针对转业退伍军人的心理调整和重返社会计划的可行性、可接受性和初步成果。

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY BMC Psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1186/s40359-024-02097-7
Madeline Romaniuk, Elise Saunders-Dow, Kelly Brown, Philip J Batterham
{"title":"针对转业退伍军人的心理调整和重返社会计划的可行性、可接受性和初步成果。","authors":"Madeline Romaniuk, Elise Saunders-Dow, Kelly Brown, Philip J Batterham","doi":"10.1186/s40359-024-02097-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reintegration and adjustment to civilian life after military service is crucial for veterans' mental and physical health. However, there is a lack of evidence-based interventions in Australia that specifically address the psychological and cultural factors associated with improved adjustment and mental health in this group. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and initial outcomes of a novel group intervention program, developed to address this gap in supports and services for Australian veterans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A non-controlled, within-subjects longitudinal design was employed with a feasibility framework including assessment of demand, implementation, integration, experience, perceived effectiveness, and burden or discomfort. The program included eight weekly 2.5-hour group sessions using cognitive-behavioural and acceptance and commitment therapy techniques. Participants included 24 transitioned veterans who completed the Military-Civilian Adjustment and Reintegration Measure, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21, and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and three-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High participant ratings of engagement, experience and usefulness of the program were found, as well as perceived improvement in adjustment to civilian life as a result of the program. Sound program retention (82.8%), completion (87.5%), and manual adherence rates (89.6%) were also found. Significant improvements were found in adjustment and reintegration scores from pre-intervention to post-intervention (p = < 0.001) and from pre-intervention to follow-up (p = < 0.05), with large effect size (η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.344). All participants who completed the program reported they would recommend the program to another veteran.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of a novel group intervention program designed for military veterans in Australia. The program showed promising initial evidence of effectiveness in improving adjustment and reintegration to civilian life and provides an essential first step towards addressing a substantial gap in services for veterans struggling to adjust to civilian life. A randomised controlled trial may be an appropriate next step.</p><p><strong>Anzctr registration number: </strong>ACTRN12622000172707.</p><p><strong>Date of registration: </strong>02/02/2022.</p><p><strong>Type of registration: </strong>Retrospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"12 1","pages":"597"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility, acceptability, and initial outcomes of a psychological adjustment and reintegration program for transitioned military veterans.\",\"authors\":\"Madeline Romaniuk, Elise Saunders-Dow, Kelly Brown, Philip J Batterham\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40359-024-02097-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reintegration and adjustment to civilian life after military service is crucial for veterans' mental and physical health. However, there is a lack of evidence-based interventions in Australia that specifically address the psychological and cultural factors associated with improved adjustment and mental health in this group. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and initial outcomes of a novel group intervention program, developed to address this gap in supports and services for Australian veterans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A non-controlled, within-subjects longitudinal design was employed with a feasibility framework including assessment of demand, implementation, integration, experience, perceived effectiveness, and burden or discomfort. The program included eight weekly 2.5-hour group sessions using cognitive-behavioural and acceptance and commitment therapy techniques. Participants included 24 transitioned veterans who completed the Military-Civilian Adjustment and Reintegration Measure, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21, and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and three-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High participant ratings of engagement, experience and usefulness of the program were found, as well as perceived improvement in adjustment to civilian life as a result of the program. Sound program retention (82.8%), completion (87.5%), and manual adherence rates (89.6%) were also found. Significant improvements were found in adjustment and reintegration scores from pre-intervention to post-intervention (p = < 0.001) and from pre-intervention to follow-up (p = < 0.05), with large effect size (η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.344). All participants who completed the program reported they would recommend the program to another veteran.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of a novel group intervention program designed for military veterans in Australia. The program showed promising initial evidence of effectiveness in improving adjustment and reintegration to civilian life and provides an essential first step towards addressing a substantial gap in services for veterans struggling to adjust to civilian life. A randomised controlled trial may be an appropriate next step.</p><p><strong>Anzctr registration number: </strong>ACTRN12622000172707.</p><p><strong>Date of registration: </strong>02/02/2022.</p><p><strong>Type of registration: </strong>Retrospectively registered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"597\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520692/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02097-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02097-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:退伍后重新融入和适应平民生活对退伍军人的身心健康至关重要。然而,澳大利亚缺乏专门针对与改善该群体适应性和心理健康相关的心理和文化因素的循证干预措施。本研究旨在评估一项新颖的团体干预计划的可行性、可接受性和初步成果,该计划的开发是为了填补澳大利亚退伍军人支持和服务方面的这一空白:方法: 采用非对照、主体内纵向设计,可行性框架包括需求评估、实施、整合、体验、感知效果以及负担或不适。该计划包括每周八节 2.5 小时的小组课程,采用认知行为疗法和接受与承诺疗法技术。参与者包括 24 名转业退伍军人,他们在干预前、干预后和三个月的随访中完成了军民适应和重返社会测量、生活质量享受和满意度问卷--简表、抑郁焦虑压力量表--21 和 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍清单:结果: 参与者对项目的参与度、体验和实用性给予了很高的评价,并认为项目改善了他们对平民生活的适应。此外,还发现了良好的计划保持率(82.8%)、完成率(87.5%)和手册坚持率(89.6%)。从干预前到干预后,适应性和重返社会得分均有显著提高(p = p2 = 0.344)。所有完成项目的参与者都表示会向其他退伍军人推荐该项目:本研究证明了为澳大利亚退伍军人设计的新型小组干预计划的可行性和可接受性。该计划在改善适应和重新融入平民生活方面显示出了令人鼓舞的初步有效性,为解决退伍军人在适应平民生活方面存在的巨大服务缺口迈出了重要的第一步。下一步可能需要进行随机对照试验:ACTRN12622000172707.Date of registration:02/02/2022.注册类型:追溯注册:注册类型:追溯注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility, acceptability, and initial outcomes of a psychological adjustment and reintegration program for transitioned military veterans.

