Josef E Gillson, Sooin Byeon, Angela Chou, Sarah Maloney, Nick Pavlakis, Stephen J Clarke, David L Chan, Connie I Diakos, Anthony J Gill, Jaswinder S Samra, Anubhav Mittal, Sumit Sahni
{"title":"用于监测胰腺癌患者新辅助化疗疗效的生物标记物面板前景看好。","authors":"Josef E Gillson, Sooin Byeon, Angela Chou, Sarah Maloney, Nick Pavlakis, Stephen J Clarke, David L Chan, Connie I Diakos, Anthony J Gill, Jaswinder S Samra, Anubhav Mittal, Sumit Sahni","doi":"10.1111/eci.14341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can provide improved survival outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients who respond to treatment, but currently available biomarkers cannot reliably predict NAC response. This study aimed to determine the potential of a previously identified diagnostic and prognostic biomarker panel (i.e. Ca-125, S100A2, S100A4, Mesothelin and Ca19-9) for the monitoring of NAC-response in PDAC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective study, utilised serum from NAC treated PDAC patients to determine the levels of biomarkers by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The percentage of the tumour bed occupied by viable carcinoma (PVC) was used to divide patients into good (PVC < 50%) and poor (PVC ≥ 50%) NAC-responders. Statistical analysis was performed to measure the ability of individual biomarkers and a biomarker panel in NAC treatment response and patient survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum specimens from a total of 108 PDAC patients were assessed. Ca-125, Ca19-9 and S100A2 showed a significant positive correlation with PVC. Ca-125 demonstrated a superior ability to monitor NAC treatment response (Area under receiver operating curve (AUC): .6954) compared to the more widely used clinical biomarker, Ca19-9 (AUC: .6291). A panel of Ca-125 and Ca19-9 showed good ability to monitor NAC response in PDAC patients (AUC: .7349). Patients with high levels of both Ca-125 and Ca19-9 were shown to have the poorest overall survival (median overall survival: 17 vs. 30 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A serum biomarker panel of Ca-125 and Ca19-9 could be used for effective clinical management of PDAC patients undergoing NAC treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"e14341"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promising biomarker panel to monitor therapeutic efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Josef E Gillson, Sooin Byeon, Angela Chou, Sarah Maloney, Nick Pavlakis, Stephen J Clarke, David L Chan, Connie I Diakos, Anthony J Gill, Jaswinder S Samra, Anubhav Mittal, Sumit Sahni\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eci.14341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can provide improved survival outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients who respond to treatment, but currently available biomarkers cannot reliably predict NAC response. This study aimed to determine the potential of a previously identified diagnostic and prognostic biomarker panel (i.e. Ca-125, S100A2, S100A4, Mesothelin and Ca19-9) for the monitoring of NAC-response in PDAC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective study, utilised serum from NAC treated PDAC patients to determine the levels of biomarkers by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The percentage of the tumour bed occupied by viable carcinoma (PVC) was used to divide patients into good (PVC < 50%) and poor (PVC ≥ 50%) NAC-responders. Statistical analysis was performed to measure the ability of individual biomarkers and a biomarker panel in NAC treatment response and patient survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum specimens from a total of 108 PDAC patients were assessed. Ca-125, Ca19-9 and S100A2 showed a significant positive correlation with PVC. Ca-125 demonstrated a superior ability to monitor NAC treatment response (Area under receiver operating curve (AUC): .6954) compared to the more widely used clinical biomarker, Ca19-9 (AUC: .6291). A panel of Ca-125 and Ca19-9 showed good ability to monitor NAC response in PDAC patients (AUC: .7349). Patients with high levels of both Ca-125 and Ca19-9 were shown to have the poorest overall survival (median overall survival: 17 vs. 30 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A serum biomarker panel of Ca-125 and Ca19-9 could be used for effective clinical management of PDAC patients undergoing NAC treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14341\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Promising biomarker panel to monitor therapeutic efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer patients.
Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can provide improved survival outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients who respond to treatment, but currently available biomarkers cannot reliably predict NAC response. This study aimed to determine the potential of a previously identified diagnostic and prognostic biomarker panel (i.e. Ca-125, S100A2, S100A4, Mesothelin and Ca19-9) for the monitoring of NAC-response in PDAC patients.
Methods: This single-centre, retrospective study, utilised serum from NAC treated PDAC patients to determine the levels of biomarkers by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The percentage of the tumour bed occupied by viable carcinoma (PVC) was used to divide patients into good (PVC < 50%) and poor (PVC ≥ 50%) NAC-responders. Statistical analysis was performed to measure the ability of individual biomarkers and a biomarker panel in NAC treatment response and patient survival.
Results: Serum specimens from a total of 108 PDAC patients were assessed. Ca-125, Ca19-9 and S100A2 showed a significant positive correlation with PVC. Ca-125 demonstrated a superior ability to monitor NAC treatment response (Area under receiver operating curve (AUC): .6954) compared to the more widely used clinical biomarker, Ca19-9 (AUC: .6291). A panel of Ca-125 and Ca19-9 showed good ability to monitor NAC response in PDAC patients (AUC: .7349). Patients with high levels of both Ca-125 and Ca19-9 were shown to have the poorest overall survival (median overall survival: 17 vs. 30 months).
Conclusion: A serum biomarker panel of Ca-125 and Ca19-9 could be used for effective clinical management of PDAC patients undergoing NAC treatment.
期刊介绍:
EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.