Oktay Özman, Hans Veerman, Marinus J Hagens, Pim J van Leeuwen, André N Vis, Henk G van der Poel
{"title":"PSMA PET/CT 对根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术临床决策的影响。","authors":"Oktay Özman, Hans Veerman, Marinus J Hagens, Pim J van Leeuwen, André N Vis, Henk G van der Poel","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT) on clinical decision-making of radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) after its utilization in daily clinical practice at an European high-volume cancer center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who had unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer between 2017 and 2021 were included retrospectively and divided into two groups; those who staged using PSMA PET/CT (group 1) and those who staged using conventional modalities (group 2). Clinical decision-making of RP over nonsurgical treatments and f PLND were primary endpoints and evaluated using regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSMA PET/CT claimed significantly more N1 (24.2% vs. 11.3%; P = 0.01; OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.18-3.28) but insignificantly more M1 disease (9.9% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.42; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.39-9.23), compared with the conventional imaging modalities. miN0 stage was related to more RP decisions compared with cN0 stage (P < 0.001; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.48-2.46). PLND decision-making was significantly driven by positive c\\miN stage findings, which were more reliable when it was reported after a PSMA PET/CT examination (P < 0.001; OR, 35.55; 95% CI, 6.74-187.45 for conventional imaging modalities vs. P < 0.001; OR, 91.72; 95% CI, 11.25-747.56 for PSMA PET/CT).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with no suspicion of lymph node invasion on molecular imaging (PSMA PET/CT) tended to be referred to RP more compared to radiological imaging. Also, the PLND decision was strongly driven by staging findings. Compared with conventional imaging, PSMA PET/CT findings were more reliable during PLND decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of PSMA PET/CT on clinical decision-making of radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.\",\"authors\":\"Oktay Özman, Hans Veerman, Marinus J Hagens, Pim J van Leeuwen, André N Vis, Henk G van der Poel\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT) on clinical decision-making of radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) after its utilization in daily clinical practice at an European high-volume cancer center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who had unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer between 2017 and 2021 were included retrospectively and divided into two groups; those who staged using PSMA PET/CT (group 1) and those who staged using conventional modalities (group 2). Clinical decision-making of RP over nonsurgical treatments and f PLND were primary endpoints and evaluated using regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSMA PET/CT claimed significantly more N1 (24.2% vs. 11.3%; P = 0.01; OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.18-3.28) but insignificantly more M1 disease (9.9% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.42; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.39-9.23), compared with the conventional imaging modalities. miN0 stage was related to more RP decisions compared with cN0 stage (P < 0.001; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.48-2.46). PLND decision-making was significantly driven by positive c\\\\miN stage findings, which were more reliable when it was reported after a PSMA PET/CT examination (P < 0.001; OR, 35.55; 95% CI, 6.74-187.45 for conventional imaging modalities vs. P < 0.001; OR, 91.72; 95% CI, 11.25-747.56 for PSMA PET/CT).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with no suspicion of lymph node invasion on molecular imaging (PSMA PET/CT) tended to be referred to RP more compared to radiological imaging. Also, the PLND decision was strongly driven by staging findings. Compared with conventional imaging, PSMA PET/CT findings were more reliable during PLND decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001916\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of PSMA PET/CT on clinical decision-making of radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT) on clinical decision-making of radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) after its utilization in daily clinical practice at an European high-volume cancer center.
Materials and methods: Patients who had unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer between 2017 and 2021 were included retrospectively and divided into two groups; those who staged using PSMA PET/CT (group 1) and those who staged using conventional modalities (group 2). Clinical decision-making of RP over nonsurgical treatments and f PLND were primary endpoints and evaluated using regression models.
Results: PSMA PET/CT claimed significantly more N1 (24.2% vs. 11.3%; P = 0.01; OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.18-3.28) but insignificantly more M1 disease (9.9% vs. 5.7%; P = 0.42; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.39-9.23), compared with the conventional imaging modalities. miN0 stage was related to more RP decisions compared with cN0 stage (P < 0.001; OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.48-2.46). PLND decision-making was significantly driven by positive c\miN stage findings, which were more reliable when it was reported after a PSMA PET/CT examination (P < 0.001; OR, 35.55; 95% CI, 6.74-187.45 for conventional imaging modalities vs. P < 0.001; OR, 91.72; 95% CI, 11.25-747.56 for PSMA PET/CT).
Conclusions: Patients with no suspicion of lymph node invasion on molecular imaging (PSMA PET/CT) tended to be referred to RP more compared to radiological imaging. Also, the PLND decision was strongly driven by staging findings. Compared with conventional imaging, PSMA PET/CT findings were more reliable during PLND decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.