{"title":"匹配吗?德国多公寓建筑中的智能家居能源管理技术和用户舒适度实践","authors":"Simon Moeller","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy-savings from smart home technologies (SHT) are a topic of considerable debate: While proponents of SHT emphasise the potential to reduce heating energy consumption and facilitate energy flexibility, critics highlight real-world challenges and a lack of evidence of actual savings. This study provides insights into SHT's actual saving potential and reveals essential mechanisms of occupant-technology interaction.</div><div>Based on social practice theory, this paper explores how occupants integrate SHT into their everyday comfort practices. Furthermore, it assesses the resulting impacts on heating energy consumption and compares these interactions to those within conventional building settings. The interactions with a pilot SHT are evaluated in 137 apartments in two newly constructed multi-apartment buildings. For comparison, a survey of households in conventional buildings, which vary in age, size and heating demand, is analysed. The case study employs a mixed-methods approach, based on standardised surveys, house tours, and measurement data, including metered energy consumption and indoor temperatures.</div><div>The findings suggest that households in conventional German buildings have become accustomed to temperature variations within apartments. However, a preference for thermal variation appears to conflict with the dominant features of SHT, which, as this study implies, tend to produce more homogeneous indoor temperatures. The study identifies four distinct interaction patterns based on an in-depth analysis of heating comfort practices. These patterns vary in how well material settings align with comfort practices, ranging from low to high efficiency. The results indicate that SHT does not offer a ‘matching’ one-size-fits-all solution for residents' diverse needs and heating demands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103794"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it a match? Smart home energy management technologies and user comfort practices in German multi-apartment buildings\",\"authors\":\"Simon Moeller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Energy-savings from smart home technologies (SHT) are a topic of considerable debate: While proponents of SHT emphasise the potential to reduce heating energy consumption and facilitate energy flexibility, critics highlight real-world challenges and a lack of evidence of actual savings. This study provides insights into SHT's actual saving potential and reveals essential mechanisms of occupant-technology interaction.</div><div>Based on social practice theory, this paper explores how occupants integrate SHT into their everyday comfort practices. Furthermore, it assesses the resulting impacts on heating energy consumption and compares these interactions to those within conventional building settings. The interactions with a pilot SHT are evaluated in 137 apartments in two newly constructed multi-apartment buildings. For comparison, a survey of households in conventional buildings, which vary in age, size and heating demand, is analysed. The case study employs a mixed-methods approach, based on standardised surveys, house tours, and measurement data, including metered energy consumption and indoor temperatures.</div><div>The findings suggest that households in conventional German buildings have become accustomed to temperature variations within apartments. However, a preference for thermal variation appears to conflict with the dominant features of SHT, which, as this study implies, tend to produce more homogeneous indoor temperatures. The study identifies four distinct interaction patterns based on an in-depth analysis of heating comfort practices. These patterns vary in how well material settings align with comfort practices, ranging from low to high efficiency. The results indicate that SHT does not offer a ‘matching’ one-size-fits-all solution for residents' diverse needs and heating demands.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103794\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003852\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003852","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is it a match? Smart home energy management technologies and user comfort practices in German multi-apartment buildings
Energy-savings from smart home technologies (SHT) are a topic of considerable debate: While proponents of SHT emphasise the potential to reduce heating energy consumption and facilitate energy flexibility, critics highlight real-world challenges and a lack of evidence of actual savings. This study provides insights into SHT's actual saving potential and reveals essential mechanisms of occupant-technology interaction.
Based on social practice theory, this paper explores how occupants integrate SHT into their everyday comfort practices. Furthermore, it assesses the resulting impacts on heating energy consumption and compares these interactions to those within conventional building settings. The interactions with a pilot SHT are evaluated in 137 apartments in two newly constructed multi-apartment buildings. For comparison, a survey of households in conventional buildings, which vary in age, size and heating demand, is analysed. The case study employs a mixed-methods approach, based on standardised surveys, house tours, and measurement data, including metered energy consumption and indoor temperatures.
The findings suggest that households in conventional German buildings have become accustomed to temperature variations within apartments. However, a preference for thermal variation appears to conflict with the dominant features of SHT, which, as this study implies, tend to produce more homogeneous indoor temperatures. The study identifies four distinct interaction patterns based on an in-depth analysis of heating comfort practices. These patterns vary in how well material settings align with comfort practices, ranging from low to high efficiency. The results indicate that SHT does not offer a ‘matching’ one-size-fits-all solution for residents' diverse needs and heating demands.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.