使用低功率钬源进行钬激光治疗的最小化方法:回顾性研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.22037/uj.v21i.8071
Ramazan Inan, Ibrahim Buldu
{"title":"使用低功率钬源进行钬激光治疗的最小化方法:回顾性研究。","authors":"Ramazan Inan, Ibrahim Buldu","doi":"10.22037/uj.v21i.8071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of very low-power Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) on a 30-W holmium laser source.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>  With the approval of the local ethics committee, we retrospectively analysed 60 patients treated with HoLEP. There were 30 patients in the low-power (LP) group and 30 patients in the very low-power (VLP) group. For the LP group, we used a 60-W holmium laser machine. Throughout the en bloc process, we used laser settings of 2 J and 20 Hz. We used a 30-W low-power holmium source in the VLP group. We used laser settings of 2 J and 10 Hz. All patients were operated on by an experienced surgeon. We evaluated the surgical parameters and practicality of the low-power laser vs. the very low-power laser.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients underwent successful HoLEP in the very low-power group; it was not necessary to increase the output of the laser in any case. Mean preoperatively estimated prostate volume was 88.1 mL (range, 30-300 mL). Mean enucleation time and enucleation efficiency were 67.9 min (range, 25-150 min) and 0.99 gm/min (range, 0.8-1.8 gm/min), respectively. No patient required blood transfusion postoperatively. No stress urinary incontinence (SUI) was observed in the 3rd month postoperative follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a low-power laser source is encouraging for the learning curve of new surgeons who will begin HoLEP surgery; it can facilitate the adoption of HoLEP in developing countries, where the initial capital investment may be a major obstacle.</p>","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimalist Approach for HoLEP with A Low-Power Holmium Source: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ramazan Inan, Ibrahim Buldu\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/uj.v21i.8071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of very low-power Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) on a 30-W holmium laser source.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>  With the approval of the local ethics committee, we retrospectively analysed 60 patients treated with HoLEP. There were 30 patients in the low-power (LP) group and 30 patients in the very low-power (VLP) group. For the LP group, we used a 60-W holmium laser machine. Throughout the en bloc process, we used laser settings of 2 J and 20 Hz. We used a 30-W low-power holmium source in the VLP group. We used laser settings of 2 J and 10 Hz. All patients were operated on by an experienced surgeon. We evaluated the surgical parameters and practicality of the low-power laser vs. the very low-power laser.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients underwent successful HoLEP in the very low-power group; it was not necessary to increase the output of the laser in any case. Mean preoperatively estimated prostate volume was 88.1 mL (range, 30-300 mL). Mean enucleation time and enucleation efficiency were 67.9 min (range, 25-150 min) and 0.99 gm/min (range, 0.8-1.8 gm/min), respectively. No patient required blood transfusion postoperatively. No stress urinary incontinence (SUI) was observed in the 3rd month postoperative follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a low-power laser source is encouraging for the learning curve of new surgeons who will begin HoLEP surgery; it can facilitate the adoption of HoLEP in developing countries, where the initial capital investment may be a major obstacle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v21i.8071\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v21i.8071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估使用30瓦钬激光光源的超低功率钬激光前列腺去核术(HoLEP)的有效性和安全性: 经当地伦理委员会批准,我们对60名接受HoLEP治疗的患者进行了回顾性分析。低功率(LP)组和超低功率(VLP)组各有 30 名患者。在低功率组,我们使用了一台 60 瓦的钬激光机。在整个全切过程中,我们使用的激光设置为 2 J 和 20 Hz。在 VLP 组中,我们使用了 30 瓦的低功率钬激光源。我们使用的激光设置为 2 J 和 10 Hz。所有患者均由经验丰富的外科医生进行手术。我们评估了低功率激光与超低功率激光的手术参数和实用性:结果:在超低功率组中,所有患者都成功接受了前列腺电切术(HoLEP);在任何情况下都无需增加激光的输出功率。术前估计的前列腺平均体积为 88.1 mL(范围为 30-300 mL)。平均去核时间和去核效率分别为 67.9 分钟(范围为 25-150 分钟)和 0.99 克/分钟(范围为 0.8-1.8 克/分钟)。术后没有患者需要输血。术后三个月随访未发现压力性尿失禁(SUI):结论:使用低功率激光源对于即将开始 HoLEP 手术的新外科医生的学习曲线是令人鼓舞的;它可以促进 HoLEP 在发展中国家的应用,因为在这些国家,初始资本投资可能是一个主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minimalist Approach for HoLEP with A Low-Power Holmium Source: A Retrospective Study.

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of very low-power Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) on a 30-W holmium laser source.

Materials and methods:   With the approval of the local ethics committee, we retrospectively analysed 60 patients treated with HoLEP. There were 30 patients in the low-power (LP) group and 30 patients in the very low-power (VLP) group. For the LP group, we used a 60-W holmium laser machine. Throughout the en bloc process, we used laser settings of 2 J and 20 Hz. We used a 30-W low-power holmium source in the VLP group. We used laser settings of 2 J and 10 Hz. All patients were operated on by an experienced surgeon. We evaluated the surgical parameters and practicality of the low-power laser vs. the very low-power laser.

Results: All patients underwent successful HoLEP in the very low-power group; it was not necessary to increase the output of the laser in any case. Mean preoperatively estimated prostate volume was 88.1 mL (range, 30-300 mL). Mean enucleation time and enucleation efficiency were 67.9 min (range, 25-150 min) and 0.99 gm/min (range, 0.8-1.8 gm/min), respectively. No patient required blood transfusion postoperatively. No stress urinary incontinence (SUI) was observed in the 3rd month postoperative follow-up.

Conclusion: The use of a low-power laser source is encouraging for the learning curve of new surgeons who will begin HoLEP surgery; it can facilitate the adoption of HoLEP in developing countries, where the initial capital investment may be a major obstacle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Journal
Urology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist. Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Knowledge of ChatGPT in Answering Questions Regarding Female Urology. The Comparative Study on the Application Value of Transperineal Prostate Combined Biopsy and Transrectal Prostate Systematic Biopsy in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer in Patients with Different PSA Zones. Sexual Functions in Men with Congenital Bilateral Absence of the Vas Deferens: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study with Fertile Men. Prognostic Significance of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer after Radical Cystectomy. Minimalist Approach for HoLEP with A Low-Power Holmium Source: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1