基于遗传编程算法的钢纤维加固混凝土高温抗压强度建模应用

IF 5.3 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES Composites Part C Open Access Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100529
Mohsin Ali , Li Chen , Qadir Bux Alias Imran Latif Qureshi , Deema Mohammed Alsekait , Adil Khan , Kiran Arif , Muhammad Luqman , Diaa Salama Abd Elminaam , Amir Hamza , Majid Khan
{"title":"基于遗传编程算法的钢纤维加固混凝土高温抗压强度建模应用","authors":"Mohsin Ali ,&nbsp;Li Chen ,&nbsp;Qadir Bux Alias Imran Latif Qureshi ,&nbsp;Deema Mohammed Alsekait ,&nbsp;Adil Khan ,&nbsp;Kiran Arif ,&nbsp;Muhammad Luqman ,&nbsp;Diaa Salama Abd Elminaam ,&nbsp;Amir Hamza ,&nbsp;Majid Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Steel-fiber-reinforced concrete (SFRC) has replaced traditional concrete in the construction sector, improving fracture resistance and post-cracking performance. However, extreme temperatures degrade concrete's material characteristics including stiffness and strength. The construction industry increasingly embraces machine learning (ML) to estimate concrete properties and optimize cost and time accurately. This study employs independent ML methods, gene expression programming (GEP), multi-expression programming (MEP), XGBoost, and Bayesian estimation model (BES) to predict SFRC compressive strength (CS) at high temperatures. 307 experimental data points from published studies were utilized to develop the models. The models were trained using 70 % of the dataset, with 15 % for validation and 15 % for testing. Iterative hyperparameter adjustment and trial-and-error refining achieved optimum predictions. All the models were evaluated using correlation (R) values for training, validation, and testing datasets. MEP showed slightly lower R-values of 0.923, 0.904, and 0.949 than GEP, which performed consistently with 0.963, 0.967, and 0.961. XGBoost had the greatest training R-value of 0.997 but dropped in validation (0.918) and testing (0.896). BES model exhibited commendable performance with scores of 0.986, 0.944, and 0.897. GEP and XGBoost exhibited great accuracy, with GEP sustaining constant accuracy across all datasets, highlighting its potency in predicting CS. Interpreting model predictions using SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) highlighted temperature over heating rate. CS improved significantly as the steel fiber volume fraction (Vf) reached 1.5 %, plateauing thereafter. The proposed models are valid and accurate, providing designers and builders with a practical and adaptable method for estimating strength in SFRC structural applications, particularly under high-temperature conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34525,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part C Open Access","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100529"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic programming-based algorithms application in modeling the compressive strength of steel fiber-reinforced concrete exposed to elevated temperatures\",\"authors\":\"Mohsin Ali ,&nbsp;Li Chen ,&nbsp;Qadir Bux Alias Imran Latif Qureshi ,&nbsp;Deema Mohammed Alsekait ,&nbsp;Adil Khan ,&nbsp;Kiran Arif ,&nbsp;Muhammad Luqman ,&nbsp;Diaa Salama Abd Elminaam ,&nbsp;Amir Hamza ,&nbsp;Majid Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Steel-fiber-reinforced concrete (SFRC) has replaced traditional concrete in the construction sector, improving fracture resistance and post-cracking performance. However, extreme temperatures degrade concrete's material characteristics including stiffness and strength. The construction industry increasingly embraces machine learning (ML) to estimate concrete properties and optimize cost and time accurately. This study employs independent ML methods, gene expression programming (GEP), multi-expression programming (MEP), XGBoost, and Bayesian estimation model (BES) to predict SFRC compressive strength (CS) at high temperatures. 307 experimental data points from published studies were utilized to develop the models. The models were trained using 70 % of the dataset, with 15 % for validation and 15 % for testing. Iterative hyperparameter adjustment and trial-and-error refining achieved optimum predictions. All the models were evaluated using correlation (R) values for training, validation, and testing datasets. MEP showed slightly lower R-values of 0.923, 0.904, and 0.949 than GEP, which performed consistently with 0.963, 0.967, and 0.961. XGBoost had the greatest training R-value of 0.997 but dropped in validation (0.918) and testing (0.896). BES model exhibited commendable performance with scores of 0.986, 0.944, and 0.897. GEP and XGBoost exhibited great accuracy, with GEP