肥胖症内科医生的职责、任务、知识和技能:实践分析

Kimberly A. Gudzune , Dana R. Brittan , Adrienne W. Cadle , Tirissa J. Reid , Edmond P. Wickham III , Judith Korner
{"title":"肥胖症内科医生的职责、任务、知识和技能:实践分析","authors":"Kimberly A. Gudzune ,&nbsp;Dana R. Brittan ,&nbsp;Adrienne W. Cadle ,&nbsp;Tirissa J. Reid ,&nbsp;Edmond P. Wickham III ,&nbsp;Judith Korner","doi":"10.1016/j.obpill.2024.100147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Given the evolving nature of obesity medicine, periodic evaluation of its clinical practice is needed to ensure that certification requirements address real-world experience. Practice analysis is a systematic approach to define a field's body of knowledge, and its results can inform the content outline and examination blueprint for a certification examination. This study describes the 2023 practice analysis conducted by the American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Initially, 14 obesity medicine physicians participated in a practice analysis panel, resulting in 3 duties and 30 tasks required for competent practice of obesity medicine physicians. Each task included steps, knowledge, skills, and abilities needed to perform the task. ABOM then recruited 645 certified obesity medicine physicians from its database to participate in a validation survey to rate the frequency [scale: never (0) to very frequently (5)] and importance [scale: not important (0) to very important (3)] of each task. Survey participants could also provide open-ended comments.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among validation survey participants (n = 645), the most common primary medical specialties reported were internal medicine (46.0 %), family medicine (33.8 %), and pediatrics (11.2 %). Years practicing obesity medicine varied with 45.3 % reporting 1–4 years, 26.0 % 5–9 years, and 28.7 % ≥ 10 years in practice. Most tasks were performed frequently (mean score ≥4.0) and rated as important (mean score ≥2.0). All tasks were retained based on the frequency and importance ratings. Survey results informed the weighting in the examination blueprint.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There was consensus among practicing ABOM-certified physicians who participated in the validation survey in the tasks required for competent obesity medicine practice. Our practice analysis approach was a structured process that engaged obesity medicine physicians and captured the breadth and depth of knowledge required for obesity medicine. The new content outline and examination blueprint developed will be implemented with the 2025 ABOM certification exam administration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100977,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Pillars","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Duties, tasks, knowledge and skills of an obesity medicine physician: A practice analysis\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly A. Gudzune ,&nbsp;Dana R. Brittan ,&nbsp;Adrienne W. Cadle ,&nbsp;Tirissa J. Reid ,&nbsp;Edmond P. Wickham III ,&nbsp;Judith Korner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.obpill.2024.100147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Given the evolving nature of obesity medicine, periodic evaluation of its clinical practice is needed to ensure that certification requirements address real-world experience. Practice analysis is a systematic approach to define a field's body of knowledge, and its results can inform the content outline and examination blueprint for a certification examination. This study describes the 2023 practice analysis conducted by the American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Initially, 14 obesity medicine physicians participated in a practice analysis panel, resulting in 3 duties and 30 tasks required for competent practice of obesity medicine physicians. Each task included steps, knowledge, skills, and abilities needed to perform the task. ABOM then recruited 645 certified obesity medicine physicians from its database to participate in a validation survey to rate the frequency [scale: never (0) to very frequently (5)] and importance [scale: not important (0) to very important (3)] of each task. Survey participants could also provide open-ended comments.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among validation survey participants (n = 645), the most common primary medical specialties reported were internal medicine (46.0 %), family medicine (33.8 %), and pediatrics (11.2 %). Years practicing obesity medicine varied with 45.3 % reporting 1–4 years, 26.0 % 5–9 years, and 28.7 % ≥ 10 years in practice. Most tasks were performed frequently (mean score ≥4.0) and rated as important (mean score ≥2.0). All tasks were retained based on the frequency and importance ratings. Survey results informed the weighting in the examination blueprint.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There was consensus among practicing ABOM-certified physicians who participated in the validation survey in the tasks required for competent obesity medicine practice. Our practice analysis approach was a structured process that engaged obesity medicine physicians and captured the breadth and depth of knowledge required for obesity medicine. The new content outline and examination blueprint developed will be implemented with the 2025 ABOM certification exam administration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Pillars\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Pillars\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667368124000494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Pillars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667368124000494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景鉴于肥胖症医学不断发展的性质,需要对其临床实践进行定期评估,以确保认证要求符合现实世界的经验。实践分析是界定一个领域知识体系的系统方法,其结果可为认证考试的内容大纲和考试蓝图提供参考。本研究描述了美国肥胖症医学委员会(ABOM)进行的 2023 年实践分析。方法最初,14 名肥胖症医学医师参加了实践分析小组,得出了肥胖症医学医师胜任实践所需的 3 项职责和 30 项任务。每项任务包括执行任务所需的步骤、知识、技能和能力。ABOM 随后从其数据库中招募了 645 名经过认证的肥胖症医学医生参与验证调查,对每项任务的频率[评分标准:从不(0)到非常频繁(5)]和重要性[评分标准:不重要(0)到非常重要(3)]进行评分。结果在验证调查的参与者(n = 645)中,最常见的主要医学专业是内科(46.0%)、家庭医学(33.8%)和儿科(11.2%)。肥胖症患者的行医年限各不相同,45.3%的患者行医 1-4 年,26.0%的患者行医 5-9 年,28.7%的患者行医 ≥ 10 年。大多数任务经常执行(平均得分≥4.0),并被评为重要任务(平均得分≥2.0)。根据频率和重要性评分,所有任务均被保留。调查结果显示了考试蓝图中的权重。结论参与验证调查的 ABOM 认证执业医师对胜任肥胖症医学实践所需的任务达成了共识。我们的实践分析方法是一个结构化的过程,让肥胖症医学医师参与其中,并掌握了肥胖症医学所需的知识广度和深度。开发的新内容大纲和考试蓝图将在 2025 年 ABOM 认证考试中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Duties, tasks, knowledge and skills of an obesity medicine physician: A practice analysis

