非吞咽任务中咽部面积测量变化的初步探索

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research Pub Date : 2024-11-07 Epub Date: 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00418
Catriona M Steele, Renata Mancopes, Emily Barrett, Vanessa Panes, Melanie Peladeau-Pigeon, Michelle M Simmons, Sana Smaoui
{"title":"非吞咽任务中咽部面积测量变化的初步探索","authors":"Catriona M Steele, Renata Mancopes, Emily Barrett, Vanessa Panes, Melanie Peladeau-Pigeon, Michelle M Simmons, Sana Smaoui","doi":"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Age- and disease-related changes in oropharyngeal anatomy and physiology may be identified through quantitative videofluoroscopic measures of pharyngeal area and dynamics. Pixel-based measures of nonconstricted pharyngeal area (PhAR) are typically taken during oral bolus hold tasks or on postswallow rest frames. A recent study in 87 healthy adults reported mean postswallow PhAR of 62%(C2-4)<sup>2</sup>, (range: 25%-135%), and significantly larger PhAR in males. The fact that measures were taken after initial bolus swallows without controlling for the presence of subsequent clearing swallows was identified as a potential source of variation. A subset of study participants had completed a protocol including additional static nonswallowing tasks, enabling us to explore variability across those tasks, taking sex differences into account.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Videofluoroscopy still shots were analyzed for 20 healthy adults (10 males, 10 females, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 26 years) in head-neutral position, chin-down and chin-up positions, a sustained /a/ vowel vocalization, and oral bolus hold tasks (1-cc, 5-cc). Trained raters used ImageJ software to measure PhAR in %(C2-4)<sup>2</sup> units. Measures were compared to previously reported mean postswallow PhAR for the same participants: (a) explorations of sex differences; (b) pairwise linear mixed-model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) of PhAR for each nonswallowing task versus postswallow measures, controlling for sex; and (c) a combined mixed-model ANOVA to confirm comparability of the subset of tasks showing no significant differences from postswallow measures in Step 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, PhAR measures were significantly larger in male participants; however, most pairwise task comparisons did not differ by sex. No significant differences from postswallow measures were seen for 5-cc bolus hold, chin-down and chin-up postures, and the second (but not the first) of two repeated head neutral still shots. PhAR during a 5-cc bolus hold was most similar to postswallow measures: mean ± standard deviation of 51 ± 13%(C2-4)<sup>2</sup> in females and 64 ± 16%(C2-4)<sup>2</sup> in males.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PhAR is larger in men than in women. Oral bolus hold tasks with a 5-cc liquid bolus yield similar measures to those obtained from postswallow rest frames.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"4304-4313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary Exploration of Variations in Measures of Pharyngeal Area During Nonswallowing Tasks.\",\"authors\":\"Catriona M Steele, Renata Mancopes, Emily Barrett, Vanessa Panes, Melanie Peladeau-Pigeon, Michelle M Simmons, Sana Smaoui\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Age- and disease-related changes in oropharyngeal anatomy and physiology may be identified through quantitative videofluoroscopic measures of pharyngeal area and dynamics. Pixel-based measures of nonconstricted pharyngeal area (PhAR) are typically taken during oral bolus hold tasks or on postswallow rest frames. A recent study in 87 healthy adults reported mean postswallow PhAR of 62%(C2-4)<sup>2</sup>, (range: 25%-135%), and significantly larger PhAR in males. The fact that measures were taken after initial bolus swallows without controlling for the presence of subsequent clearing swallows was identified as a potential source of variation. A subset of study participants had completed a protocol including additional static nonswallowing tasks, enabling us to explore variability across those tasks, taking sex differences into account.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Videofluoroscopy still shots were analyzed for 20 healthy adults (10 males, 10 females, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 26 years) in head-neutral position, chin-down and chin-up positions, a sustained /a/ vowel vocalization, and oral bolus hold tasks (1-cc, 5-cc). Trained raters used ImageJ software to measure PhAR in %(C2-4)<sup>2</sup> units. Measures were compared to previously reported mean postswallow PhAR for the same participants: (a) explorations of sex differences; (b) pairwise linear mixed-model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) of PhAR for each nonswallowing task versus postswallow measures, controlling for sex; and (c) a combined mixed-model ANOVA to confirm comparability of the subset of tasks showing no significant differences from postswallow measures in Step 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, PhAR measures were significantly larger in male participants; however, most pairwise task comparisons did not differ by sex. No significant differences from postswallow measures were seen for 5-cc bolus hold, chin-down and chin-up postures, and the second (but not the first) of two repeated head neutral still shots. PhAR during a 5-cc bolus hold was most similar to postswallow measures: mean ± standard deviation of 51 ± 13%(C2-4)<sup>2</sup> in females and 64 ± 16%(C2-4)<sup>2</sup> in males.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PhAR is larger in men than in women. Oral bolus hold tasks with a 5-cc liquid bolus yield similar measures to those obtained from postswallow rest frames.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4304-4313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567086/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00418\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:口咽解剖和生理学中与年龄和疾病相关的变化可通过咽部面积和动态的定量视频荧光透视测量来确定。基于像素的非收缩咽部面积(PhAR)测量通常是在口服栓剂保持任务期间或吞咽后休息帧上进行的。最近对 87 名健康成年人进行的一项研究显示,平均吞咽后咽部非收缩面积为 62%(C2-4)2(范围:25%-135%),男性的咽部非收缩面积明显更大。研究发现,在首次吞咽栓剂后进行测量,而没有控制随后的清咽,是造成差异的潜在原因。一部分研究参与者完成了包括额外静态非吞咽任务在内的方案,这使我们能够在考虑到性别差异的情况下探讨这些任务的变异性:分析了 20 名健康成人(10 名男性,10 名女性,年龄 = 26 岁)在头中立位、下颏和上颏姿势、持续 /a/元音发声和口腔栓剂保持任务(1-cc、5-cc)时的视频荧光屏静态截图。训练有素的评分员使用 ImageJ 软件以 %(C2-4)2 为单位测量 PhAR。将测量结果与之前报告的同一参与者吞咽后的平均 PhAR 进行比较:(a) 探讨性别差异;(b) 配对线性混合模型方差分析 (ANOVA),将每项非吞咽任务的 PhAR 与吞咽后的测量结果进行比较,并控制性别;(c) 综合混合模型方差分析,以确认与步骤 2 中吞咽后测量结果无显著差异的任务子集的可比性:总体而言,男性参与者的 PhAR 测量值明显更大;但是,大多数成对任务比较并无性别差异。与吞咽后测量结果相比,5 毫升栓剂保持、下颏和上颏姿势以及两次重复头部中立静止拍摄中的第二次拍摄(而非第一次拍摄)均无明显差异。保持 5 毫升栓剂时的 PhAR 与吞咽后的测量结果最为相似:女性的平均值为 51 ± 13%(C2-4)2,男性为 64 ± 16%(C2-4)2:结论:男性的 PhAR 比女性大。使用 5 毫升液体栓剂进行口服栓剂保持任务所获得的测量结果与吞咽后静止帧所获得的测量结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preliminary Exploration of Variations in Measures of Pharyngeal Area During Nonswallowing Tasks.

