Alexandre Rodrigues Ribeiro, Kauanna Uyara Devens, Franciele Pereira Camargo, Isabel Kimiko Sakamoto, Maria Bernadete Amâncio Varesche, Edson Luiz Silva
{"title":"Insights of energy potential in thermophilic sugarcane vinasse and molasses treatment: does two-stage codigestion enhance operational performance?","authors":"Alexandre Rodrigues Ribeiro, Kauanna Uyara Devens, Franciele Pereira Camargo, Isabel Kimiko Sakamoto, Maria Bernadete Amâncio Varesche, Edson Luiz Silva","doi":"10.1007/s10532-024-10097-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study evaluated the performance of thermophilic co-digestion in both single-stage methanogenic reactors (TMR) and two-stage systems, consisting of a thermophilic acidogenic reactor and a thermophilic sequential methanogenic reactor (TSMR). A 1:1 mixture of sugarcane vinasse and molasses was codigested in anaerobic fluidized bed reactors, with varying organic matter concentrations based on chemical oxygen demand (COD) ranging from 5 to 22.5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>. Both systems achieved high organic matter removal efficiency (51 to 86.5%) and similar methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) yields (> 148 mL CH<sub>4</sub> g<sup>−1</sup>COD<sub>removed</sub>). However, at the highest substrate concentration (22.5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>), the TSMR outperformed the TMR in terms of energy generation potential (205.6 kJ d<sup>−1</sup> vs. 125 kJ d<sup>−1</sup>). Phase separation in the two-stage system increased bioenergy generation by up to 43.5% at lower substrate concentrations (7.5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>), with hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) generation playing a critical role in this enhancement. Additionally, the two-stage system produced value-added products, including ethanol (2.3 g L<sup>−1</sup>), volatile organic acids (3.2 g lactate L<sup>−1</sup>), and H<sub>2</sub> (0.6–2.7 L H<sub>2</sub> L<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>). Microbial analysis revealed that <i>Thermoanaerobacterium</i>, <i>Caldanaerobius</i>, and <i>Clostridium</i> were dominant at 5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>, while <i>Lactobacillus</i> prevailed at concentrations of ≥ 15 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>. The primary methane producers in the single-stage system were <i>Methanosarcina</i>, <i>Methanoculleus</i>, and <i>Methanobacterium</i>, whereas <i>Methanothermobacter</i>, <i>Bathyarchaeia</i>, and <i>Methanosarcina</i> dominated in the two-stage system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":486,"journal":{"name":"Biodegradation","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodegradation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10532-024-10097-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study evaluated the performance of thermophilic co-digestion in both single-stage methanogenic reactors (TMR) and two-stage systems, consisting of a thermophilic acidogenic reactor and a thermophilic sequential methanogenic reactor (TSMR). A 1:1 mixture of sugarcane vinasse and molasses was codigested in anaerobic fluidized bed reactors, with varying organic matter concentrations based on chemical oxygen demand (COD) ranging from 5 to 22.5 g COD L−1. Both systems achieved high organic matter removal efficiency (51 to 86.5%) and similar methane (CH4) yields (> 148 mL CH4 g−1CODremoved). However, at the highest substrate concentration (22.5 g COD L−1), the TSMR outperformed the TMR in terms of energy generation potential (205.6 kJ d−1 vs. 125 kJ d−1). Phase separation in the two-stage system increased bioenergy generation by up to 43.5% at lower substrate concentrations (7.5 g COD L−1), with hydrogen (H2) generation playing a critical role in this enhancement. Additionally, the two-stage system produced value-added products, including ethanol (2.3 g L−1), volatile organic acids (3.2 g lactate L−1), and H2 (0.6–2.7 L H2 L−1 d−1). Microbial analysis revealed that Thermoanaerobacterium, Caldanaerobius, and Clostridium were dominant at 5 g COD L−1, while Lactobacillus prevailed at concentrations of ≥ 15 g COD L−1. The primary methane producers in the single-stage system were Methanosarcina, Methanoculleus, and Methanobacterium, whereas Methanothermobacter, Bathyarchaeia, and Methanosarcina dominated in the two-stage system.
期刊介绍:
Biodegradation publishes papers, reviews and mini-reviews on the biotransformation, mineralization, detoxification, recycling, amelioration or treatment of chemicals or waste materials by naturally-occurring microbial strains, microbial associations, or recombinant organisms.
Coverage spans a range of topics, including Biochemistry of biodegradative pathways; Genetics of biodegradative organisms and development of recombinant biodegrading organisms; Molecular biology-based studies of biodegradative microbial communities; Enhancement of naturally-occurring biodegradative properties and activities. Also featured are novel applications of biodegradation and biotransformation technology, to soil, water, sewage, heavy metals and radionuclides, organohalogens, high-COD wastes, straight-, branched-chain and aromatic hydrocarbons; Coverage extends to design and scale-up of laboratory processes and bioreactor systems. Also offered are papers on economic and legal aspects of biological treatment of waste.