评估牙科学生使用不同注射器系统进行椎管内麻醉的学习曲线:前瞻性交叉研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Dental Education Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1002/jdd.13754
Philipp Luhrenberg, Mirjam Renders, Diana Heimes, Anke Hollinderbäumer, Sebahat Kaya, Solomiya Kyyak, Saskia V Schröger, Daniel G E Thiem, Helen Wagner, Peer W Kämmerer
{"title":"评估牙科学生使用不同注射器系统进行椎管内麻醉的学习曲线:前瞻性交叉研究。","authors":"Philipp Luhrenberg, Mirjam Renders, Diana Heimes, Anke Hollinderbäumer, Sebahat Kaya, Solomiya Kyyak, Saskia V Schröger, Daniel G E Thiem, Helen Wagner, Peer W Kämmerer","doi":"10.1002/jdd.13754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objectives: </strong>This prospective crossover preclinical trial aimed to evaluate the learning curve of dental students in successfully administering intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA) using three different syringe systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dental students performed ILA using three devices in two separate sessions, each targeting mandibular and/or maxillary premolars. The devices included two manual systems (pistol-type and lever-based) and one computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLAD). The primary research parameter was the success rate of anesthesia, defined as the percentage of successful ILA administrations confirmed by a negative response to a cold test. Secondary parameters included pain experienced during needle penetration and injection, students' self-reported levels of mental tension and handling of the syringes, and any potential side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 110 students performed ILA on 599 teeth during the study period. When comparing the CCLAD system to the manual syringes, the CCLAD system exhibited a significantly higher overall success rate in the first session (92.5% vs. 77.4%; p < 0.001), potentially due to its precise control of anesthetic flow and pressure, which likely facilitated more effective anesthetic delivery. However, when examining the individual manual techniques, no significant difference was found between the pistol-type manual and the CCLAD system (p = 0.66). All techniques' success rate increased from the first to the second session (80.4% vs. 86.9%; p = 0.0357). Additionally, penetration pain demonstrated a significant decrease across all techniques (p < 0.01). Notably, students' anxiety levels decreased, and self-assurance increased significantly over the sessions. Undesired reversible side effects were documented in 10.9% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that repeated practice of ILA, particularly with different syringe systems, enhances anesthetic success and psychological readiness for patient interaction. Additional training sessions may further improve proficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of dental students' learning curve in intraligamentary anesthesia using different syringe systems: A prospective crossover study.\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Luhrenberg, Mirjam Renders, Diana Heimes, Anke Hollinderbäumer, Sebahat Kaya, Solomiya Kyyak, Saskia V Schröger, Daniel G E Thiem, Helen Wagner, Peer W Kämmerer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jdd.13754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose/objectives: </strong>This prospective crossover preclinical trial aimed to evaluate the learning curve of dental students in successfully administering intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA) using three different syringe systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dental students performed ILA using three devices in two separate sessions, each targeting mandibular and/or maxillary premolars. The devices included two manual systems (pistol-type and lever-based) and one computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLAD). The primary research parameter was the success rate of anesthesia, defined as the percentage of successful ILA administrations confirmed by a negative response to a cold test. Secondary parameters included pain experienced during needle penetration and injection, students' self-reported levels of mental tension and handling of the syringes, and any potential side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 110 students performed ILA on 599 teeth during the study period. When comparing the CCLAD system to the manual syringes, the CCLAD system exhibited a significantly higher overall success rate in the first session (92.5% vs. 77.4%; p < 0.001), potentially due to its precise control of anesthetic flow and pressure, which likely facilitated more effective anesthetic delivery. However, when examining the individual manual techniques, no significant difference was found between the pistol-type manual and the CCLAD system (p = 0.66). All techniques' success rate increased from the first to the second session (80.4% vs. 86.9%; p = 0.0357). Additionally, penetration pain demonstrated a significant decrease across all techniques (p < 0.01). Notably, students' anxiety levels decreased, and self-assurance increased significantly over the sessions. Undesired reversible side effects were documented in 10.9% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that repeated practice of ILA, particularly with different syringe systems, enhances anesthetic success and psychological readiness for patient interaction. Additional training sessions may further improve proficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13754\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/目标:这项前瞻性交叉临床前试验旨在评估牙科学生使用三种不同注射器系统成功实施龈内麻醉(ILA)的学习曲线:方法: 牙科学生在两节独立的课程中使用三种设备进行椎管内麻醉,每节课的目标都是下颌和/或上颌前磨牙。这些装置包括两个手动系统(手枪式和杠杆式)和一个计算机控制的局部麻醉给药系统(CCLAD)。主要研究参数是麻醉成功率,即通过冷测试阴性反应确认的成功注射 ILA 的百分比。次要参数包括穿刺针和注射时的疼痛、学生自我报告的精神紧张程度、注射器的操作以及任何潜在的副作用:结果:在研究期间,共有 110 名学生对 599 颗牙齿进行了 ILA 操作。将 CCLAD 系统与手动注射器进行比较,CCLAD 系统在第一次治疗中的总体成功率明显更高(92.5% 对 77.4%;P 结论:这些结果表明,反复练习 ILA 可以提高学生的口腔健康水平:这些研究结果表明,反复练习 ILA,尤其是使用不同的注射器系统,可提高麻醉成功率和与患者互动的心理准备。额外的培训课程可进一步提高熟练程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of dental students' learning curve in intraligamentary anesthesia using different syringe systems: A prospective crossover study.

Purpose/objectives: This prospective crossover preclinical trial aimed to evaluate the learning curve of dental students in successfully administering intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA) using three different syringe systems.

Methods: Dental students performed ILA using three devices in two separate sessions, each targeting mandibular and/or maxillary premolars. The devices included two manual systems (pistol-type and lever-based) and one computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLAD). The primary research parameter was the success rate of anesthesia, defined as the percentage of successful ILA administrations confirmed by a negative response to a cold test. Secondary parameters included pain experienced during needle penetration and injection, students' self-reported levels of mental tension and handling of the syringes, and any potential side effects.

Results: A total of 110 students performed ILA on 599 teeth during the study period. When comparing the CCLAD system to the manual syringes, the CCLAD system exhibited a significantly higher overall success rate in the first session (92.5% vs. 77.4%; p < 0.001), potentially due to its precise control of anesthetic flow and pressure, which likely facilitated more effective anesthetic delivery. However, when examining the individual manual techniques, no significant difference was found between the pistol-type manual and the CCLAD system (p = 0.66). All techniques' success rate increased from the first to the second session (80.4% vs. 86.9%; p = 0.0357). Additionally, penetration pain demonstrated a significant decrease across all techniques (p < 0.01). Notably, students' anxiety levels decreased, and self-assurance increased significantly over the sessions. Undesired reversible side effects were documented in 10.9% of cases.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that repeated practice of ILA, particularly with different syringe systems, enhances anesthetic success and psychological readiness for patient interaction. Additional training sessions may further improve proficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Education
Journal of Dental Education 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of layered curriculum and project-based learning approaches in an oral radiological course. Can artificial intelligence develop high-quality simulated pediatric dental cases? A cross-training ergonomic exchange between the doctor of occupational therapy and dental students. Introduction of a learning pathway combining passive and interactive formats in gerodontology: A pilot study. Performance of ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4o in the Japanese National Dental Examination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1