气候变化下的综合经济损失和动态碳税的作用:动态一般均衡模型

IF 7.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Analysis and Policy Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.eap.2024.10.025
Huai Deng , Xianhua Wu , Hui Xu , Dawei Zhang
{"title":"气候变化下的综合经济损失和动态碳税的作用:动态一般均衡模型","authors":"Huai Deng ,&nbsp;Xianhua Wu ,&nbsp;Hui Xu ,&nbsp;Dawei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2024.10.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A rational assessment of the aggregated economic damages and a more effective carbon tax are crucial for climate governance. However, existing studies still under-recognize the utility damages and dynamic carbon taxes. In this study, we construct a multi-regional dynamic general equilibrium model considering both production and utility damages. Then, this paper re-estimates the regional aggregated economic damages reasonably (including utility damages) and compares in detail the role of static carbon tax, dynamic carbon tax and regionally optimal dynamic carbon tax (RCT). We found that: (1) As climate change intensifies, the world will suffer &gt;8 % of production damage and 1 % of utility damage by the end of the 21st century. Of these, the US and China face more pronounced economic damage. (2) If the carbon tax is implemented only in some regions, other regions will have a “free rider” benefit. An environmentally friendly dynamic carbon tax (fast and then slow) would be more effective, giving economies room to adapt to the carbon tax. The risk of exacerbating global inequality needs to be guarded against when using carbon tax. (3) Based on the regional social cost of carbon (R-SCC), implementing RCT is most effective for curbing climate change and achieving warming targets. This paper contributes to improving the understanding of assessing regional economic damage from climate change and recognizing the role of dynamic carbon tax.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"84 ","pages":"Pages 1099-1119"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aggregated economic damages and the role of dynamic carbon tax under climate change: A dynamic general equilibrium model\",\"authors\":\"Huai Deng ,&nbsp;Xianhua Wu ,&nbsp;Hui Xu ,&nbsp;Dawei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eap.2024.10.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A rational assessment of the aggregated economic damages and a more effective carbon tax are crucial for climate governance. However, existing studies still under-recognize the utility damages and dynamic carbon taxes. In this study, we construct a multi-regional dynamic general equilibrium model considering both production and utility damages. Then, this paper re-estimates the regional aggregated economic damages reasonably (including utility damages) and compares in detail the role of static carbon tax, dynamic carbon tax and regionally optimal dynamic carbon tax (RCT). We found that: (1) As climate change intensifies, the world will suffer &gt;8 % of production damage and 1 % of utility damage by the end of the 21st century. Of these, the US and China face more pronounced economic damage. (2) If the carbon tax is implemented only in some regions, other regions will have a “free rider” benefit. An environmentally friendly dynamic carbon tax (fast and then slow) would be more effective, giving economies room to adapt to the carbon tax. The risk of exacerbating global inequality needs to be guarded against when using carbon tax. (3) Based on the regional social cost of carbon (R-SCC), implementing RCT is most effective for curbing climate change and achieving warming targets. This paper contributes to improving the understanding of assessing regional economic damage from climate change and recognizing the role of dynamic carbon tax.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1099-1119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624002807\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624002807","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

合理评估综合经济损失和征收更有效的碳税对气候治理至关重要。然而,现有研究对效用损失和动态碳税的认识仍然不足。在本研究中,我们构建了一个同时考虑生产和效用损失的多区域动态一般均衡模型。然后,本文重新合理估计了区域综合经济损失(包括效用损失),并详细比较了静态碳税、动态碳税和区域最优动态碳税(RCT)的作用。我们发现(1)随着气候变化的加剧,到 21 世纪末,全球将遭受 8%的生产损失和 1%的公用事业损失。其中,美国和中国面临的经济损失更为明显。(2)如果只在部分地区征收碳税,其他地区将获得 "搭便车 "的好处。环境友好型的动态碳税(先快后慢)会更有效,给各经济体适应碳税的空间。在使用碳税时,需要防范加剧全球不平等的风险。(3) 基于地区碳社会成本(R-SCC),实施地区碳税对遏制气候变化和实现气候变暖目标最为有效。本文有助于加深对气候变化区域经济损失评估的理解,并认识到动态碳税的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aggregated economic damages and the role of dynamic carbon tax under climate change: A dynamic general equilibrium model
A rational assessment of the aggregated economic damages and a more effective carbon tax are crucial for climate governance. However, existing studies still under-recognize the utility damages and dynamic carbon taxes. In this study, we construct a multi-regional dynamic general equilibrium model considering both production and utility damages. Then, this paper re-estimates the regional aggregated economic damages reasonably (including utility damages) and compares in detail the role of static carbon tax, dynamic carbon tax and regionally optimal dynamic carbon tax (RCT). We found that: (1) As climate change intensifies, the world will suffer >8 % of production damage and 1 % of utility damage by the end of the 21st century. Of these, the US and China face more pronounced economic damage. (2) If the carbon tax is implemented only in some regions, other regions will have a “free rider” benefit. An environmentally friendly dynamic carbon tax (fast and then slow) would be more effective, giving economies room to adapt to the carbon tax. The risk of exacerbating global inequality needs to be guarded against when using carbon tax. (3) Based on the regional social cost of carbon (R-SCC), implementing RCT is most effective for curbing climate change and achieving warming targets. This paper contributes to improving the understanding of assessing regional economic damage from climate change and recognizing the role of dynamic carbon tax.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
期刊最新文献
From restriction to relaxation: The impact of fertility policy on household savings across countries Issuance of urban investment bonds and high-quality urban economic development Beyond the ivory tower: Professors on the board and corporate performance in China Does the incentive policy for renewable energy grid connection affect the technical efficiency of power grid companies? Empirical analysis based on China and Japan Reformation of government officials’ performance evaluation and corporate environmental investment: The moderating effect of corporate bargaining power
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1