Background: Reintegration and adjustment to civilian life after military service is crucial for veterans' mental and physical health. However, there is a lack of evidence-based interventions in Australia that specifically address the psychological and cultural factors associated with improved adjustment and mental health in this group. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and initial outcomes of a novel group intervention program, developed to address this gap in supports and services for Australian veterans.

Methods: A non-controlled, within-subjects longitudinal design was employed with a feasibility framework including assessment of demand, implementation, integration, experience, perceived effectiveness, and burden or discomfort. The program included eight weekly 2.5-hour group sessions using cognitive-behavioural and acceptance and commitment therapy techniques. Participants included 24 transitioned veterans who completed the Military-Civilian Adjustment and Reintegration Measure, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21, and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and three-month follow-up.

Results: High participant ratings of engagement, experience and usefulness of the program were found, as well as perceived improvement in adjustment to civilian life as a result of the program. Sound program retention (82.8%), completion (87.5%), and manual adherence rates (89.6%) were also found. Significant improvements were found in adjustment and reintegration scores from pre-intervention to post-intervention (p = < 0.001) and from pre-intervention to follow-up (p = < 0.05), with large effect size (ηp2 = 0.344). All participants who completed the program reported they would recommend the program to another veteran.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of a novel group intervention program designed for military veterans in Australia. The program showed promising initial evidence of effectiveness in improving adjustment and reintegration to civilian life and provides an essential first step towards addressing a substantial gap in services for veterans struggling to adjust to civilian life. A randomised controlled trial may be an appropriate next step.

Anzctr registration number: ACTRN12622000172707.

Date of registration: 02/02/2022.

Type of registration: Retrospectively registered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
期刊最新文献
When a bleak future comes closer: interaction effects of emotion and temporal distance framing in climate change communication. Father involvement and emotion regulation during early childhood: a systematic review. The effects of digital CBT intervention on attentional bias and sleep quality of poor sleepers with insomnia symptoms. Relationship between different levels of internet use and depressive tendencies in Chinese college students: the chain mediating effect based on physical activity and social adaptability. Assessing the suitability and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the YP-CORE for adolescents in Latin America: a study in Ecuador.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1