Alexandre Rodrigues Ribeiro, Kauanna Uyara Devens, Franciele Pereira Camargo, Isabel Kimiko Sakamoto, Maria Bernadete Amâncio Varesche, Edson Luiz Silva
{"title":"嗜热甘蔗渣和糖蜜处理中的能源潜力洞察:两级协同消化是否能提高操作性能?","authors":"Alexandre Rodrigues Ribeiro, Kauanna Uyara Devens, Franciele Pereira Camargo, Isabel Kimiko Sakamoto, Maria Bernadete Amâncio Varesche, Edson Luiz Silva","doi":"10.1007/s10532-024-10097-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study evaluated the performance of thermophilic co-digestion in both single-stage methanogenic reactors (TMR) and two-stage systems, consisting of a thermophilic acidogenic reactor and a thermophilic sequential methanogenic reactor (TSMR). A 1:1 mixture of sugarcane vinasse and molasses was codigested in anaerobic fluidized bed reactors, with varying organic matter concentrations based on chemical oxygen demand (COD) ranging from 5 to 22.5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>. Both systems achieved high organic matter removal efficiency (51 to 86.5%) and similar methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) yields (> 148 mL CH<sub>4</sub> g<sup>−1</sup>COD<sub>removed</sub>). However, at the highest substrate concentration (22.5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>), the TSMR outperformed the TMR in terms of energy generation potential (205.6 kJ d<sup>−1</sup> vs. 125 kJ d<sup>−1</sup>). Phase separation in the two-stage system increased bioenergy generation by up to 43.5% at lower substrate concentrations (7.5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>), with hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) generation playing a critical role in this enhancement. Additionally, the two-stage system produced value-added products, including ethanol (2.3 g L<sup>−1</sup>), volatile organic acids (3.2 g lactate L<sup>−1</sup>), and H<sub>2</sub> (0.6–2.7 L H<sub>2</sub> L<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>). Microbial analysis revealed that <i>Thermoanaerobacterium</i>, <i>Caldanaerobius</i>, and <i>Clostridium</i> were dominant at 5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>, while <i>Lactobacillus</i> prevailed at concentrations of ≥ 15 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>. The primary methane producers in the single-stage system were <i>Methanosarcina</i>, <i>Methanoculleus</i>, and <i>Methanobacterium</i>, whereas <i>Methanothermobacter</i>, <i>Bathyarchaeia</i>, and <i>Methanosarcina</i> dominated in the two-stage system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":486,"journal":{"name":"Biodegradation","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights of energy potential in thermophilic sugarcane vinasse and molasses treatment: does two-stage codigestion enhance operational performance?\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Rodrigues Ribeiro, Kauanna Uyara Devens, Franciele Pereira Camargo, Isabel Kimiko Sakamoto, Maria Bernadete Amâncio Varesche, Edson Luiz Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10532-024-10097-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The study evaluated the performance of thermophilic co-digestion in both single-stage methanogenic reactors (TMR) and two-stage systems, consisting of a thermophilic acidogenic reactor and a thermophilic sequential methanogenic reactor (TSMR). A 1:1 mixture of sugarcane vinasse and molasses was codigested in anaerobic fluidized bed reactors, with varying organic matter concentrations based on chemical oxygen demand (COD) ranging from 5 to 22.5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>. Both systems achieved high organic matter removal efficiency (51 to 86.5%) and similar methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) yields (> 148 mL CH<sub>4</sub> g<sup>−1</sup>COD<sub>removed</sub>). However, at the highest substrate concentration (22.5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>), the TSMR outperformed the TMR in terms of energy generation potential (205.6 kJ d<sup>−1</sup> vs. 125 kJ d<sup>−1</sup>). Phase separation in the two-stage system increased bioenergy generation by up to 43.5% at lower substrate concentrations (7.5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>), with hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) generation playing a critical role in this enhancement. Additionally, the two-stage system produced value-added products, including ethanol (2.3 g L<sup>−1</sup>), volatile organic