{"title":"绘制共享电动自行车与公共交通之间的连接和替代行为图","authors":"Jianhong Ye, Jiahao Bai, Marco Diana","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10550-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The emergence and development of shared E-bicycles (SEB) has resulted in complex connection and substitution relationships with public transportation (PT) in urban areas, impacting the social benefits of integrated transportation systems and the return on investment of PT subsidies. Accurately identifying how SEB complement and/or compete with PT is still a crucial challenge. Therefore, this research proposes a new discrimination method based on multi-source data fusion to address this issue. The method’s discrimination accuracy is evaluated based on both telephone interviews data and transaction data from SEB users in Shenyang City, China. The results indicate that SEB are primarily used for single-mode trips (75%). When SEB are used to combine with other modes, they mainly serve as connecting modes to rail transit (22.1%). On the other hand, shared bicycles (SB) and buses are the two modes most replaced by SEB, followed by private cars and walking. 63% of SEB rides can be accurately classified by the proposed method in terms of their connection and substitution relationship with PT. Incorporating anonymized socioeconomic attribute information from big data holds promise for further enhancing the method’s performance. This research provides key insights for assessing the societal benefits of SEBs on PT, offering valuable theoretical and methodological support for transportation planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping connection and substitution behaviors between shared E-bicycles and public transportation\",\"authors\":\"Jianhong Ye, Jiahao Bai, Marco Diana\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11116-024-10550-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The emergence and development of shared E-bicycles (SEB) has resulted in complex connection and substitution relationships with public transportation (PT) in urban areas, impacting the social benefits of integrated transportation systems and the return on investment of PT subsidies. Accurately identifying how SEB complement and/or compete with PT is still a crucial challenge. Therefore, this research proposes a new discrimination method based on multi-source data fusion to address this issue. The method’s discrimination accuracy is evaluated based on both telephone interviews data and transaction data from SEB users in Shenyang City, China. The results indicate that SEB are primarily used for single-mode trips (75%). When SEB are used to combine with other modes, they mainly serve as connecting modes to rail transit (22.1%). On the other hand, shared bicycles (SB) and buses are the two modes most replaced by SEB, followed by private cars and walking. 63% of SEB rides can be accurately classified by the proposed method in terms of their connection and substitution relationship with PT. Incorporating anonymized socioeconomic attribute information from big data holds promise for further enhancing the method’s performance. This research provides key insights for assessing the societal benefits of SEBs on PT, offering valuable theoretical and methodological support for transportation planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10550-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10550-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mapping connection and substitution behaviors between shared E-bicycles and public transportation
The emergence and development of shared E-bicycles (SEB) has resulted in complex connection and substitution relationships with public transportation (PT) in urban areas, impacting the social benefits of integrated transportation systems and the return on investment of PT subsidies. Accurately identifying how SEB complement and/or compete with PT is still a crucial challenge. Therefore, this research proposes a new discrimination method based on multi-source data fusion to address this issue. The method’s discrimination accuracy is evaluated based on both telephone interviews data and transaction data from SEB users in Shenyang City, China. The results indicate that SEB are primarily used for single-mode trips (75%). When SEB are used to combine with other modes, they mainly serve as connecting modes to rail transit (22.1%). On the other hand, shared bicycles (SB) and buses are the two modes most replaced by SEB, followed by private cars and walking. 63% of SEB rides can be accurately classified by the proposed method in terms of their connection and substitution relationship with PT. Incorporating anonymized socioeconomic attribute information from big data holds promise for further enhancing the method’s performance. This research provides key insights for assessing the societal benefits of SEBs on PT, offering valuable theoretical and methodological support for transportation planning.
期刊介绍:
In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world.
These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.