Background

Given the evolving nature of obesity medicine, periodic evaluation of its clinical practice is needed to ensure that certification requirements address real-world experience. Practice analysis is a systematic approach to define a field's body of knowledge, and its results can inform the content outline and examination blueprint for a certification examination. This study describes the 2023 practice analysis conducted by the American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM).

Methods

Initially, 14 obesity medicine physicians participated in a practice analysis panel, resulting in 3 duties and 30 tasks required for competent practice of obesity medicine physicians. Each task included steps, knowledge, skills, and abilities needed to perform the task. ABOM then recruited 645 certified obesity medicine physicians from its database to participate in a validation survey to rate the frequency [scale: never (0) to very frequently (5)] and importance [scale: not important (0) to very important (3)] of each task. Survey participants could also provide open-ended comments.

Results

Among validation survey participants (n = 645), the most common primary medical specialties reported were internal medicine (46.0 %), family medicine (33.8 %), and pediatrics (11.2 %). Years practicing obesity medicine varied with 45.3 % reporting 1–4 years, 26.0 % 5–9 years, and 28.7 % ≥ 10 years in practice. Most tasks were performed frequently (mean score ≥4.0) and rated as important (mean score ≥2.0). All tasks were retained based on the frequency and importance ratings. Survey results informed the weighting in the examination blueprint.

Conclusion

There was consensus among practicing ABOM-certified physicians who participated in the validation survey in the tasks required for competent obesity medicine practice. Our practice analysis approach was a structured process that engaged obesity medicine physicians and captured the breadth and depth of knowledge required for obesity medicine. The new content outline and examination blueprint developed will be implemented with the 2025 ABOM certification exam administration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bariatric nutrition and evaluation of the metabolic surgical patient: Update to the 2022 Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) bariatric surgery, gastrointestinal hormones, and the microbiome clinical practice statement (CPS). Significantly higher rates of KIDINS220 polymorphisms in patients with obesity and end-stage renal disease. Obesity management in primary care: Are we adequately preparing the next generation of Canadian family physicians? Exploring parental and professional perceptions of weight management services among under-fives in England: A qualitative study Childhood obesity in South Asian population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1