sustaining constant accuracy across all datasets, highlighting its potency in predicting CS. Interpreting model predictions using SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) highlighted temperature over heating rate. CS improved significantly as the steel fiber volume fraction (Vf) reached 1.5 %, plateauing thereafter. The proposed models are valid and accurate, providing designers and builders with a practical and adaptable method for estimating strength in SFRC structural applications, particularly under high-temperature conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Composites Part C Open Access\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Composites Part C Open Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682024000987\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part C Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682024000987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在建筑领域,钢纤维增强混凝土(SFRC)已经取代了传统混凝土,提高了抗断裂性能和开裂后性能。然而,极端温度会降低混凝土的材料特性,包括刚度和强度。建筑行业越来越多地采用机器学习(ML)来估算混凝土特性,并准确优化成本和时间。本研究采用独立的 ML 方法、基因表达编程(GEP)、多表达编程(MEP)、XGBoost 和贝叶斯估计模型(BES)来预测 SFRC 在高温下的抗压强度(CS)。模型的开发利用了已发表研究中的 307 个实验数据点。模型使用 70% 的数据集进行训练,其中 15% 用于验证,15% 用于测试。迭代超参数调整和试错改进实现了最佳预测。所有模型都使用训练、验证和测试数据集的相关性(R)值进行评估。MEP 的 R 值分别为 0.923、0.904 和 0.949,略低于 GEP,后者的 R 值分别为 0.963、0.967 和 0.961。XGBoost 的训练 R 值最大,为 0.997,但在验证(0.918)和测试(0.896)中有所下降。BES 模型的表现值得称赞,得分分别为 0.986、0.944 和 0.897。GEP 和 XGBoost 表现出了极高的准确性,其中 GEP 在所有数据集上都保持了恒定的准确性,突出了其预测 CS 的能力。使用 SHapley Additive exPlanation(SHAP)解释模型预测结果时,温度比加热速率更重要。当钢纤维体积分数(Vf)达到 1.5 % 时,CS 得到明显改善,之后趋于平稳。所提出的模型有效且准确,为设计人员和建筑商提供了一种实用且适应性强的方法,用于估算 SFRC 结构应用中的强度,尤其是高温条件下的强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genetic programming-based algorithms application in modeling the compressive strength of steel fiber-reinforced concrete exposed to elevated temperatures
Steel-fiber-reinforced concrete (SFRC) has replaced traditional concrete in the construction sector, improving fracture resistance and post-cracking performance. However, extreme temperatures degrade concrete's material characteristics including stiffness and strength. The construction industry increasingly embraces machine learning (ML) to estimate concrete properties and optimize cost and time accurately. This study employs independent ML methods, gene expression programming (GEP), multi-expression programming (MEP), XGBoost, and Bayesian estimation model (BES) to predict SFRC compressive strength (CS) at high temperatures. 307 experimental data points from published studies were utilized to develop the models. The models were trained using 70 % of the dataset, with 15 % for validation and 15 % for testing. Iterative hyperparameter adjustment and trial-and-error refining achieved optimum predictions. All the models were evaluated using correlation (R) values for training, validation, and testing datasets. MEP showed slightly lower R-values of 0.923, 0.904, and 0.949 than GEP, which performed consistently with 0.963, 0.967, and 0.961. XGBoost had the greatest training R-value of 0.997 but dropped in validation (0.918) and testing (0.896). BES model exhibited commendable performance with scores of 0.986, 0.944, and 0.897. GEP and XGBoost exhibited great accuracy, with GEP sustaining constant accuracy across all datasets, highlighting its potency in predicting CS. Interpreting model predictions using SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) highlighted temperature over heating rate. CS improved significantly as the steel fiber volume fraction (Vf) reached 1.5 %, plateauing thereafter. The proposed models are valid and accurate, providing designers and builders with a practical and adaptable method for estimating strength in SFRC structural applications, particularly under high-temperature conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Composites Part C Open Access
Composites Part C Open Access Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
96
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Hybrid lattice structure with micro graphite filler manufactured via additive manufacturing and growth foam polyurethane Cure-induced residual stresses and viscoelastic effects in repaired wind turbine blades: Analytical-numerical investigation Bioinspired surface modification of mussel shells and their application as a biogenic filler in polypropylene composites A review of repairing heat-damaged RC beams using externally bonded- and near-surface mounted-CFRP composites Comparative analysis of delamination resistance in CFRP laminates interleaved by thermoplastic nanoparticle: Evaluating toughening mechanisms in modes I and II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1