Purpose: Age- and disease-related changes in oropharyngeal anatomy and physiology may be identified through quantitative videofluoroscopic measures of pharyngeal area and dynamics. Pixel-based measures of nonconstricted pharyngeal area (PhAR) are typically taken during oral bolus hold tasks or on postswallow rest frames. A recent study in 87 healthy adults reported mean postswallow PhAR of 62%(C2-4)2, (range: 25%-135%), and significantly larger PhAR in males. The fact that measures were taken after initial bolus swallows without controlling for the presence of subsequent clearing swallows was identified as a potential source of variation. A subset of study participants had completed a protocol including additional static nonswallowing tasks, enabling us to explore variability across those tasks, taking sex differences into account.

Method: Videofluoroscopy still shots were analyzed for 20 healthy adults (10 males, 10 females, Mage = 26 years) in head-neutral position, chin-down and chin-up positions, a sustained /a/ vowel vocalization, and oral bolus hold tasks (1-cc, 5-cc). Trained raters used ImageJ software to measure PhAR in %(C2-4)2 units. Measures were compared to previously reported mean postswallow PhAR for the same participants: (a) explorations of sex differences; (b) pairwise linear mixed-model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) of PhAR for each nonswallowing task versus postswallow measures, controlling for sex; and (c) a combined mixed-model ANOVA to confirm comparability of the subset of tasks showing no significant differences from postswallow measures in Step 2.

Results: Overall, PhAR measures were significantly larger in male participants; however, most pairwise task comparisons did not differ by sex. No significant differences from postswallow measures were seen for 5-cc bolus hold, chin-down and chin-up postures, and the second (but not the first) of two repeated head neutral still shots. PhAR during a 5-cc bolus hold was most similar to postswallow measures: mean ± standard deviation of 51 ± 13%(C2-4)2 in females and 64 ± 16%(C2-4)2 in males.

Conclusions: PhAR is larger in men than in women. Oral bolus hold tasks with a 5-cc liquid bolus yield similar measures to those obtained from postswallow rest frames.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
期刊最新文献
A Methodological Review of Stimuli Used for Classroom Speech-in-Noise Tests. Cochlear Implant Sound Quality. Aerodynamic Threshold Measures for Reflecting Glottal Closure in Voice Disorders. Characterizing Physiologic Swallowing Impairment Profiles: A Large-Scale Exploratory Study of Head and Neck Cancer, Stroke, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dementia, and Parkinson's Disease. Linguistic Markers of Subtle Cognitive Impairment in Connected Speech: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1