PSMA PET/CT 对根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术临床决策的影响。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Nuclear Medicine Communications Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1097/MNM.0000000000001916
Oktay Özman, Hans Veerman, Marinus J Hagens, Pim J van Leeuwen, André N Vis, Henk G van der Poel
{"title":"PSMA PET/CT 对根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术临床决策的影响。","authors":"Oktay Özman, Hans Veerman, Marinus J Hagens, Pim J van Leeuwen, André N Vis, Henk G van der Poel","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT) on clinical decision-making of radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) after its utilization in daily clinical practice at an European high-volume cancer center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who had unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer between 2017 and 2021 were included retrospectively and divided into two groups; those who staged using PSMA PET/CT (group 1) and those who staged using conventional modalities (group 2). Clinical decision-making of RP over nonsurgical treatments and f PLND were primary endpoints and evaluated using regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSMA PET/CT claimed significantly more N1 (24.2% vs. 11.3%; P = 0.01; OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.18-3.28) but insignificantly more M1 disease (9.9% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.42; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.39-9.23), compared with the conventional imaging modalities. miN0 stage was related to more RP decisions compared with cN0 stage (P < 0.001; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.48-2.46). PLND decision-making was significantly driven by positive c\\miN stage findings, which were more reliable when it was reported after a PSMA PET/CT examination (P < 0.001; OR, 35.55; 95% CI, 6.74-187.45 for conventional imaging modalities vs. P < 0.001; OR, 91.72; 95% CI, 11.25-747.56 for PSMA PET/CT).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with no suspicion of lymph node invasion on molecular imaging (PSMA PET/CT) tended to be referred to RP more compared to radiological imaging. Also, the PLND decision was strongly driven by staging findings. Compared with conventional imaging, PSMA PET/CT findings were more reliable during PLND decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of PSMA PET/CT on clinical decision-making of radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.\",\"authors\":\"Oktay Özman, Hans Veerman, Marinus J Hagens, Pim J van Leeuwen, André N Vis, Henk G van der Poel\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT) on clinical decision-making of radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) after its utilization in daily clinical practice at an European high-volume cancer center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who had unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer between 2017 and 2021 were included retrospectively and divided into two groups; those who staged using PSMA PET/CT (group 1) and those who staged using conventional modalities (group 2). Clinical decision-making of RP over nonsurgical treatments and f PLND were primary endpoints and evaluated using regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSMA PET/CT claimed significantly more N1 (24.2% vs. 11.3%; P = 0.01; OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.18-3.28) but insignificantly more M1 disease (9.9% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.42; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.39-9.23), compared with the conventional imaging modalities. miN0 stage was related to more RP decisions compared with cN0 stage (P < 0.001; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.48-2.46). PLND decision-making was significantly driven by positive c\\\\miN stage findings, which were more reliable when it was reported after a PSMA PET/CT examination (P < 0.001; OR, 35.55; 95% CI, 6.74-187.45 for conventional imaging modalities vs. P < 0.001; OR, 91.72; 95% CI, 11.25-747.56 for PSMA PET/CT).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with no suspicion of lymph node invasion on molecular imaging (PSMA PET/CT) tended to be referred to RP more compared to radiological imaging. Also, the PLND decision was strongly driven by staging findings. Compared with conventional imaging, PSMA PET/CT findings were more reliable during PLND decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001916\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)PET/计算机断层扫描(CT)在欧洲一家高容量癌症中心的日常临床实践中使用后,对根治性前列腺切除术(RP)和盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)临床决策的影响:回顾性纳入2017年至2021年期间患有中高危前列腺癌的患者,并将其分为两组:使用PSMA PET/CT分期的患者(第1组)和使用传统方式分期的患者(第2组)。RP优于非手术治疗和PLND的临床决策是主要终点,并使用回归模型进行评估:与传统成像模式相比,PSMA PET/CT 发现的 N1 病变明显增多(24.2% 对 11.3%;P = 0.01;OR,1.97;95% CI,1.18-3.28),但 M1 病变显著增多(9.9% 对 5.7%;P = 0.42;OR,1.91;95% CI,0.39-9.23):与放射成像相比,分子成像(PSMA PET/CT)未怀疑淋巴结侵犯的患者更倾向于转诊至RP。此外,PLND 的决定主要受分期结果的影响。与传统成像相比,PSMA PET/CT 的结果在 PLND 决策中更为可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of PSMA PET/CT on clinical decision-making of radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT) on clinical decision-making of radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) after its utilization in daily clinical practice at an European high-volume cancer center.

Materials and methods: Patients who had unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer between 2017 and 2021 were included retrospectively and divided into two groups; those who staged using PSMA PET/CT (group 1) and those who staged using conventional modalities (group 2). Clinical decision-making of RP over nonsurgical treatments and f PLND were primary endpoints and evaluated using regression models.

Results: PSMA PET/CT claimed significantly more N1 (24.2% vs. 11.3%; P = 0.01; OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.18-3.28) but insignificantly more M1 disease (9.9% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.42; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.39-9.23), compared with the conventional imaging modalities. miN0 stage was related to more RP decisions compared with cN0 stage (P < 0.001; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.48-2.46). PLND decision-making was significantly driven by positive c\miN stage findings, which were more reliable when it was reported after a PSMA PET/CT examination (P < 0.001; OR, 35.55; 95% CI, 6.74-187.45 for conventional imaging modalities vs. P < 0.001; OR, 91.72; 95% CI, 11.25-747.56 for PSMA PET/CT).

Conclusions: Patients with no suspicion of lymph node invasion on molecular imaging (PSMA PET/CT) tended to be referred to RP more compared to radiological imaging. Also, the PLND decision was strongly driven by staging findings. Compared with conventional imaging, PSMA PET/CT findings were more reliable during PLND decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Correlation between 18 F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and microvascular invasion before liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Evaluation of jaw pathologies of patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw using a computer program to assess the bone scan index: comparison of standardized uptake values with bone SPECT/CT. Parametric imaging in salivary gland scintigraphy. Predicting invasiveness of ground-glass nodules in lung adenocarcinoma: based on preoperative 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography and high-resolution computed tomography. SeHCAT retention measurements may be compromised by traces of 177 Lu/ 177m Lu more than 90 days after 177 Lu-DOTATATE was administered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1