Insights of energy potential in thermophilic sugarcane vinasse and molasses treatment: does two-stage codigestion enhance operational performance?

IF 3.1 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biodegradation Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1007/s10532-024-10097-y
Alexandre Rodrigues Ribeiro, Kauanna Uyara Devens, Franciele Pereira Camargo, Isabel Kimiko Sakamoto, Maria Bernadete Amâncio Varesche, Edson Luiz Silva
{"title":"Insights of energy potential in thermophilic sugarcane vinasse and molasses treatment: does two-stage codigestion enhance operational performance?","authors":"Alexandre Rodrigues Ribeiro,&nbsp;Kauanna Uyara Devens,&nbsp;Franciele Pereira Camargo,&nbsp;Isabel Kimiko Sakamoto,&nbsp;Maria Bernadete Amâncio Varesche,&nbsp;Edson Luiz Silva","doi":"10.1007/s10532-024-10097-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study evaluated the performance of thermophilic co-digestion in both single-stage methanogenic reactors (TMR) and two-stage systems, consisting of a thermophilic acidogenic reactor and a thermophilic sequential methanogenic reactor (TSMR). A 1:1 mixture of sugarcane vinasse and molasses was codigested in anaerobic fluidized bed reactors, with varying organic matter concentrations based on chemical oxygen demand (COD) ranging from 5 to 22.5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>. Both systems achieved high organic matter removal efficiency (51 to 86.5%) and similar methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) yields (&gt; 148 mL CH<sub>4</sub> g<sup>−1</sup>COD<sub>removed</sub>). However, at the highest substrate concentration (22.5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>), the TSMR outperformed the TMR in terms of energy generation potential (205.6 kJ d<sup>−1</sup> vs. 125 kJ d<sup>−1</sup>). Phase separation in the two-stage system increased bioenergy generation by up to 43.5% at lower substrate concentrations (7.5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>), with hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) generation playing a critical role in this enhancement. Additionally, the two-stage system produced value-added products, including ethanol (2.3 g L<sup>−1</sup>), volatile organic acids (3.2 g lactate L<sup>−1</sup>), and H<sub>2</sub> (0.6–2.7 L H<sub>2</sub> L<sup>−1</sup> d<sup>−1</sup>). Microbial analysis revealed that <i>Thermoanaerobacterium</i>, <i>Caldanaerobius</i>, and <i>Clostridium</i> were dominant at 5 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>, while <i>Lactobacillus</i> prevailed at concentrations of ≥ 15 g COD L<sup>−1</sup>. The primary methane producers in the single-stage system were <i>Methanosarcina</i>, <i>Methanoculleus</i>, and <i>Methanobacterium</i>, whereas <i>Methanothermobacter</i>, <i>Bathyarchaeia</i>, and <i>Methanosarcina</i> dominated in the two-stage system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":486,"journal":{"name":"Biodegradation","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodegradation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10532-024-10097-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study evaluated the performance of thermophilic co-digestion in both single-stage methanogenic reactors (TMR) and two-stage systems, consisting of a thermophilic acidogenic reactor and a thermophilic sequential methanogenic reactor (TSMR). A 1:1 mixture of sugarcane vinasse and molasses was codigested in anaerobic fluidized bed reactors, with varying organic matter concentrations based on chemical oxygen demand (COD) ranging from 5 to 22.5 g COD L−1. Both systems achieved high organic matter removal efficiency (51 to 86.5%) and similar methane (CH4) yields (> 148 mL CH4 g−1CODremoved). However, at the highest substrate concentration (22.5 g COD L−1), the TSMR outperformed the TMR in terms of energy generation potential (205.6 kJ d−1 vs. 125 kJ d−1). Phase separation in the two-stage system increased bioenergy generation by up to 43.5% at lower substrate concentrations (7.5 g COD L−1), with hydrogen (H2) generation playing a critical role in this enhancement. Additionally, the two-stage system produced value-added products, including ethanol (2.3 g L−1), volatile organic acids (3.2 g lactate L−1), and H2 (0.6–2.7 L H2 L−1 d−1). Microbial analysis revealed that Thermoanaerobacterium, Caldanaerobius, and Clostridium were dominant at 5 g COD L−1, while Lactobacillus prevailed at concentrations of ≥ 15 g COD L−1. The primary methane producers in the single-stage system were Methanosarcina, Methanoculleus, and Methanobacterium, whereas Methanothermobacter, Bathyarchaeia, and Methanosarcina dominated in the two-stage system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗜热甘蔗渣和糖蜜处理中的能源潜力洞察:两级协同消化是否能提高操作性能?
该研究评估了单级产甲烷反应器(TMR)和由嗜热产酸反应器和嗜热顺序产甲烷反应器(TSMR)组成的双级系统中的嗜热协同消化性能。甘蔗渣和糖蜜的 1:1 混合物在厌氧流化床反应器中进行消化,有机物浓度根据化学需氧量(COD)从 5 克 COD L-1 到 22.5 克 COD L-1 不等。两种系统都达到了较高的有机物去除效率(51% 至 86.5%)和相似的甲烷(CH4)产量(148 mL CH4 g-1CODremoved)。不过,在底物浓度最高时(22.5 g COD L-1),TSMR 的能量生成潜力(205.6 kJ d-1 对 125 kJ d-1)优于 TMR。在底物浓度较低(7.5 g COD L-1)的情况下,两级系统中的相分离将生物能的产生量提高了 43.5%,其中氢气 (H2) 的产生在这一提高中起到了关键作用。此外,两阶段系统还产生了增值产品,包括乙醇(2.3 g L-1)、挥发性有机酸(3.2 g lactate L-1)和 H2(0.6-2.7 L H2 L-1 d-1)。微生物分析表明,当 COD 浓度为 5 g L-1 时,Thermoanaerobacterium、Caldanaerobius 和 Clostridium 占优势,而当 COD 浓度≥ 15 g L-1 时,乳酸杆菌占优势。在单级系统中,主要的甲烷生产者为 Methanosarcina、Methanoculleus 和 Methanobacterium,而在双级系统中则以 Methanothermobacter、Bathyarchaeia 和 Methanosarcina 为主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biodegradation
Biodegradation 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Biodegradation publishes papers, reviews and mini-reviews on the biotransformation, mineralization, detoxification, recycling, amelioration or treatment of chemicals or waste materials by naturally-occurring microbial strains, microbial associations, or recombinant organisms. Coverage spans a range of topics, including Biochemistry of biodegradative pathways; Genetics of biodegradative organisms and development of recombinant biodegrading organisms; Molecular biology-based studies of biodegradative microbial communities; Enhancement of naturally-occurring biodegradative properties and activities. Also featured are novel applications of biodegradation and biotransformation technology, to soil, water, sewage, heavy metals and radionuclides, organohalogens, high-COD wastes, straight-, branched-chain and aromatic hydrocarbons; Coverage extends to design and scale-up of laboratory processes and bioreactor systems. Also offered are papers on economic and legal aspects of biological treatment of waste.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of microbial community dynamics and chlorinated solvent biodegradation in methane-amended microcosms from an acidic aquifer. Disentangling the microbial genomic traits associated with aromatic hydrocarbon degradation in a jet fuel-contaminated aquifer Revolutionizing dairy waste: emerging solutions in conjunction with microbial engineering Isolation and purification of esterase enzyme from marine bacteria associated with biodegradation of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) Insights of energy potential in thermophilic sugarcane vinasse and molasses treatment: does two-stage codigestion enhance operational performance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1