278 practices showed that a higher volume of appointments, especially face-to-face with GPs, was significantly (p<0.001) associated with increased patient satisfaction. Practices having a greater proportion of same-day appointments was significantly correlated with lower patient satisfaction. Conclusion Patient satisfaction and ability to have health needs met is associated with face-to-face access to GPs as well as the total volume of appointments available. The results suggest that patients' perceptions of access involve more than immediate availability of appointments or that patients may struggle to get appointments at practices offering more same day appointments. Initiatives to improve access to and satisfaction with general practice should prioritise expanding face-to-face GP appointments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0276\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
What is the relationship between the volume and type of appointments in general practice and patient experience? An observational study of general practice in England.
Background Patient satisfaction is a significant dimension of quality in general practice and has notably declined post-COVID. Understanding the dynamics between practice activities, practice characteristics and patient experience is vital for improving care quality. Aim This study investigates the relationship between the volume, modality (telephone or face-to-face) and practitioner type of general practice appointments and patient experience. Design and Setting An observational study of general practices in England. Method Data from the General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS) were merged with NHS Digital's practice level appointment data, covering August 2022 to March 2023. We estimate ordinary least squares regressions of patient satisfaction with access, general satisfaction, preference for a specific GP, and support for managing long-term conditions (dependent variables) against appointment volume, modality (telephone or face-to-face), and practitioner type. Results Analysis of 5,278 practices showed that a higher volume of appointments, especially face-to-face with GPs, was significantly (p<0.001) associated with increased patient satisfaction. Practices having a greater proportion of same-day appointments was significantly correlated with lower patient satisfaction. Conclusion Patient satisfaction and ability to have health needs met is associated with face-to-face access to GPs as well as the total volume of appointments available. The results suggest that patients' perceptions of access involve more than immediate availability of appointments or that patients may struggle to get appointments at practices offering more same day appointments. Initiatives to improve access to and satisfaction with general practice should prioritise expanding face-to-face GP appointments.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide.
BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.