利用治疗性聚焦换能器的回声振幅监测聚焦超声消融手术(FUAS)

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Medical Engineering & Physics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104247
Yufeng Zhou , Xiaobo Gong , Yaqin You
{"title":"利用治疗性聚焦换能器的回声振幅监测聚焦超声消融手术(FUAS)","authors":"Yufeng Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaobo Gong ,&nbsp;Yaqin You","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>B-mode sonography is commonly used to monitor focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS), but has limitations in sensitivity. More accurate and reliable prediction of coagulation is required.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The focused ultrasound (FUS) transducer was adapted for echo reception. Numerical simulations compared the normalized echo amplitudes from the FUS transducer and imaging probe at varying tissue depths and frequencies with a 3 mm necrosis at focus. An <em>ex vivo</em> experiment then evaluated echo changes from the FUS transducer and ultrasound imaging probe under different settings. Finally, coagulation prediction using FUS echo data was compared to sonography in a clinical <em>ex vivo</em> context.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The echo amplitudes from the FUS transducer exhibit a less pronounced decline with increasing tissue penetration depth compared to the ultrasound imaging probe. In <em>ex vivo</em> bovine liver experiments at depths of 2 cm and 4 cm, the FUS transducer detected normalized echo amplitudes that were significantly larger (i.e., 2∼3 folds) than those received by the ultrasound imaging probe. Moreover, multi-layered <em>ex vivo</em> tissue experiments that replicate clinical conditions revealed that coagulation prediction utilizing the FUS transducer's echo amplitudes achieved superior accuracy (91.2% vs. 60.3 %), sensitivity (92.1% vs. 54.5 %), and negative prediction (78.9% vs. 30.6 %), but similar specificity (88.2% vs. 84.6 %) and positive prediction (95.9% vs. 93.8 %) in comparison to sonography.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The echo amplitude of the FUS transducer serves as a sensitive and dependable metric for monitoring the FUAS outcomes. Its utilization may augment the procedure's safety and efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS) using echo amplitudes of the therapeutic focused transducer\",\"authors\":\"Yufeng Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaobo Gong ,&nbsp;Yaqin You\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>B-mode sonography is commonly used to monitor focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS), but has limitations in sensitivity. More accurate and reliable prediction of coagulation is required.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The focused ultrasound (FUS) transducer was adapted for echo reception. Numerical simulations compared the normalized echo amplitudes from the FUS transducer and imaging probe at varying tissue depths and frequencies with a 3 mm necrosis at focus. An <em>ex vivo</em> experiment then evaluated echo changes from the FUS transducer and ultrasound imaging probe under different settings. Finally, coagulation prediction using FUS echo data was compared to sonography in a clinical <em>ex vivo</em> context.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The echo amplitudes from the FUS transducer exhibit a less pronounced decline with increasing tissue penetration depth compared to the ultrasound imaging probe. In <em>ex vivo</em> bovine liver experiments at depths of 2 cm and 4 cm, the FUS transducer detected normalized echo amplitudes that were significantly larger (i.e., 2∼3 folds) than those received by the ultrasound imaging probe. Moreover, multi-layered <em>ex vivo</em> tissue experiments that replicate clinical conditions revealed that coagulation prediction utilizing the FUS transducer's echo amplitudes achieved superior accuracy (91.2% vs. 60.3 %), sensitivity (92.1% vs. 54.5 %), and negative prediction (78.9% vs. 30.6 %), but similar specificity (88.2% vs. 84.6 %) and positive prediction (95.9% vs. 93.8 %) in comparison to sonography.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The echo amplitude of the FUS transducer serves as a sensitive and dependable metric for monitoring the FUAS outcomes. Its utilization may augment the procedure's safety and efficacy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324001486\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324001486","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的B型超声造影通常用于监测聚焦超声消融手术(FUAS),但在灵敏度方面存在局限性。方法 对聚焦超声(FUS)换能器进行改装,使其能够接收回波。数值模拟比较了 FUS 换能器和成像探头在不同组织深度和频率下的归一化回波振幅,病灶处有 3 毫米坏死。然后进行了一次体内实验,评估了不同设置下 FUS 传感器和超声成像探头的回声变化。结果与超声成像探头相比,随着组织穿透深度的增加,FUS 换能器产生的回声振幅下降不那么明显。在深度为 2 厘米和 4 厘米的体外牛肝实验中,FUS 传感器检测到的归一化回波振幅明显大于超声成像探头接收到的回波振幅(即 2∼3 倍)。此外,复制临床条件的多层体外组织实验显示,利用 FUS 传感器的回波振幅进行凝血预测的准确性(91.2% 对 60.3%)、灵敏度(92.1% 对 54.5%)和阴性预测(78.结论 FUS 传感器的回声振幅是监测 FUAS 结果的灵敏可靠的指标。利用它可以提高手术的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monitoring focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS) using echo amplitudes of the therapeutic focused transducer

Objective

B-mode sonography is commonly used to monitor focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS), but has limitations in sensitivity. More accurate and reliable prediction of coagulation is required.

Methods

The focused ultrasound (FUS) transducer was adapted for echo reception. Numerical simulations compared the normalized echo amplitudes from the FUS transducer and imaging probe at varying tissue depths and frequencies with a 3 mm necrosis at focus. An ex vivo experiment then evaluated echo changes from the FUS transducer and ultrasound imaging probe under different settings. Finally, coagulation prediction using FUS echo data was compared to sonography in a clinical ex vivo context.

Results

The echo amplitudes from the FUS transducer exhibit a less pronounced decline with increasing tissue penetration depth compared to the ultrasound imaging probe. In ex vivo bovine liver experiments at depths of 2 cm and 4 cm, the FUS transducer detected normalized echo amplitudes that were significantly larger (i.e., 2∼3 folds) than those received by the ultrasound imaging probe. Moreover, multi-layered ex vivo tissue experiments that replicate clinical conditions revealed that coagulation prediction utilizing the FUS transducer's echo amplitudes achieved superior accuracy (91.2% vs. 60.3 %), sensitivity (92.1% vs. 54.5 %), and negative prediction (78.9% vs. 30.6 %), but similar specificity (88.2% vs. 84.6 %) and positive prediction (95.9% vs. 93.8 %) in comparison to sonography.

Conclusion

The echo amplitude of the FUS transducer serves as a sensitive and dependable metric for monitoring the FUAS outcomes. Its utilization may augment the procedure's safety and efficacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Engineering & Physics
Medical Engineering & Physics 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS) using echo amplitudes of the therapeutic focused transducer 3D bioheat transfer mapping reveals nanomagnetic particles effectiveness in radiofrequency hyperthermia breast cancer treatment comparing to experimental study Bone ingrowth in randomly distributed porous interbody cage during lumbar spinal fusion A method of nucleus image segmentation and counting based on TC-UNet++ and distance watershed Integrated analysis of clinical indicators and mechanical properties in cancellous bone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1