acids (3.2 g lactate L<sup>−1</sup>), and H<sub>2</sub> (0.6–2.7 L H<sub>2</sub> L<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>). Microbial analysis revealed that <i>Thermoanaerobacterium</i>, <i>Caldanaerobius</i>, and <i>Clostridium</i> were dominant at 5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>, while <i>Lactobacillus</i> prevailed at concentrations of ≥ 15 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>. The primary methane producers in the single-stage system were <i>Methanosarcina</i>, <i>Methanoculleus</i>, and <i>Methanobacterium</i>, whereas <i>Methanothermobacter</i>, <i>Bathyarchaeia</i>, and <i>Methanosarcina</i> dominated in the two-stage system.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biodegradation\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biodegradation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10532-024-10097-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodegradation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10532-024-10097-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
该研究评估了单级产甲烷反应器(TMR)和由嗜热产酸反应器和嗜热顺序产甲烷反应器(TSMR)组成的双级系统中的嗜热协同消化性能。甘蔗渣和糖蜜的 1:1 混合物在厌氧流化床反应器中进行消化,有机物浓度根据化学需氧量(COD)从 5 克 COD L-1 到 22.5 克 COD L-1 不等。两种系统都达到了较高的有机物去除效率(51% 至 86.5%)和相似的甲烷(CH4)产量(148 mL CH4 g-1CODremoved)。不过,在底物浓度最高时(22.5 g COD L-1),TSMR 的能量生成潜力(205.6 kJ d-1 对 125 kJ d-1)优于 TMR。在底物浓度较低(7.5 g COD L-1)的情况下,两级系统中的相分离将生物能的产生量提高了 43.5%,其中氢气 (H2) 的产生在这一提高中起到了关键作用。此外,两阶段系统还产生了增值产品,包括乙醇(2.3 g L-1)、挥发性有机酸(3.2 g lactate L-1)和 H2(0.6-2.7 L H2 L-1 d-1)。微生物分析表明,当 COD 浓度为 5 g L-1 时,Thermoanaerobacterium、Caldanaerobius 和 Clostridium 占优势,而当 COD 浓度≥ 15 g L-1 时,乳酸杆菌占优势。在单级系统中,主要的甲烷生产者为 Methanosarcina、Methanoculleus 和 Methanobacterium,而在双级系统中则以 Methanothermobacter、Bathyarchaeia 和 Methanosarcina 为主。
Insights of energy potential in thermophilic sugarcane vinasse and molasses treatment: does two-stage codigestion enhance operational performance?
The study evaluated the performance of thermophilic co-digestion in both single-stage methanogenic reactors (TMR) and two-stage systems, consisting of a thermophilic acidogenic reactor and a thermophilic sequential methanogenic reactor (TSMR). A 1:1 mixture of sugarcane vinasse and molasses was codigested in anaerobic fluidized bed reactors, with varying organic matter concentrations based on chemical oxygen demand (COD) ranging from 5 to 22.5 g COD L−1. Both systems achieved high organic matter removal efficiency (51 to 86.5%) and similar methane (CH4) yields (> 148 mL CH4 g−1CODremoved). However, at the highest substrate concentration (22.5 g COD L−1), the TSMR outperformed the TMR in terms of energy generation potential (205.6 kJ d−1 vs. 125 kJ d−1). Phase separation in the two-stage system increased bioenergy generation by up to 43.5% at lower substrate concentrations (7.5 g COD L−1), with hydrogen (H2) generation playing a critical role in this enhancement. Additionally, the two-stage system produced value-added products, including ethanol (2.3 g L−1), volatile organic acids (3.2 g lactate L−1), and H2 (0.6–2.7 L H2 L−1 d−1). Microbial analysis revealed that Thermoanaerobacterium, Caldanaerobius, and Clostridium were dominant at 5 g COD L−1, while Lactobacillus prevailed at concentrations of ≥ 15 g COD L−1. The primary methane producers in the single-stage system were Methanosarcina, Methanoculleus, and Methanobacterium, whereas Methanothermobacter, Bathyarchaeia, and Methanosarcina dominated in the two-stage system.
期刊介绍:
Biodegradation publishes papers, reviews and mini-reviews on the biotransformation, mineralization, detoxification, recycling, amelioration or treatment of chemicals or waste materials by naturally-occurring microbial strains, microbial associations, or recombinant organisms.
Coverage spans a range of topics, including Biochemistry of biodegradative pathways; Genetics of biodegradative organisms and development of recombinant biodegrading organisms; Molecular biology-based studies of biodegradative microbial communities; Enhancement of naturally-occurring biodegradative properties and activities. Also featured are novel applications of biodegradation and biotransformation technology, to soil, water, sewage, heavy metals and radionuclides, organohalogens, high-COD wastes, straight-, branched-chain and aromatic hydrocarbons; Coverage extends to design and scale-up of laboratory processes and bioreactor systems. Also offered are papers on economic and legal aspects of biological treatment of waste.